Skip to main content

Understanding the Habits: Inertia in Flipped Classroom

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 365))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The digitalization increasingly determines the way knowledge is conveyed at universities. A concept resulting from this is Flipped Classroom (FC) that reverses the structure of the classical teaching concept and integrates the use of digital media. The introduction of new concepts is often challenging and therefore associated with inertia. We have examined the structure of inertia in a FC course with the aim of a better understanding of which components favor the adherence to old habits. The empirical analysis of a questionnaire carried out led to two important results. First there was no cognitively based inertia observed in the course. The tendency to status quo results purely from emotional and routine-based motivations in the course. Secondly, we were able to make conclusions about the different factors influencing affective and behavioral inertia, which among other findings showed a clearer division of the perceived value in the Flipped Classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A.: Race Against the Machine. Digital Frontier, Lexington (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pareja-Lora, A., Calle-Martínez, C., Rodríguez-Arancón, P.: New perspectives on teaching and working with languages in the digital era. Research-publishing.net (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann, J., Sams, A.: Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education, Alexandria (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Handke, J., Sperl, A. (eds.): Das Inverted Classroom Model: Begleitband zur ersten deutschen ICM-Konferenz. Oldenbourg, München (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vogelsang, K., Hoppe, U.: Development of an evaluation for flipped classroom courses. In: Proceeding of Multikonferenz der Wirtschaftsinformatik (mkwi), pp. 821–832 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rafferty, A.E., Jimmieson, N.L.: Subjective perceptions of organizational change and employee resistance to change: direct and mediated relationships with employee well-being. Br. J. Manage. 28, 248–264 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pardo del Val, M., Martínez Fuentes, C.: Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study. Manag. decis. 41, 148–155 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Polites, G.L., Karahanna, E.: Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Q. 36, 21–42 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baytiyeh, H., Naja, M.K.: Students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom model in an engineering course: a case study. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 42, 1048–1061 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abrahams, D.A.: Technology adoption in higher education: a framework for identifying and prioritising issues and barriers to adoption of instructional technology. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 2, 34 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bishop, J.L., Verleger, M.A.: The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In: ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, pp. 1–18 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schryen, G.: Writing qualitative is literature reviews—guidelines for synthesis, interpretation, and guidance of research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37, 286–325 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, E.: Flipped classroom learning outcomes in intro to is class: looking at student outcomes and professor performance evaluations. In: IAIM Conferenc Proceedings (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Song, Y., Kapur, M.: How to flip the classroom - “productive failure or traditional flipped classroom” pedagogical design? J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 20, 292–305 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vogelsang, K., Droit, A., Liere-Netheler, K., Hoppe, U.: Designing a flipped classroom course - a process model. In: Proceedings of the Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2019), Siegen (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mahoney, E., Zappe, S., Butler Velegol, S.: The evolution of a flipped classroom: evidence-based recommendations. Adv. Eng. Educ. 4, 1–37 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mattis, K.V.: Flipped classroom versus traditional textbook instruction: assessing accuracy and mental effort at different levels of mathematical complexity. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 20, 231–248 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9238-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gillette, C., Rudolph, M., Kimble, C., Rockich-Winston, N., Smith, L., Broedel-Zaugg, K.: A systematic review and meta-analysis of student pharmacist outcomes comparing flipped classroom and lecture. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6898

  19. Baker, E.W., Hill, S.: Investigating student resistance and student perceptions of course quality and instructor performance in a flipped information systems classroom. Inf. Syst. Educ. J. 15, 17–26 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gibson, C.F.: IT-enabled business change: an approach to understanding and managing risk. MIS Q. Executive 2, 6 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ye, C., Seo, D., Desouza, K., Papagari, S., Jha, S.: Post-adoption switching between technology substitutes: the case of web browsers. In: ICIS 2006 Proceedings, pp. 1940–1958 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Murray, K.B., Häubl, G.: Explaining cognitive lock-in: the role of skill-based habits of use in consumer choice. J. Consum. Res. 34, 77–88 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wood, W., Neal, D.T.: The habitual consumer. J. Consum. Psychol. 19, 579–592 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rumelt, R.P.: Precis of inertia and transformation. In: Montgomery, C.A. (ed.) Resources in an Evolutionary Perspective: Towards a Synthesis of Evolutionary and Resource-Based Approaches to Strategy, pp. 101–132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Polites, G.L., Karahanna, E.: The embeddedness of information systems habits in organizational and individual level routines: development and disruption. MIS Q. 37, 221–246 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smollan, R.: Engaging with resistance to change. Univ. Auckland Bus. Rev. 13, 12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barnes, W., Gartland, M., Stack, M.: Old habits die hard: path dependency and behavioral lock-in. J. Econ. Issues 38, 371–377 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, K.: Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective. MIS Q. 33, 567 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2307/20650309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2, 192–222 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bovey, W.H., Hede, A.: Resistance to organisational change: the role of defence mechanisms. J. Manag. Psychol. 16, 534–548 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones, M.A., Reynolds, K.E., Mothersbaugh, D.L., Beatty, S.E.: The positive and negative effects of switching costs on relational outcomes. J. Serv. Res. 9, 335–355 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A.: Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q. 15, 125–143 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., Angst, C.M.: Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance. MIS Q. 30, 781–804 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vogelsang, K., Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., Hoppe, U.: Barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: development of a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. D’Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., von Tunzelmann, N.: What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Res. Policy 41, 482–488 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tan, E., Pearce, N.: Open education videos in the classroom: exploring the opportunities and barriers to the use of YouTube in teaching introductory sociology. Res. Learn. Technol. 19, 7783 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19s1/7783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shnai, I.: Systematic review of challenges and gaps in flipped classroom implementation: toward future model enhancement. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning ECEL, pp. 484–490 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Voigt, C., Vogelsang, K., Liere-Netheler, K., Blömer, L., Brink, H., Hoppe, U. (2019). Understanding the Habits: Inertia in Flipped Classroom. In: Pańkowska, M., Sandkuhl, K. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 365. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31143-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31143-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31142-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31143-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics