Skip to main content

Fake News Detection in Microblogging Through Quantifier-Guided Aggregation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence (MDAI 2019)

Abstract

Nowadays, big volumes of User-Generated Content (UGC) spread across various kinds of social media. In microblogging, UCG can be generated in the form of ‘newsworthy’ posts, i.e., related to information that has a public utility for the people. In this context, being the UGC diffused without almost any traditional form of trusted external control, the possibility of incurring in possible fake news is far from remote. For this reason, several approaches for fake news detection in microblogging have been proposed up to now, mostly based on machine learning techniques. In this paper, an ongoing work based on the use of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) paradigm to detect fake news is proposed. The aim is to reduce data dependency in building the model, and to have flexible control over the choices behind the fake news detection process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://twitter.com.

  2. 2.

    https://weibo.com.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/compsocial/CREDBANK-data.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/cbuntain/CREDBANK-data.

  5. 5.

    Empirically, for all the features, higher values can be interpreted as ‘more credible’. Some theoretical justifications about the type of features and the values associated with them in the assessment of the credibility of information are provided in [18, 23].

  6. 6.

    https://pandas.pydata.org, http://www.numpy.org.

  7. 7.

    http://scikit-learn.org/stable/index.html.

  8. 8.

    https://github.com/cbuntain/CREDBANK-data/tree/master/src/main/python/Labeling.

References

  1. Ben-Arieh, D.: Sensitivity of multi-criteria decision making to linguistic quantifiers and aggregation means. Comput. Ind. Eng. 48(2), 289–309 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buntain, C., Golbeck, J.: Automatically identifying fake news in popular Twitter threads. In: IEEE Smart Cloud (SmartCloud 2017), pp. 208–215. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carminati, B., Ferrari, E., Viviani, M.: A multi-dimensional and event-based model for trust computation in the social web. In: Aberer, K., Flache, A., Jager, W., Liu, L., Tang, J., Guéret, C. (eds.) SocInfo 2012. LNCS, vol. 7710, pp. 323–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35386-4_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 675–684. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Predicting information credibility in time-sensitive social media. Internet Res. 23(5), 560–588 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., Viviani, M.: Adding a peer-to-peer trust layer to metadata generators. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 809–815. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11575863_102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Conroy, N.J., Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y.: Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news. Proc. AIST 52(1), 1–4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Damiani, E., Viviani, M.: Trading anonymity for influence in open communities voting schemata. In: SocInfo 2009, pp. 63–67. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Galán-García, P., et al.: Supervised machine learning for the detection of troll profiles in Twitter social network. Logic J. IGPL 24(1), 42–53 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Rui Figueira, J. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta, A., Kaushal, R.: Improving spam detection in online social networks. In: Cognitive Computing and Information Processing (CCIP), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P.: Credibility ranking of tweets during high impact events. In: Workshop on Privacy and Security in Online Social Media, p. 2. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta, M., Zhao, P., Han, J.: Evaluating event credibility on Twitter. In: SDM, pp. 153–164. SIAM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heydari, A., Ali Tavakoli, M., Salim, N., Heydari, Z.: Detection of review spam: a survey. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(7), 3634–3642 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jin, Z., Cao, J., Jiang, Y.-G., Zhang, Y.: News credibility evaluation on Microblog with a hierarchical propagation model. In: ICDM 2014, pp. 230–239. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kang, B., O’Donovan, J., Höllerer, T.: Modeling topic specific credibility on Twitter. In: Proceedings of IUI 2012, pp. 179–188. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kubat, M.: An Introduction to Machine Learning. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20010-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Luca, M., Zervas, G.: Fake it till you make it: reputation, competition, and yelp review fraud. Manag. Sci. 62(12), 3412–3427 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marrara, S., Pasi, G., Viviani, M.: Aggregation operators in information retrieval. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 324, 3–19 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitra, T., Gilbert, E.: CREDBANK: a large-scale social media corpus with associated credibility annotations. In: ICWSM, pp. 258–267 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V., Liu, B., Glance, N.: Fake review detection: classification and analysis of real and pseudo reviews, T.R. UIC-CS-03-2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 34(1), 1–47 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Viviani, M., Pasi, G.: Quantifier guided aggregation for the veracity assessment of online reviews. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 32(5), 481–501 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Viviani, M., Pasi, G.: Credibility in social media: opinions, news, and health information—a survey. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 7(5), e1209 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yager, R.R.: Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 11(1), 49–73 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J.: The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6123-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, L., Hua, T., Lu, C.-T., Chen, I.-R.: A topic-focused trust model for Twitter. Comput. Commun. 76, 1–11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Viviani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

De Grandis, M., Pasi, G., Viviani, M. (2019). Fake News Detection in Microblogging Through Quantifier-Guided Aggregation. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Pasi, G., Viviani, M. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26773-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26773-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26772-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26773-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics