Skip to main content

Dynamic Doxastic Differential Dynamic Logic for Belief-Aware Cyber-Physical Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 2019)

Abstract

Cyber-physical systems (CPS), such as airplanes, operate based on sensor and communication data, i.e. on potentially noisy or erroneous beliefs about the world. Realistic CPS models must therefore incorporate the notion of beliefs if they are to provide safety guarantees in practice as well as in theory. To fundamentally address this challenge, this paper introduces a first-principles framework for reasoning about CPS models where control decisions are explicitly driven by controller beliefs arrived at through observation and reasoning. We extend the differential dynamic logic for CPS dynamics with belief modalities, and a learning operator for belief change. This new dynamic doxastic differential dynamic logic does due justice to the challenges of CPS verification by having (1) real arithmetic for describing the world and beliefs about the world; (2) continuous and discrete world change; (3) discrete belief change by means of the learning operator. We develop a sound sequent calculus for , which enables us to illustrate the applicability of by proving the safety of a simplified belief-triggered controller for an airplane.

Supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, NSF grant CNS-1446712, CMU | Portugal grant SFRH/BD/51886/2012, and PTDC/CCI-COM/30952/2017.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Beliefs may be erroneous, knowledge may not.

References

  1. Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau of Ethiopia: Report No. AI-01/19, Aircraft Accident Investigation Preliminary Report, Ethiopian Airlines Group, B737–8 (MAX) Registered ET-AVJ (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symb. Log. 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baltag, A., Moss, L.S.: Logics for epistemic programs. Synthese 139(2), 165–224 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In: TARK, pp. 43–56. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses (BEA): Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the airbus A330–203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 from Rio de Janeiro to Paris (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Ditmarsch, H.P., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.P.: Dynamic epistemic logic with assignment. In: AAMAS, pp. 141–148. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. van Ditmarsch, H.P.: Descriptions of game actions. J. Logic, Lang. Inf. 11(3), 349–365 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer, Netherlands (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fulton, N., Platzer, A.: Verifiably safe off-model reinforcement learning. In: Vojnar, T., Zhang, L. (eds.) TACAS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11427, pp. 413–430. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17462-0_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerbrandy, J., Groeneveld, W.: Reasoning about information change. J. Logic, Lang. Inf. 6(2), 147–169 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Goebel, R., Hespanha, J.P., Teel, A.R., Cai, C., Sanfelice, R.: Hybrid systems: generalized solutions and robust stability. In: Proceedings of the 6th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems, September 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Komite Nasional Keselamatan Transportasi: Preliminary Aircraft Accident Investigation Report, PT. Lion Mentari Airlines, Boeing 737–8 (MAX); PK-LQP (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martins, J.G., Platzer, A., Leite, J.: A sound calculus for a logic of belief-aware cyber-physical systems. Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-19-116, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, July 2019

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mitsch, S., Ghorbal, K., Vogelbacher, D., Platzer, A.: Formal verification of obstacle avoidance and navigation of ground robots I. J. Robotics Res. 36(12), 1312–1340 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen, N.T., Krishnakumar, K.S., Kaneshige, J.T., Nespeca, P.P.: Flight dynamics and hybrid adaptive control of damaged aircraft. J. Guidance Control and Dyn. 31(3), 751–764 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Platzer, A.: Differential dynamic logic for hybrid systems. J. Autom. Reas. 41(2), 143–189 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Platzer, A.: Logics of dynamical systems. In: LICS, pp. 13–24. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Platzer, A.: Logic & proofs for cyber-physical systems. In: Olivetti, N., Tiwari, A. (eds.) IJCAR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9706, pp. 15–21. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40229-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Platzer, A.: Logical Foundations of Cyber-Physical Systems. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63588-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Platzer, A., Tan, Y.K.: Differential equation axiomatization: the impressive power of differential ghosts. In: Dawar, A., Grädel, E. (eds.) LICS, pp. 819–828. ACM, New York (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João G. Martins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martins, J.G., Platzer, A., Leite, J. (2019). Dynamic Doxastic Differential Dynamic Logic for Belief-Aware Cyber-Physical Systems. In: Cerrito, S., Popescu, A. (eds) Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods. TABLEAUX 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11714. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29026-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29026-9_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29025-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29026-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics