Skip to main content

Automatic Vulnerability Identification and Security Installation with Type Checking for Source Code

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Networked-based Information Systems (NBiS - 2019 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1036))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 744 Accesses

Abstract

Cyber security has been an important issue for control systems, however, there may be a shortage of security experts in the near future. Most of security engineering methods focus only at high-level such as architectures, and do not consider the availability of the control system. In addition, it is often difficult use them without security expertise. In this paper, the author proposed a novel method for solving this problem. The method automatically identifies vulnerabilities in a source code using a formal and static method (type-checking), and fixes them by installing security functions accordingly. Since this approach is entirely automated, it can be seamlessly used by regular engineers, i.e. without security expertise. The authors implemented the method and experimentally investigated its effectiveness on a simple example including the characteristics typical of communicating control systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Evans, D., Larochelle, D.: Improving security using extensible lightweight static analysis. IEEE Softw. 19(1), 42–51 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fekade, B., Maksymyuk, T., Kyryk, M., Jo, M.: Probabilistic recovery of incomplete sensed data in IoT. IEEE Internet Things 5(4), 2282–2292 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jürjens, J.: UMLsec: extending UML for secure systems development. In: International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language, pp. 412–425. Springer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Livshits, B., Chong, S.: Towards fully automatic placement of security sanitizers and declassifiers. ACM SIGPLAN Not. 48, 385–398 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lodderstedt, T., Basin, D., Doser, J.: SecureUML: a UML-based modeling language for model-driven security. In: UML 2002 - The Unified Modeling Language, pp. 426–441 (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. McAfee: Hacking the skills shortage: a study of the international shortage in cybersecurity skills. https://www.mcafee.com/content/dam/enterprise/en-us/assets/reports/rp-hackingskills-shortage.pdf

  7. Microsoft: Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool - Microsoft Docs. https://docs.microsoft.com/ja-jp/azure/security/azure-security-threat-modeling-tool

  8. MITRE Corporation: CWE - Common Weakness Enumeration. http://cwe.mitre.org/index.html

  9. Moro, N., Heydemann, K., Encrenaz, E., Robisson, B.: Formal verification of a software countermeasure against instruction skip attacks. J. Cryptogr. Eng. 4(3), 145–156 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Newsome, J., Song, D.X.: Dynamic taint analysis for automatic detection, analysis, and signature generation of exploits on commodity software. In: NDSS, vol. 5, pp. 3–4. Citeseer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. OpenSSL Software Foundation: Cryptography and SSL/TLS - OpenSSL. https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man3/EVP EncryptInit.html

  12. Pedroza, G., Apvrille, L., Knorreck, D.: AVATAR: a SysML environment for the formal verification of safety and security properties. In: 2011 11th Annual International Conference on New Technologies of Distributed Systems, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poirier, C., Kriaa, S., Pebay-Peyroula, F., Mraidha, C., Zille, V.: A tool for I & C system architecture design: the French connexion cluster. In: International Symposium on Future I & C for Nuclear Power Plants/International Symposium on Symbiotic Nuclear Power Systems 2014, pp. 1–7 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sadeghi, A.-R., Wachsmann, C., Waidner, M.: Security and privacy challenges in industrial internet of things. In: 2015 52nd ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Subbrao, M.: Are Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools Glorified Grep? https://www.synopsys.com/content/dam/synopsys/sig-assets/ebooks/are-sast-toolsglorified-grep.pdf

  16. The Clang Team: Introduction to the Clang AST - Clang 9 documentation. https://clang.llvm.org/docs/IntroductionToTheClangAST.html

  17. Zeng, W., Chow, M.-Y.: Optimal tradeoff between performance and security in networked control systems based on coevolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 59(7), 3016–3025 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shun Hinatsu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hinatsu, S., Shimizu, K., Ueda, T., Boyer, B., Mentré, D. (2020). Automatic Vulnerability Identification and Security Installation with Type Checking for Source Code. In: Barolli, L., Nishino, H., Enokido, T., Takizawa, M. (eds) Advances in Networked-based Information Systems. NBiS - 2019 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1036. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29029-0_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics