Skip to main content

REVaMP2 Project: Towards Round-Trip Engineering of Software Product Lines - Approach, Intermediate Results and Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Technology: Methods and Tools (TOOLS 2019)

Abstract

The REVaMP2 Project is a major European effort towards Round-Trip Engineering of Software Product Lines for software intensive systems. Indeed, software is predominant in almost every modern industry. The importance of time-to-market has grown tremendously in many business domains. Organizations are in a constant search for approaches for mass production of highly customizable systems. The software product lines engineering approach promises to provide up to 10× speed increase benefits in time-to-market. Traditionally, automated tools proposed a top-down approach, i.e., variants were generated from a model of the product line. However, the industry used a bottom-up approach that helped to re-create a product line out of various clones of a system. This operation is very costly and error prone. The goal of REVaMP2 is to automate the process of extracting a product line from various system artifacts and help with verification and the co-evolution of the product line. The project involves 27 partners that contribute with diverse research and industrial practices to address case study challenges stemming from 11 application domains. In this paper, we would like to present the motivation for the project, the current approach, the intermediate results and challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sadovykh, A., Bagnato, A., Robin, J., Viehl, A., Ziadi, T., Martinez, J.: REVAMP: challenges and innovation roadmap for variability management in round-trip engineering of software-intensive systems. Revue Genie Logiciel 120, 32–36 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martinez, J., Ziadi, T., Bissyandé, T.F., Klein, J., Le Traon, Y.: Bottom-up adoption of software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line - SPLC 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Apel, S., Batory, D., Kästner, C., Saake, G.: Feature-Oriented Software Product Lines: Concepts and Implementation. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37521-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Krueger, C.W.: Easing the transition to software mass customization. In: van der Linden, F. (ed.) PFE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2290, pp. 282–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47833-7_25

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Linden, F. (ed.): PFE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2290. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47833-7

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kastner, C., Dreiling, A., Ostermann, K.: Variability mining: consistent semi-automatic detection of product-line features. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 40(1), 67–82 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger, T., et al.: A survey of variability modeling in industrial practice. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems - VaMoS 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubinsky, Y., Rubin, J., Berger, T., Duszynski, S., Becker, M., Czarnecki, K.: An exploratory study of cloning in industrial software product lines. In: 2013 17th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. BUT4Reuse. https://but4reuse.github.io/. Accessed 26 June 2019

  10. KernelHaven. https://github.com/KernelHaven/KernelHaven. Accessed 26 June 2019

  11. Buckley, J., Mooney, S., Rosik, J., Ali, N.: JITTAC: a just-in-time tool for architectural consistency. In: 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tom Sawyer Visualization. https://www.tomsawyer.com/products/visualization/. Accessed 26 June 2019

  13. Pure-systems - product line and variant management tools. https://www.pure-systems.com/products/pure-variants-9.html. Accessed 26 June 2019

  14. MES M-XRAY: consistent metrics of models - MES. https://model-engineers.com/en/quality-tools/mxray/. Accessed 26 June 2019

  15. The REUSE company. https://www.reusecompany.com/

  16. SPLA. https://github.com/SPLA/VARIAMOS. Accessed 26 June 2019

  17. Simcenter system simulation. https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/global/fr/products/simcenter/simcenter-system-simulation.html. Accessed 26 June 2019

  18. Swart, S.: Eclipse capra, 28 July 2016. https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.capra. Accessed 26 June 2019

  19. REVAMP2 projects public deliverables. http://www.revamp2-project.eu/publications/public-project-results

  20. Mukelabai, M., Nešić, D., Maro, S., Berger, T., Steghöfer, J.-P.: Tackling combinatorial explosion: a study of industrial needs and practices for analyzing highly configurable systems. In: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering - ASE 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nyberg, M., Gurov, D., Lidström, C., Rasmusson, A., Westman, J.: Formal verification in automotive industry: enablers and obstacles. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11247, pp. 139–158. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03427-6_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Ballarín, M., Marcén, A.C., Pelechano, V., Cetina, C.: Measures to report the location problem of model fragment location. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems – MODELS 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. El-Sharkawy, S., Yamagishi-Eichler, N., Schmid, K.: Metrics for analyzing variability and its implementation in software product lines: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 106, 1–30 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Passos, L., et al.: A study of feature scattering in the Linux Kernel. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. OASIS Variability Exchange Language (VEL) TC | OASIS. https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=vel. Accessed 26 June 2019

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by the ITEA3 15010 REVaMP2 project: FUI the Ile-de-France region and BPI in France, by Vinnova Sweden, and CDTI in Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrey Sadovykh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sadovykh, A. et al. (2019). REVaMP2 Project: Towards Round-Trip Engineering of Software Product Lines - Approach, Intermediate Results and Challenges. In: Mazzara, M., Bruel, JM., Meyer, B., Petrenko, A. (eds) Software Technology: Methods and Tools. TOOLS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11771. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29852-4_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29852-4_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29851-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29852-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics