Skip to main content

A STEEPLED Analysis of the SPI Manifesto

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1060))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Software Process Improvement (SPI) has been founded on the belief that a well-defined and executed process is likely to produce a high-quality pro-duct. Improving a product might provide insights for future improvement efforts. However, this bottom-up approach does not necessarily lead to improvement, considering in particular that software products/artefacts are usually, unique. In contrast, an improved process is a top-down approach, which is applicable to all products (outputs and outcomes). The SPI Manifesto places people, business focus, and organisational change at the core of Software Process Improvement practices. In so doing, certain SPI principles guide the behaviour of individuals, groups, and organisations in their efforts to improve process. The SPI principles form the basis for elaborating on certain values and serve as a foundation for action in software development. In this paper the authors carry out a STEEPLED [Sociocultural, Technical, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal, Ethical and Demographic] analysis of the SPI Manifesto. STEEPLED is a multidimensional and multi-faceted analysis tool which assists in identifying the strengths, gaps and impact of the SPI Manifesto. Future work for the SPI Manifesto aims at (i) proposing enhancement modifications to its values and principles and (ii) enriching the SPI Manifesto with the addition of a comparative and practical philosophy level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    (http://www.iscn.com/Images/SPI_Manifesto_A.1.2.2010.pdf).

References

  1. Purcell, J., Trumble, B. (eds.): The Oxford English Reference Dictionary. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marx, K., Engels, F.: The Communist Manifesto (1848). Wood, M.: The Communist Manifesto After 150 Years, Millennium Publications (2017). ISBN 978-15084756

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agile Manifesto (2001). https://www.agilealliance.org/agile101/the-agile-manifesto/

  4. SPI Manifesto (2009). http://www.iscn.com/Images/SPI_Manifesto_A.1.2.2010.pdf

  5. Georgiadou, E., Siakas, K., Estdale, J., Berki, E., Rahanu, H., Ross, M.: A comparison of two Manifestos: agile and SPI. In: Khan, O., Marchbank, P., Georgiadou, E., Linecar, P., Ross, M., Staples, G. (eds.) The BCS Proceedings of Software Quality Management XXVII: International Experiences and Initiatives in IT Quality Management. The Annual International Conference of SQM, Southampton (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berki, E., Georgiadou, E.: A comparison of qualitative frameworks for information systems development methodologies. In: The Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of the Israel Society for Quality, 1–3 December 1998, Jerusalem (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berki, E.: Formal metamodelling and agile method engineering in MetaCASE and CAME tool environments. In: Tigka, K., Kefalas, P. (eds.) The 1st South-East European Workshop on Formal Methods. Agile Formal Methods: Practical, Rigorous Methods for a changing world (Satellite of the 1st Balkan Conference in Informatics, 21–23 November 2003, Thessaloniki), pp. 170–188. South-Eastern European Research Center (SEERC) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Siakas, K.V., Georgiadou, E., Berki, E.: Agile methodologies and software process improvement. In: Isaias, P., Baptista-Nunes, M., dos Palma, R.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Virtual Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (MCCSIS 2005) - Software Engineering and Applications (SEA), 11–28 April, Portugal, pp. 412–417. International Association for the Development of Information Society (IADIS) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nummenmaa, T., Tiensuu, A., Berki, E., Mikkonen, T., Kuittinen, J., Kultimaa, A.: Supporting agile development by facilitating natural user interaction with executable formal specifications. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 36(4), 13 (2011). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2003643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mishra, P., Berki, E., Valtanen, J.-P., Lepistö, T., Suomela, T.: Quality deployment and use of the scaled agile framework® – managing teamwork and software quality in the banking sector. In: Khan, O., Marchbank, P., Georgiadou, E., Linecar, P., Ross, M., Staples, G. (eds.) The BCS Proceedings of Software Quality Management XXVII: International Experiences and Initiatives in IT Quality Management. The Annual International Conference of Software Quality Management (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chuang, S.W., Luor, T., Lu, H.P.: Assessment of institutions, scholars, and contributions on agile software development (2001–2012). J. Syst. Softw. 93, 84–101 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V.G., Brede Moe, N.: A decade of agile methodologies: towards explaining agile software development. J. Syst. Softw. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Messnarz, R., Biró, M., Koinig, S., Reiner, M., Vajde-Horvat, R., Ekert, D.: The future of SPI knowledge and networking in Europe – a vision. In: O‘Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2011. CCIS, vol. 172, pp. 268–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22206-1_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Korsaa, M., et al.: The SPI manifesto and the ECQA SPI manager certification scheme. J. Softw. Evol. Proc. 24, 525–540 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.5021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson, G., Scholes, K., Whittington, R.: Exploring Corporate Strategy, 8th edn, pp. 55–57. FT Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson, J., Martin, F.: Strategic Management: Awareness & Change, 6th edn, pp. 86–88, 816. Cengage Learning EMEA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siakas, K., Georgiadou, E., Siakas, D.: The influence of national and organisational culture on knowledge sharing in distributed teams. Int. J. E-Entrepreneurship Innov. 6(1), 19–37 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Siakas, K., Georgiadou, E., Siakas, D., Rahanu, H.: Developing effective teams in global multidiscipline engineering and manufacturing organizations. In: Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2018. CCIS, vol. 896, pp. 565–576. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Spinello, R.A.: Ethical Aspects of Information Technology Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beany, S., Fernandes, S., Petrie, D., Smith, D.: Boosting Finance for Engineering & Technology, the Institution of Engineering & Technology and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (2016). https://www.theiet.org/media/2693/ind-strat.pdf

  21. Norton Rose Fulbright: Impact of Brexit on technology and innovation (2018). https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/b5c7b5cc/impact-of-brexit-on-technology-and-innovation

  22. Kallman, E.A., Grillo, J.P.: Ethical Decision Making & Information Technology: An Introduction with Cases. McGraw-Hill/Irwin (1996). ISBN 10: 0070340900

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spinello, R.: Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace, 5th edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc., (2013). ISBN 10: 1449688411, ISBN 13: 978-1449688417

    Google Scholar 

  24. Breske, E., Schweigert, T.: The SPI manifesto revisited. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 401–410. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Weisbond, M.: Productive Workplaces: Organizing and Managing for Dignity, Meaning and Community. Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elli Georgiadou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Georgiadou, E., Siakas, K., Berki, E., Estdale, J., Rahanu, H., Ross, M. (2019). A STEEPLED Analysis of the SPI Manifesto. In: Walker, A., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1060. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28005-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28004-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28005-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics