Skip to main content

A Gesture-Based Interface for Remote Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Connected Health in Smart Cities

Abstract

There has been a great deal of research activity in computer- and robot-assisted surgeries in recent years. Some of the advances have included robotic hip surgery, image-guided endoscopic surgery, and the use of intra-operative MRI to assist in neurosurgery. However, most of the work in the literature assumes that all of the expert surgeons are physically present close to the location of a surgery. A new direction that is now worth investigating is assisting in performing surgeries remotely. As a first step in this direction, this chapter presents a system that can detect movement of hands and fingers, and thereby detect gestures, which can be used to control a catheter remotely. Our development is aimed at performing remote endovascular surgery by controlling the movement of a catheter through blood vessels. Our hand movement detection is facilitated by sensors, like LEAP, which can track the position of fingertips and the palm. In order to make the system robust to occlusions, we have improved the implementation by optimally integrating the input from two different sensors. Following this step, we identify high-level gestures, like push and turn, to enable remote catheter movements. To simulate a realistic environment we have fabricated a flexible endovascular mold, and also a phantom of the abdominal region with the endovascular mold integrated inside. A mechanical device that can remotely control a catheter based on movement primitives extracted from gestures has been built. Experimental results are shown demonstrating the accuracy of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Guo, H. Kondo, J. Wang, J. Guo, T. Tamiya, A new catheter operating system for medical applications. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering, Beijing, China, 2007, pp. 82–86

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.W. Klein et al., The catheterization laboratory and interventional vascular suite of the future: Anticipating innovations in design and function. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 77, 447–455 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. De Sars et al., A practical approach to the design and control of active endoscopes. Mechatronics 20(2), 251–264 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Simi, G. Sardi, P. Valdastri, A. Menciassi, P. Dario, Magnetic levitation camera robot for endoscopic surgery. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, 2011, pp. 5279–5284

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Hao, J. Zhao, M. Li, Spatial continuity incorporated multi-attribute fuzzy clustering algorithm for blood vessels segmentation. Science China Inf. Sci. 53, 752–759 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Mahvash, P. Dupont, Stiffness control of surgical manipulators. IEEE Trans. Robotics 27(2), 334–345 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Lindbald, Commentary on ‘impact of shaggy aorta in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm following open or endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 52(5), 620 (Nov. 2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Monastiriotis, M. Comito, N. Labropoulos, Radiation exposure in endovascular repair of abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 62(3), 753–761 (Sep 2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Yoshinaga, K. Mabuchi, A.J. Sigurdson, M.M. Doody, E. Ron, Cancer risks among radiologists and radiologic technologists: Review of epidemiologic studies. Radiology 233, 313–321 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T.R. Koenig, D. Wolff, F.A. Mettler, L.K. Wagner, Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures. Am. J. Roentgenol. 177, 3–20 (July 2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W.K. Wong et al., Endovascular stent graft repair is an effective and safe alternative therapy for arteriovenous graft Pseudoaneurysms. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 52(5), 682–688 (November 2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.R. Smeds, A.A. Duncan, M.P. Harlander-Locke, P.F. Lawrence, S. Lyden, J. Fatima, M.K. Eskandari, Treatment and outcomes of aortic Endograft infection. J. Vasc. Surg. 63(2), 332–340 (February 2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. X. Chaufour, J. Gaudric, Y. Goueffic, R.H. Khodja, P. Feugier, S. Malikov, G. Beraud, J.-B. Ricco, A multicenter experience with infected abdominal aortic Endograft explantation. J. Vasc. Surg. 65(2), 372–380 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Aggarwal et al., Virtual reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeons’ endovascular skills. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 31(6), 588–593 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Saratzis, T. Calderbank, D. Sidloff, M.J. Bown, R.S. Davies, Role of simulation in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) training: A preliminary study. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 53(2), 193–198 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Sinceri, M. Carbone, M. Marconi, A. Moglia, M. Ferrari, V. Ferrari, Basic endovascular skills trainer: A surgical simulator for the training of novice practitioners of endovascular procedures. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2015, 5102–5105 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Shi, I. Cheng, A. Basu, Anatomy preserving 3D model decomposition based on robust skeleton-surface node correspondence. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 6 p 2011

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. Cheng, A. Firouzmanesh, A. Leleve, R. Shen, R. Moreau, V. Brizzi, M.-T. Pham, P. Lermusiaux, T. Redarce, A. Basu, Enhanced Segmentation and Skeletonization for Endovascular Surgical Planning (SPIE Medical Imaging, San Diego, February 2012), p. 7

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Rossol, I. Cheng, A. Basu, A multisensor technique for gesture recognition through intelligent skeletal pose analysis. IEEE Trans. Human Mach. Syst. 46(3), 350–359 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. D. Hoelscher, MS Thesis, Development of a Robust, Accurate Ultrasonic Tracking System for Image Guided Surgery, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support from Alberta Innovates and INSA, Lyon, France in conducting this research is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anup Basu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheng, I. et al. (2020). A Gesture-Based Interface for Remote Surgery. In: El Saddik, A., Hossain, M., Kantarci, B. (eds) Connected Health in Smart Cities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27844-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27844-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27843-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27844-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics