Skip to main content

Toward the Automatic Correction of Short Answer Questions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2019 (AISI 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1058))

  • 2333 Accesses

Abstract

The manual correction for short answer questions is a tedious and time consuming task. This issue leads to the importance of having automatic correction systems for short answer questions. Thus this paper proposes three different approaches for correcting short answer questions. One of them is NLP-based while the others are machine learning based approaches. The three approaches are tested and compared across another two short answer correction systems that are evaluated on the same dataset. Results show that the proposed approaches outperform others that are evaluated on the same dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://github.com/jflanigan/jamr

  2. 2.

    Available at: http://research.microsoft.com/msrsplat

  3. 3.

    Smatch: amr.isi.edu/evaluation.html

  4. 4.

    https://web.eecs.umich.edu/~mihalcea/downloads.html

References

  1. Mohler, F., Mihalcea, R.: Text-to-text semantic similarity for automatic short answer grading. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, Association for Computational Linguistics, Athens, Greece, pp. 567–575 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Siddiqi, R.: Impact of Automated short-answer marking on students’ learning: IndusMarker, a case study. In: International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gomaa, W.H., Fahmy, A.A.: Automatic Arabic Essay Assessment. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Computer Science, Cairo University (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: C-rater: automated scoring of short-answer questions. Comput. Humanit. 37 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.: Deep Learning. MIT Press, New York (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Gomaa, W., Fahmy, A.: Short answer grading using string similarity and corpus-based similarity. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cai, S., Knight, K.: Smatch: an evaluation metric for semantic feature structures. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 748–752 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vanderwende, A., Menezes, A., Quirk, V.: An AMR parser for English, French, German, Spanish and Japanese and a new AMR-annotated corpus. In: Microsoft Research, Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2015, pp. 26–30 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473 (2014)

  10. Du, K.L., Swamy, M.N.S.: Neural Networks and Statistical Learning. Chap. 11, Canada, pp. 351–363 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mueller, J., Thyagarajan, A.: Siamese Recurrent architectures for learning sentence similarity. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Attia, Z.E., Arafa, W., Gheith, M.: An automatic short answer correction system based on the course material. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst. 11(3) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hu, B., Lu, Z., Li, H., Chen, Q.: Convolutional neural network architectures for matching natural language sentences. In: NIPS (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, Z., Yang, D., Dyer, C., He, X., Smola, A., Hovy, E.: Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. In: Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 1480–1489 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Flanigan, J., Thomson, S., Carbonell, J., Dyer, C., Smith, N.A.: A discriminative graph-based parser for the abstract meaning representation. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1426–1436 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salehinejad, H., Sankar, S., Barfett, J., Colak, E., Valaee, S.: Recent Advances in Recurrent Neural Networks. arXiv:1801.01078 (2018)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeinab E. Attia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Attia, Z.E., Arafa, W., Gheith, M. (2020). Toward the Automatic Correction of Short Answer Questions. In: Hassanien, A., Shaalan, K., Tolba, M. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2019. AISI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1058. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31129-2_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics