Abstract
The digitalization increasingly determines the way knowledge is conveyed at universities. A concept resulting from this is Flipped Classroom (FC) that reverses the structure of the classical teaching concept and integrates the use of digital media. The introduction of new concepts is often challenging and therefore associated with inertia. We have examined the structure of inertia in a FC course with the aim of a better understanding of which components favor the adherence to old habits. The empirical analysis of a questionnaire carried out led to two important results. First there was no cognitively based inertia observed in the course. The tendency to status quo results purely from emotional and routine-based motivations in the course. Secondly, we were able to make conclusions about the different factors influencing affective and behavioral inertia, which among other findings showed a clearer division of the perceived value in the Flipped Classroom.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A.: Race Against the Machine. Digital Frontier, Lexington (2011)
Pareja-Lora, A., Calle-Martínez, C., Rodríguez-Arancón, P.: New perspectives on teaching and working with languages in the digital era. Research-publishing.net (2016)
Bergmann, J., Sams, A.: Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education, Alexandria (2012)
Handke, J., Sperl, A. (eds.): Das Inverted Classroom Model: Begleitband zur ersten deutschen ICM-Konferenz. Oldenbourg, München (2012)
Vogelsang, K., Hoppe, U.: Development of an evaluation for flipped classroom courses. In: Proceeding of Multikonferenz der Wirtschaftsinformatik (mkwi), pp. 821–832 (2018)
Rafferty, A.E., Jimmieson, N.L.: Subjective perceptions of organizational change and employee resistance to change: direct and mediated relationships with employee well-being. Br. J. Manage. 28, 248–264 (2017)
Pardo del Val, M., Martínez Fuentes, C.: Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study. Manag. decis. 41, 148–155 (2003)
Polites, G.L., Karahanna, E.: Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Q. 36, 21–42 (2012)
Baytiyeh, H., Naja, M.K.: Students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom model in an engineering course: a case study. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 42, 1048–1061 (2017)
Abrahams, D.A.: Technology adoption in higher education: a framework for identifying and prioritising issues and barriers to adoption of instructional technology. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 2, 34 (2010)
Bishop, J.L., Verleger, M.A.: The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In: ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, pp. 1–18 (2013)
Schryen, G.: Writing qualitative is literature reviews—guidelines for synthesis, interpretation, and guidance of research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37, 286–325 (2015)
Baker, E.: Flipped classroom learning outcomes in intro to is class: looking at student outcomes and professor performance evaluations. In: IAIM Conferenc Proceedings (2014)
Song, Y., Kapur, M.: How to flip the classroom - “productive failure or traditional flipped classroom” pedagogical design? J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 20, 292–305 (2017)
Vogelsang, K., Droit, A., Liere-Netheler, K., Hoppe, U.: Designing a flipped classroom course - a process model. In: Proceedings of the Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2019), Siegen (2019)
Mahoney, E., Zappe, S., Butler Velegol, S.: The evolution of a flipped classroom: evidence-based recommendations. Adv. Eng. Educ. 4, 1–37 (2015)
Mattis, K.V.: Flipped classroom versus traditional textbook instruction: assessing accuracy and mental effort at different levels of mathematical complexity. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 20, 231–248 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9238-0
Gillette, C., Rudolph, M., Kimble, C., Rockich-Winston, N., Smith, L., Broedel-Zaugg, K.: A systematic review and meta-analysis of student pharmacist outcomes comparing flipped classroom and lecture. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6898
Baker, E.W., Hill, S.: Investigating student resistance and student perceptions of course quality and instructor performance in a flipped information systems classroom. Inf. Syst. Educ. J. 15, 17–26 (2017)
Gibson, C.F.: IT-enabled business change: an approach to understanding and managing risk. MIS Q. Executive 2, 6 (2008)
Ye, C., Seo, D., Desouza, K., Papagari, S., Jha, S.: Post-adoption switching between technology substitutes: the case of web browsers. In: ICIS 2006 Proceedings, pp. 1940–1958 (2006)
Murray, K.B., Häubl, G.: Explaining cognitive lock-in: the role of skill-based habits of use in consumer choice. J. Consum. Res. 34, 77–88 (2007)
Wood, W., Neal, D.T.: The habitual consumer. J. Consum. Psychol. 19, 579–592 (2009)
Rumelt, R.P.: Precis of inertia and transformation. In: Montgomery, C.A. (ed.) Resources in an Evolutionary Perspective: Towards a Synthesis of Evolutionary and Resource-Based Approaches to Strategy, pp. 101–132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1994)
Polites, G.L., Karahanna, E.: The embeddedness of information systems habits in organizational and individual level routines: development and disruption. MIS Q. 37, 221–246 (2013)
Smollan, R.: Engaging with resistance to change. Univ. Auckland Bus. Rev. 13, 12 (2011)
Barnes, W., Gartland, M., Stack, M.: Old habits die hard: path dependency and behavioral lock-in. J. Econ. Issues 38, 371–377 (2004)
Kim, K.: Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective. MIS Q. 33, 567 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2307/20650309
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)
Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2, 192–222 (1991)
Bovey, W.H., Hede, A.: Resistance to organisational change: the role of defence mechanisms. J. Manag. Psychol. 16, 534–548 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006166
Jones, M.A., Reynolds, K.E., Mothersbaugh, D.L., Beatty, S.E.: The positive and negative effects of switching costs on relational outcomes. J. Serv. Res. 9, 335–355 (2007)
Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A.: Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q. 15, 125–143 (1991)
Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., Angst, C.M.: Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance. MIS Q. 30, 781–804 (2006)
Vogelsang, K., Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., Hoppe, U.: Barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: development of a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019)
D’Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., von Tunzelmann, N.: What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Res. Policy 41, 482–488 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.008
Tan, E., Pearce, N.: Open education videos in the classroom: exploring the opportunities and barriers to the use of YouTube in teaching introductory sociology. Res. Learn. Technol. 19, 7783 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19s1/7783
Shnai, I.: Systematic review of challenges and gaps in flipped classroom implementation: toward future model enhancement. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning ECEL, pp. 484–490 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Voigt, C., Vogelsang, K., Liere-Netheler, K., Blömer, L., Brink, H., Hoppe, U. (2019). Understanding the Habits: Inertia in Flipped Classroom. In: Pańkowska, M., Sandkuhl, K. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 365. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31143-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31143-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31142-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31143-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)