Skip to main content

An ROI Visual-Analytical Approach for Exploring Uncertainty in Reservoir Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP 2018)

Abstract

Uncertainty in reservoir geological properties has a major impact on reservoir modeling and operations decision-making, and it leads to the generation of a large set of stochastic models, called geological realizations. Flow simulations are then used to quantify the uncertainty in predicting the hydrocarbon production. However, reservoir flow simulation is a computationally intensive task. In a recent paper, we proposed a visual based analytical framework to select a few models from a large ensemble of geological realizations. In this paper, we extend our prior framework by introducing the region of interest concept, that helps to perform the entire analysis only based on a specific portion of the reservoir. The effectiveness of region of interest selection techniques is shown on two case studies. We also performed a complete user study with the engineers. User feedback suggests that usefulness, usability and visual interactivity are the key strengths of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://vimeo.com/251921649.

References

  1. Caers, J.: Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biol. Fertil. Soils 27(4), 315–334 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Idrobo, E.A., Choudhary, M.K., Datta-Gupta, A.: Swept volume calculations and ranking of geostatistical reservoir models using streamline simulation. In: SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers, January 2000

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ballin, P.R., Journel, A.G., Aziz, K.: Prediction of uncertainty in reservoir performance forecast. J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 31(04), 52–62 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheidt, C., Caers, J.: Bootstrap confidence intervals for reservoir model selection techniques. Comput. Geosci. 14(2), 369–382 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sahaf, Z., Hamdi, H., Cabral Ramos Mota, R., Costa Sousa, M., Maurer, F.: A visual analytics framework for exploring uncertainties in reservoir models. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 3: IVAPP, pp. 74–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5220/0006608500740084, ISBN 978-989-758-289-9

  7. Yazdi, M.M., Jensen, J.L.: Fast screening of geostatistical realizations for SAGD reservoir simulation. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 124, 264–274 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rahim, S., Li, Z.: Reservoir geological uncertainty reduction: an optimization-based method using multiple static measures. Math. Geosci. 47(4), 373–396 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, A.T., Potter, K.C.: Toward visual analysis of ensemble data sets. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Ultrascale Visualization, pp. 48–53. ACM, November 2009

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kehrer, J., Hauser, H.: Visualization and visual analysis of multifaceted scientific data: a survey. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 19(3), 495–513 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Love, A.L., Pang, A., Kao, D.L.: Visualizing spatial multivalue data. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 25(3), 69–79 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kao, D., Luo, A., Dungan, J.L., Pang, A.: Visualizing spatially varying distribution data. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation, pp. 219–225. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Demir, I., Dick, C., Westermann, R.: Multi-charts for comparative 3D ensemble visualization. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 20(12), 2694–2703 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kehrer, J., Muigg, P., Doleisch, H., Hauser, H.: Interactive visual analysis of heterogeneous scientific data across an interface. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 17(7), 934–946 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nocke, T., Flechsig, M., Böhm, U.: Visual exploration and evaluation of climate-related simulation data. In: Proceedings of the 39th Conference on Winter Simulation: 40 years! The Best is Yet to Come, pp. 703–711. IEEE Press, December 2007

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kehrer, J., Filzmoser, P., Hauser, H.: Brushing moments in interactive visual analysis. Comput. Graph. Forum 29(3), 813–822 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fofonov, A., Molchanov, V., Linsen, L.: Visual analysis of multi-run spatio-temporal simulations using isocontour similarity for projected views. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 22(8), 2037–2050 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Correa, C.D., Chan, Y.H., Ma, K.L.: A framework for uncertainty-aware visual analytics. In: IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, VAST 2009, pp. 51–58. IEEE, October 2009

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bordoloi, U.D., Kao, D.L., Shen, H.W.: Visualization techniques for spatial probability density function data. Data Sci. J. 3, 153–162 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bruckner, S., Moller, T.: Result-driven exploration of simulation parameter spaces for visual effects design. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 16(6), 1468–1476 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fenwick, D.H., Batycky, R.P.: Using metric space methods to analyse reservoir uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Gussow Conference, Banff, Alberta, Canada (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sahaf, Z., Hamdi, H., Maurer, F., Nghiem, L., Sousa, M.C.: Clustering of geological models for reservoir simulation studies in a visual analytics framework. In: 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016, May 2016

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sahaf, Z., Hamdi, H., Maurer, F., Nghiem, L., Chen, Z., Sousa, M.C.: Filtering geological realizations for SAGD. In: 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017, June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  24. Honarkhah, M., Caers, J.: Stochastic simulation of patterns using distance-based pattern modeling. Math. Geosci. 42(5), 487–517 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mela, K., Louie, J.N.: Correlation length and fractal dimension interpretation from seismic data using variograms and power spectra. Geophysics 66(5), 1372–1378 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. MacKay, D.J., Mac Kay, D.J.: Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shawe-Taylor, J., Cristianini, N.: Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., Müller, K.R.: Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Comput. 10(5), 1299–1319 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A.J.: Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Williams, C.K.: On a connection between kernel PCA and metric multidimensional scaling. Mach. Learn. 46(1–3), 11–19 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dhillon, I.S., Guan, Y., Kulis, B.: Kernel k-means: spectral clustering and normalized cuts. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 551–556. ACM, August 2004

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cosentino, L.: Integrated reservoir studies. Editions Technip (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Goshtasby, A.A.: Image Registration: Principles, Tools and Methods. Springer Science & Business Media (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: ICML, vol. 98, pp. 296–304. Citeseer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.: Imex, black oil reservoir simulator (1980). cmgl.ca/imex

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Sahaf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sahaf, Z., Mota, R.C., Hamdi, H., Sousa, M.C., Maurer, F. (2019). An ROI Visual-Analytical Approach for Exploring Uncertainty in Reservoir Models. In: Bechmann, D., et al. Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications. VISIGRAPP 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 997. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26756-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26756-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26755-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26756-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics