Abstract
Nowadays, big volumes of User-Generated Content (UGC) spread across various kinds of social media. In microblogging, UCG can be generated in the form of ‘newsworthy’ posts, i.e., related to information that has a public utility for the people. In this context, being the UGC diffused without almost any traditional form of trusted external control, the possibility of incurring in possible fake news is far from remote. For this reason, several approaches for fake news detection in microblogging have been proposed up to now, mostly based on machine learning techniques. In this paper, an ongoing work based on the use of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) paradigm to detect fake news is proposed. The aim is to reduce data dependency in building the model, and to have flexible control over the choices behind the fake news detection process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
References
Ben-Arieh, D.: Sensitivity of multi-criteria decision making to linguistic quantifiers and aggregation means. Comput. Ind. Eng. 48(2), 289–309 (2005)
Buntain, C., Golbeck, J.: Automatically identifying fake news in popular Twitter threads. In: IEEE Smart Cloud (SmartCloud 2017), pp. 208–215. IEEE (2017)
Carminati, B., Ferrari, E., Viviani, M.: A multi-dimensional and event-based model for trust computation in the social web. In: Aberer, K., Flache, A., Jager, W., Liu, L., Tang, J., Guéret, C. (eds.) SocInfo 2012. LNCS, vol. 7710, pp. 323–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35386-4_24
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 675–684. ACM (2011)
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Predicting information credibility in time-sensitive social media. Internet Res. 23(5), 560–588 (2012)
Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., Viviani, M.: Adding a peer-to-peer trust layer to metadata generators. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 809–815. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11575863_102
Conroy, N.J., Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y.: Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news. Proc. AIST 52(1), 1–4 (2015)
Damiani, E., Viviani, M.: Trading anonymity for influence in open communities voting schemata. In: SocInfo 2009, pp. 63–67. IEEE (2009)
Galán-García, P., et al.: Supervised machine learning for the detection of troll profiles in Twitter social network. Logic J. IGPL 24(1), 42–53 (2016)
Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Rui Figueira, J. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4
Gupta, A., Kaushal, R.: Improving spam detection in online social networks. In: Cognitive Computing and Information Processing (CCIP), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)
Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P.: Credibility ranking of tweets during high impact events. In: Workshop on Privacy and Security in Online Social Media, p. 2. ACM (2012)
Gupta, M., Zhao, P., Han, J.: Evaluating event credibility on Twitter. In: SDM, pp. 153–164. SIAM (2012)
Heydari, A., Ali Tavakoli, M., Salim, N., Heydari, Z.: Detection of review spam: a survey. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(7), 3634–3642 (2015)
Jin, Z., Cao, J., Jiang, Y.-G., Zhang, Y.: News credibility evaluation on Microblog with a hierarchical propagation model. In: ICDM 2014, pp. 230–239. IEEE (2014)
Kang, B., O’Donovan, J., Höllerer, T.: Modeling topic specific credibility on Twitter. In: Proceedings of IUI 2012, pp. 179–188. ACM (2012)
Kubat, M.: An Introduction to Machine Learning. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20010-1
Luca, M., Zervas, G.: Fake it till you make it: reputation, competition, and yelp review fraud. Manag. Sci. 62(12), 3412–3427 (2016)
Marrara, S., Pasi, G., Viviani, M.: Aggregation operators in information retrieval. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 324, 3–19 (2016)
Mitra, T., Gilbert, E.: CREDBANK: a large-scale social media corpus with associated credibility annotations. In: ICWSM, pp. 258–267 (2015)
Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V., Liu, B., Glance, N.: Fake review detection: classification and analysis of real and pseudo reviews, T.R. UIC-CS-03-2013 (2013)
Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 34(1), 1–47 (2002)
Viviani, M., Pasi, G.: Quantifier guided aggregation for the veracity assessment of online reviews. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 32(5), 481–501 (2016)
Viviani, M., Pasi, G.: Credibility in social media: opinions, news, and health information—a survey. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 7(5), e1209 (2017)
Yager, R.R.: Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 11(1), 49–73 (1996)
Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J.: The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6123-1
Zhao, L., Hua, T., Lu, C.-T., Chen, I.-R.: A topic-focused trust model for Twitter. Comput. Commun. 76, 1–11 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
De Grandis, M., Pasi, G., Viviani, M. (2019). Fake News Detection in Microblogging Through Quantifier-Guided Aggregation. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Pasi, G., Viviani, M. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26773-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26773-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26772-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26773-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)