Skip to main content

Using Modeled Cyber-Physical Systems for Independent Review of Intrusion Detection Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
National Cyber Summit (NCS) Research Track (NCS 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1055))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, the author proposes a methodology to perform comparison and validation of proposed intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPSs) designed for cyber-physical systems (CPSs). This approach consists of a software model of a CPS, as well as a variety of sample cyber attacks and a metric for comparing IDS/IPS performance. Securing critical infrastructure from cyber attack is an important step in reducing the likelihood of a system failure and the resulting losses of property and human life. Independent review is necessary in the scientific research process to determine the viability of proposed solutions, their reproducibility, and their usefulness when compared to other potential defenses. The design of the model and test attacks are complex enough to show their impacts, yet simplistic enough to allow researchers to easily reproduce them and to focus instead on the results of their testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barbará, D., Wu, N., Jajodia, S.: Detecting novel network intrusions using Bayes estimators. In: Proceedings of Siam Conference on Data Mining (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pan, S., Morris, T., Adhikari, U.: A specification-based intrusion detection framework for cyber-physical environment in electric power system. Int. J. Netw. Secur. 17(2), 174–188 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garitano, I., et al.: A review of SCADA anomaly detection systems. In: 6th International Conference SOCO - Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications, pp. 357–366 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fovino, I.N., et al.: Modbus/DNP3 state-based intrusion detection system. In: 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp. 729–736 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adhikari, U., Morris, T., Pan, S.: Applying non-nested generalized exemplars classification for cyber-power event and intrusion detection. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9(5), 3928–3941 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang, D., Usynin, A., Hines, J.W.: Anomaly-based intrusion detection for SCADA systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation Controls, and Human Machine Interface Technology, pp. 797–803, 12–16 November 2006

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alves, T., Morris, T.: OpenPLC: an IEC 61131-3 compliant open source industrial controller for cyber security research. Comput. Secur. 78, 364–379 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Düssel, P., et al.: Cyber-critical infrastructure protection using real-time payload-based anomaly detection. In: Rome, E., Bloomfield, R. (eds.) Critical Information Infrastructures Security (CRITIS). LNCS, vol. 6027. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richey, D.J.: Leveraging PLC ladder logic for signature based IDS rule generation. MS thesis, Mississippi State University, Starkville (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, W.: Cyberthreats, attacks and intrusion detection in supervisory control and data acquisition networks. Ph.D. dissertation, Mississippi State University, Starkville (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denning, D.: An intrusion-detection model. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-13(2), 222–232 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Igure, V., Laughter, S., Williams, R.: Security issues in SCADA networks. Comput. Secur. 25, 498–506 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alves, T., Das, R., Morris, T.: Virtualization of industrial control system testbeds for cybersecurity. Presented at ICSS 2016, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 06 December 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morris, T., et al.: A control system testbed to validate critical infrastructure protection concepts. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 4, 88–103 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alves, T.: OpenPLC: towards a fully open and secure programmable logic controller. Ph.D. dissertation, ECE, UAH, Huntsville (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. John, K., Tiegelkamp, M.: IEC 61131-3: Programming Industrial Automation Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu, B., Sastry, S.: SCADA-specific intrusion detection/prevention systems: a survey and taxonomy. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Secure Control System (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ScadaBR: Principle Functionalities (in Portuguese). http://www.scadabr.com.br/. Accessed 5 Mar 2019

  19. Zhu, B.: A taxonomy of cyber attacks on SCADA systems. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Internet of Things and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, pp. 380–388 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell, R., Chen, I.: A survey of intrusion detection techniques for cyber-physical systems. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 46(4), Article no. 55 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nayak, G., Samaddar, S.: Different flavours of man-in-the-middle attack, consequences and feasible solutions. In: 2010 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, Chengdu, China, 9–11 July 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ettercap: Homepage. https://www.ettercap-project.org/. Accessed 10 Mar 2018

  23. Plummer, D.: An ethernet address resolution protocol. Network Working Group Request For Comments: 826, November 1982

    Google Scholar 

  24. Papp, D., et al.: Embedded systems security: threats, vulnerabilities, and attack taxonomy. In: 2015 13th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reaves, B., Morris, T.: Analysis and mitigation of vulnerabilities in short-range wireless communications for industrial control systems. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 5(3–4), 154–174 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alves, T., Das, R., Morris, T.: Embedding encryption and machine learning intrusion prevention systems on programmable logic controllers. IEEE Embedded Syst. Lett. 10(3), 99–102 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. abatishkev: LOIC. SourceForge: https://sourceforge.net/projects/loic/. Accessed 24 Apr 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SueAnne Griffith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Griffith, S., Morris, T.H. (2020). Using Modeled Cyber-Physical Systems for Independent Review of Intrusion Detection Systems. In: Choo, KK., Morris, T., Peterson, G. (eds) National Cyber Summit (NCS) Research Track. NCS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1055. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31239-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics