Skip to main content

Prioritizing Use Cases for Development of Mobile Apps Using AHP: A Case Study in To-Do List Apps

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems (MobiWIS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11673))

Abstract

With the rapid development of communication technologies, the uses of mobile apps have increased in a significant manner over the past few years. Every day many different types of mobile apps are uploaded to mobile application markets. However, it is very difficult for the apps to stay competitive and survive in these marketplaces. Covering the requirements fitting the needs of users is one of significant factors in mobile apps’ success in the market. In this regard, this study aims to use Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the use cases for the development of mobile apps. The results show that AHP provides an efficient tool which can be used to determine importance of the requirements in mobile apps considering users’ preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statista: Number of apps available in leading app stores as of 1st quarter 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Statista: Worldwide mobile app revenues in 2015, 2016 and 2020 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aurum, A., Wohlin, C.: Engineering and Managing Software Requirements. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28244-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Karlsson, J., Ryan, K.: A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements. IEEE Softw. 14, 67–74 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehtola, L., Kauppinen, M., Kujala, S.: Requirements prioritization challenges in practice (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pohl, K.: Requirements Engineering: Fundamentals, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Barney, S., Aurum, A., Wohlin, C.: A product management challenge: creating software product value through requirements selection. J. Syst. Arch. 54, 576–593 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aurum, A., Wohlin, C.: A value-based approach in requirements engineering: explaining some of the fundamental concepts. In: Sawyer, P., Paech, B., Heymans, P. (eds.) REFSQ 2007. LNCS, vol. 4542, pp. 109–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73031-6_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Faulk, S.R., Harmon, R.R., Raffo, D.M.: Value-based software engineering (VBSE): a value-driven approach to product-line engineering. In: First International Conference on Software Product-Line Engineering, pp. 1–13 (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Boehm, B.: Value-based software engineering: reinventing. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 28, 3 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Favaro, J.: Managing requirements for business value. IEEE Softw. 19, 15–17 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wohlin, C., Aurum, A.: Criteria for selecting software requirements to create product value: an industrial empirical study. In: Biffl, S., Aurum, A., Boehm, B., Erdogmus, H., Grünbacher, P. (eds.) Value-Based Software Engineering, pp. 179–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29263-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramzan, M., Jaffar, M.A., Shahid, A.A.: Value based intelligent requirement prioritization (VIRP): expert driven fuzzy logic based prioritization technique. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control. 7, 1017–1038 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Achimugu, P., Selamat, A., Ibrahim, R., Mahrin, M.N.R.: A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56, 568–585 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Azar, J., Smith, R.K., Cordes, D.: Value-oriented requirements prioritization in a small development organization. IEEE Softw. 24, 32–37 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Iqbal, M.A., Zaidi, A.M., Murtaza, S.: A new requirement prioritization model for market driven products using analytical hierarchical process. In: DSDE 2010 - International Conference on Data Storage and Data Engineering, pp. 142–149 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Babar, M.I., Ghazali, M., Jawawi, D.N.A., Shamsuddin, S.M., Ibrahim, N.: PHandler: an expert system for a scalable software requirements prioritization process. Knowl.-Based Syst. 84, 179–202 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shao, F., Peng, R., Lai, H., Wang, B.: DRank: a semi-automated requirements prioritization method based on preferences and dependencies. J. Syst. Softw. 126, 141–156 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1, 83 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karlsson, J., Wohlin, C., Regnell, B.: An evaluation of methods for prioritizing software requirements. Inf. Softw. Technol. 39, 939–947 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Büyüközkan, G.: Determining the mobile commerce user requirements using an analytic approach. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 31, 144–152 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nikou, S., Mezei, J., Bouwman, H.: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach for selecting mobile service category: (consumers’ preferences). In: Proceedings - 2011 10th International Conference on Mobile Business, ICMB 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nikou, S., Mezei, J.: Evaluation of mobile services and substantial adoption factors with analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Telecomm. Policy 37, 915–929 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48, 9–26 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Franek, J., Kresta, A.: Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP. Procedia Econ. Financ. 12, 164–173 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saaty, T., Vergas, L.G.: Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2nd edn (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shrestha, R.K., Alavalapati, J.R.R., Kalmbacher, R.S.: Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agric. Syst. 81, 185–199 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onur Yildirim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yildirim, O., Peker, S. (2019). Prioritizing Use Cases for Development of Mobile Apps Using AHP: A Case Study in To-Do List Apps. In: Awan, I., Younas, M., Ünal, P., Aleksy, M. (eds) Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems. MobiWIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11673. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27192-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27192-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27191-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27192-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics