Skip to main content

Evaluating Impacts of Motion Correction on Deep Learning Approaches for Breast DCE-MRI Segmentation and Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns (CAIP 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 11679))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) is a diagnostic method suited for the early detection and diagnosis of cancer, involving the serial acquisition of images before and after the injection of a paramagnetic contrast agent. Dealing with long acquisition times, DCE-MRI inevitably shows noise (artefacts) in acquired images due to the patient (often involuntary) movements. As a consequence, over the years, machine learning approaches showed that some sort of motion correction technique (MCT) have to be applied in order to improve performance in tumours segmentation and classification. However, in recent times classic machine learning approaches have been outperformed by deep learning based ones, thanks to their ability to autonomously learn the best set of features for the task under analysis. This paper proposes a first investigation to understand if deep learning based approaches are more robust to the misalignment of images over time, making the registration no longer needed in this context. To this aim, we evaluated the effectiveness of a MCT both for the classification and for the segmentation of breast lesions in DCE-MRI by means of some literature proposal. Our results show that while MCTs seems to be still quite useful for the lesion segmentation task, they seem to be no longer strictly required for lesion classification one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. El-Kwae, E.A., Fishman, J.E., Bianchi, M.J., Pattany, P.M., Kabuka, M.R.: Detection of suspected malignant patterns in three-dimensional magnetic resonance breast images. J. Digit. Imaging Off J. Soc. Comput. Appl. Radiol. 11, 83–93 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glorot, X., Bengio, Y.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 249–256 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haarburger, C., et al.: Transfer learning for breast cancer malignancy classification based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2018. I, pp. 216–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56537-7_61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  6. Levman, J., Leung, T., Causer, P., Plewes, D., Martel, A.L.: Classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27, 688–696 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maintz, J., Viergever, M.A.: A survey of medical image registration. Med. Image Anal. 2(1), 1–36 (1998). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841501800268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marrone, S., Piantadosi, G., Fusco, R., Petrillo, A., Sansone, M., Sansone, C.: Automatic lesion detection in breast DCE-MRI. In: Petrosino, A. (ed.) ICIAP 2013. LNCS, vol. 8157, pp. 359–368. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41184-7_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Marrone, S., Piantadosi, G., Fusco, R., Petrillo, A., Sansone, M., Sansone, C.: A novel model-based measure for quality evaluation of image registration techniques in DCE-MRI. In: 2014 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), pp. 209–214. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marrone, S., Piantadosi, G., Fusco, R., Petrillo, A., Sansone, M., Sansone, C.: An investigation of deep learning for lesions malignancy classification in breast DCE-MRI. In: Battiato, S., Gallo, G., Schettini, R., Stanco, F. (eds.) ICIAP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10485, pp. 479–489. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68548-9_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Nodine, C.F., Kundel, H.L., et al.: Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. Radiographics 7(6), 1241–1250 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Penney, G.P., Weese, J., Little, J.A., Desmedt, P., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-d-3-d medical image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17(4), 586–595 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Piantadosi, G., Fusco, R., Petrillo, A., Sansone, M., Sansone, C.: LBP-TOP for volume lesion classification in breast DCE-MRI. In: Murino, V., Puppo, E. (eds.) ICIAP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9279, pp. 647–657. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23231-7_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Piantadosi, G., Marrone, S., Fusco, R., Petrillo, A., Sansone, M., Sansone, C.: Data-driven selection of motion correction techniques in breast DCE-MRI. In: 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), pp. 273–278. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piantadosi, G., Marrone, S., Fusco, R., Sansone, M., Sansone, C.: Comprehensive computer-aided diagnosis for breast T1-weighted DCE-MRI through quantitative dynamical features and spatio-temporal local binary patterns. IET Comput. Vis. 12(7), 1007–1017 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Piantadosi, G., Sansone, M., Sansone, C.: Breast segmentation in MRI via U-Net deep convolutional neural networks. In: 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp. 3917–3922. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosset, A., Spadola, L., Ratib, O.: OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J. Digit. Imaging 17, 205–216 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L.I., Hayes, C., Hill, D.L., Leach, M.O., Hawkes, D.J.: Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18(8), 712–721 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Navaei Lavasani, S., Fathi Kazerooni, A., Saligheh-Rad, H., Gity, M.: Discrimination of benign and malignant suspicious breast tumors based on semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameters employing support vector machine. Front. Biomed. Technol. 2(2), 87–92 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, R.A., et al.: American cancer society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J. Clin. 53(3), 141–169 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanner, C., Hawkes, D.J., Khazen, M., Kessar, P., Leach, M.O.: Does registration improve the performance of a computer aided diagnosis system for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography? In: 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, pp. 466–469. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tofts, P.S.: T1-weighted DCE imaging concepts: modelling, acquisition and analysis. Magneton Flash Siemens 3, 30–39 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Twellmann, T., Saalbach, A., Müller, C., Nattkemper, T.W., Wismüller, A.: Detection of suspicious lesions in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 1, pp. 454–457 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zitová, B., Flusser, J.: Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis. Comput. 21(11), 977–1000 (2003). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0262885603001379

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation with the donation of the Titan Xp GPU used for this research, the availability of the Calculation Centre SCoPE of the University of Naples Federico II and thank the SCoPE academic staff for the given support. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Antonella Petrillo, Head of Division of Radiology and PhD Roberta Fusco, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiant and Metabolic Therapy, “Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale” - IRCCS, Naples, Italy, for providing data. This work is part of the “Synergy-net: Research and Digital Solutions against Cancer” project (funded in the framework of the POR Campania FESR 2014–2020 - CUP B61C17000090007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Marrone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Galli, A., Gravina, M., Marrone, S., Piantadosi, G., Sansone, M., Sansone, C. (2019). Evaluating Impacts of Motion Correction on Deep Learning Approaches for Breast DCE-MRI Segmentation and Classification. In: Vento, M., Percannella, G. (eds) Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns. CAIP 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11679. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29891-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29891-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29890-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29891-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics