Skip to main content

Typical Phraseological Units in Poetic Texts

Frequent Concepts in Works of Poetry and How MWUs Lack Synonyms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology (EUROPHRAS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11755))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 852 Accesses

Abstract

This paper looks at a corpus of British and US poetry, uncovering phraseological units which, through their frequency, are indicators of key con- cepts. Multi-word units (MWUs) have been discussed extensively with reference to corpus-based research, for example by Sinclair (1996) [2004], Biber and Conrad (1999), or, referred to as formulaicity by Wray (2002); O’Keefe et al. (2007), Greaves and Warren (2010) and Pace-Sigge (2015) describe MWUs preferred in different spoken and written genres. So far, however, there has been very little research in how far MWUs appear in the sub-genre of imaginative writing, namely, poetry. A commonly held view is that poetry by definition should not be yielding patterns- it subverts every pattern linguistically speaking that it can. Through focus on the main themes surfacing in multiword units, this research looks at usages found in poetic texts in-depth and compares sets of words found with their occurrence patterns in prose literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thorne, S.: Mastering Poetry. Red Globe Press, Houndmills (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Hutchings, W.: Living Poetry. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Louw, B.: Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In: Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, pp. 240–251 (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Pace-Sigge, M.: Typical phraseological units in poetic texts. A case study on some frequent concepts in works of poetry. J. Res. Des. Stat. Linguist. Commun. Sci. (Forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parrish, A.: A Gutenberg Poetry Corpus (2018). https://github.com/aparrish/gutenberg-poetry-corpus. Accessed 09 Nov 2018

  6. Patterson, K.J.: The analysis of metaphor: to what extent can the theory of lexical priming help our understanding of metaphor usage and comprehension? J. Psycholinguist. Res. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9343-1. Accessed 08 May 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Halloran, K.: Corpus-assisted literary evaluation. Corpora 2(1), 33–63 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2007.2.1.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McIntyre, D., Walker, B.: How can corpora be used to explore the language of poetry and drama? In: O’Keefe, A., McCarthy, M. (eds.) The Routledge Hand-Book of Corpus Linguistics, pp. 544–558. Routledge, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scott, M.: Wordsmith Tools version 7. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software (2004). www.lexically.net. Accessed 02 July 2019

  10. Rayson, P.: Log-likelihood and effect size calculator. Excel spreadsheet. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sardinha, T.B.: Lexical Priming and Register Variation. In: Pace-Sigge, M., Patterson, K.J. (eds.) Lexical Priming: Applications and Advances, pp. 189–230. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moon, R.: Sinclair, lexicography, and the Cobuild project: the application of theory. Int. J. Corpus Linguist. 12(2), 159–181 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pace-Sigge, M.: The Function and Use of TO and OF in Multi-word Units. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Pace-Sigge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pace-Sigge, M. (2019). Typical Phraseological Units in Poetic Texts. In: Corpas Pastor, G., Mitkov, R. (eds) Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology. EUROPHRAS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11755. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30135-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30135-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30134-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30135-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics