Skip to main content

Factors Affecting e-ID Public Acceptance: A Literature Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (EGOVIS 2019)

Abstract

This paper presents a literature review that has the main goal to examine what are the factors that are affecting eID public acceptance. We are specifically interested in the perspectives of end-users and the matter of their attitudes towards eID. Our search yielded a rather narrow but concrete range of sources. Among the main themes of interest presented in the literature, we identify factors that are further synthesized in twelve categories. Moreover, we interpret the factors in their original context which allows for understanding which of the factors are mentioned as either drivers, barriers, or both. Based on the analysis of scientific narratives, we point to disparities detected in the existing knowledge of influential factors of eID public acceptance and outline areas that require further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahrenstedt, S., Huang, J., Wollny, L.: A study on factors influencing the acceptance of mobile payment applications in Sweden. Dissertation (2015). http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-26738

  2. Al-Hujran, O., Al-dalahmeh, M., Aloudat, A.: The role of national culture on citizen adoption of eGovernment services: an empirical study. Electron. J. E-Government 9(2), 93–106 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alkhalifah, A., Al Amro, S.: Understanding the effect of privacy concerns on user adoption of identity management systems. J. Comput. 12(2), 174–182 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17706/jcp.12.2.174-182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alkhalifah, A., D’Ambra, J.: The role of trust in the initial adoption of identity management systems. In: Linger, H., Fisher, J., Barnden, A., Barry, C., Lang, M., Schneider, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Systems Development, pp. 25–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7540-8_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Alkhalifah, A.: Factors effecting user adoption of identity management systems: an empirical study (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andermatt, K.C., Göldi, R.A.: Introducing an electronic identity: the co-design approach in the canton of schaffhausen. Schaffhausen Swiss Yearb. Adm. Sci. 9, 41–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5334/ssas.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Backhouse, J., Halperin, R.: A survey on EU citizens trust in ID systems and authorities (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Backhouse, J., Halperin, R.: Approaching interoperability for identity management systems. In: Rannenberg, K., Royer, D., Deuker, A. (eds.) The Future of Identity in the Information Society, pp. 245–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01820-6_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Backhouse, J., Halperin, R.: Security and privacy perceptions of e- ID: a grounded research. In: Proceeding of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2008, Galway, Ireland (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: On being “systematic” in literature reviews in IS. J. Inf. Technol. 30(2), 161–173 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Standing on the shoulders of giants: challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37(1), 205–224 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brugger, J., Fraefel, M., Riedl, R.: Raising acceptance of cross-border eID federation by value alignment. Electron. J. e-Government 12(2), 178–188 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Budgen, D., Brereton, P.: Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 1051–1052. ACM, May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cap, C.H., Maibaum, N.: Digital identity and its implications for electronic government. In: Schmid, B., Stanoevska-Slabeva, K., Tschammer, V. (eds.) Towards the E-Society - E-Commerce, E-Business, and E-Government; (I3E’01), Zürich, pp. 803–816 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chauhan, S., Kaushik, A.: Evaluating citizen acceptance of unique identification number in India: an empirical study. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 12(3) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2016.078416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuijpers, C., Schroers, J.: eIDAS as Guideline for the Development of a Pan-European eID Framework in FutureID. GI-Edition Lect Notes Informatics (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 359. Attitudes on Data Protection and Electronic Identity in the European Union (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. European Commission. Electronic Identities - A brief introduction 6 (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/ict_psp/documents/eid_introduction.pdf

  20. Goodstadt, L.F., Connolly, R., Bannister, F.: The Hong Kong e-Identity card: examining the reasons for its success when other cards continue to struggle. Inf. Syst. Manag. 32(1), 72–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2015.983025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Halperin, R., Backhouse, J.: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Citizens’ Perception of EIDs and Interoperability (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harbach, M., Fahl, S., Rieger, M., Smith, M.: On the acceptance of privacy-preserving authentication technology: the curious case of national identity cards. In: De Cristofaro, E., Wright, M. (eds.) PETS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7981. Springer, Berlin (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39077-7_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones, L.A., Antón, A.I., Earp, J.B.: Towards understanding user perceptions of authentication technologies. In: Proceedings of 2007 ACM Workshop on Privacy in Electronic Society (WPES 2007), pp. 91–98 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1314333.1314352

  24. Kalvet, T., Tiits, M., Laas-Mikko, K.: Public acceptance of advanced identity documents. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance – ICEGOV 2018, pp. 429–432. ACM Press, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khan, H., Hutchison, A.: Data privacy implications for security information and event management systems and other meta-systems. In: Felici, M. (ed.) CSP 2013. CCIS, vol. 182 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41205-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Adjei, J.K.: A Case for Implementation of Citizen Centric National Identity Management Systems: Crafting a Trusted National Identity Management Policy, 1 edn. Institut for Elektroniske Systemer, Aalborg Universitet (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lips, M.: Rethinking citizen-government relationships in the age of digital identity: insights from research. Inf. Polity 15(4), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-2010-0216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lips, S., Pappel, I., Tsap, V., Draheim, D.: Key factors in coping with large-scale security vulnerabilities in the EID field. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds.) EGOVIS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11032, pp. 60–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Lockton, V.M.: e-Government and Identity Management in British Columbia: Implementation of the BCeID (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mariën, I., Van Audenhove, L.: The Belgian e-ID and its complex path to implementation and innovational change. Identity Inf. Soc. 3(1), 27–41 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-010-0042-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Marzooqi, S.A., Nuaimi, E.A., Qirim, N.A.: E-governance (G2C) in the public sector: citizens acceptance to E-government systems - Dubai’s case. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of Things, Data and Cloud, ICC 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3018896.3025160

  32. McGrath, K.: Identity verification and societal challenges: explaining the gap between service provision and development outcomes. MIS Q. 40, 485–500 (2016). https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2016/40.2.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Melin, U., Axelsson, K.: Managing the development of e-ID in a public e-service context: challenges and path dependencies from a life-cycle perspective. Transf. Gov.: People Process Policy 7(2), 240–255 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2013-0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ng-kruelle, G., Swatman, P.A., Hampe, J.F., Rebne, D.S.: Biometrics and e-Identity (e-Passport) in the European union : end-user perspectives on the adoption of a controversial innovation. J. Theoret. Appl. Electron. Commerce Res. 1(2), 12–35

    Google Scholar 

  35. Palgin, M.-L.: Diffusion of the estonian ID-card and its electronic usage: explaining the success. Master’s thesis, Tallinn University of Technology (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Perakslis, C., Wolk, R.: Social acceptance of RFID as a biometric security method. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 25, 34–42 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Petticrew, M., Roberts, H.: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. Blackwell Publ, Malden (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rossnagel, H., Camenisch, J., Fritsch, L., et al.: FutureID - shaping the future of electronic identity. Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 36, 189–194 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Seltsikas, P., O’Keefe, R.M.: Expectations and outcomes in electronic identity management: the role of trust and public value. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19(1), 93–103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Seven, A.: Building sustainability and trust in the usage of electronic identification using technology acceptance model. Doctoral Dissertation, Juame I University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Snijder, M.: Security & Privacy in Large Scale Biometric Systems. Special Eurobarometer, p. 359 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Strauß, S., Aichholzer, G.: National electronic identity management: the challenge of a citizen-centric approach beyond technical design. Int. J. Adv. Intell. Syst. 3(1), 12–23 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tiits, M., Kalvet, T., Laas-Mikko, K.: Social acceptance of ePassports. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group, 10–12 September 2014, Darmstadt, Germany. LNI, pp. 15–26 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tsap, V., Pappel, I., Draheim, D.: Key success factors in introducing national e-Identification systems. In: Dang, T., Wagner, R., Küng, J., Thoai, N., Takizawa, M., Neuhold, E. (eds.) FDSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10646, pp. 455–471. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70004-5_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. van Rooy, D., Bus, J.: Trust and privacy in the future internet – a research perspective. Identity Inf. Soc. 3(2), 397–404 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-010-0058-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P.A., Rose, G.M.: Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electron. Markets 12(3), 157–162 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245929

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentyna Tsap .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tsap, V., Pappel, I., Draheim, D. (2019). Factors Affecting e-ID Public Acceptance: A Literature Review. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E., Anderst-Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A., Khalil, I. (eds) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11709. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27522-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27523-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics