Skip to main content

Machine Learning Cyberattack Strategies with Petri Nets with Players, Strategies, and Costs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
National Cyber Summit (NCS) Research Track (NCS 2019)

Abstract

A model of a structured query language injection attack was designed using the Petri nets with players, strategies, and costs formalism. The formalism models the attacker and defender as competing players that can observe a specific subset of the net and act by changing the transition firing rates that the respective player can control. This model of the attack was based on the Common Attack Pattern and Enumeration Classification database and was validated by a panel of subject matter experts to be representative of a structured query language injection attack. The model was simulated with a reinforcement learning algorithm using an \(\upvarepsilon \)-greedy selection method. The algorithm learned within each iteration an optimal solution by varying player-controlled transitions rates. This paper describes the validation of the model, the design of the algorithm, and the results from 4 different \(\upvarepsilon \)-values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Banks, J., Carson, J.S., Nelson, B.L., Nicol, D.M., Banks, C.M.: Discrete-Event System Simulation, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bland, J.A.: Machine learning of cyberattack and strategies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Alabama in Huntsville (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bland, J.A., Mayfield, K.P., Petty, M.D., Whitaker, T.S.: Validating Petri Net models of common attack pattern enumeration and classification. In: Proceedings of the 2017 AlaSim International Conference and Exposition, Huntsville, AL (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cantrell, W.A., Mayfield, K.P., Petty, M.D., Whitaker, T.S., Bland, J.A.: Structured face validation of extended Petri Nets for modeling cyberattacks. In: Proceedings of the 2017 AlaSim International Conference and Exposition, Huntsville, AL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferragut, E.M., Brady, A.C., Brady, E.J., Ferragut, J.M., Ferragut, N.M., Wildgruber, M.C.: HackAttack: game-theoretic analysis of realistic cyber conflicts. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Cyber and Information Security Research Conference, no. 1, p. 8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897795.2897801. http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.04389

  6. Henry, M.H., Layer, R.M., Snow, K.Z., Zaret, D.R.: Evaluating the risk of cyber attacks on SCADA systems via Petri Net analysis with application to hazardous liquid loading operations. In: 2009 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, HST 2009, pp 607–614 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2009.5168093

  7. Lin, C., Wang, Y.: A stochastic game nets based approach for network security analysis. In: 29th International Conference on Application and Theory of Petri Nets and other Models of Concurrency, pp. 21–34 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayfield, K.P., Petty, M.D., Bland, J.A., Whitaker, T.S.: Composition of cyberattack models. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computer Applications in Industry and Engineering, New Orleans, LA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mayfield, K.P., Petty, M.D., Whitaker, T.S., Bland, J.A., Cantrell, W.A.: Component-based implementation of cyberattack simulation models. In: Proceedings of the ACM SouthEast 2019 Conference. Association for Computing Machinery, Kennesaw, GA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3299815.3314435. ISBN 978-1-4503-6251-1

  10. Mitchell, R., Chen, I.R.: Modeling and analysis of attacks and counter defense mechanisms for cyber physical systems. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 65(1), 350–358 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2015.2406860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MITRE: CAPEC - Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification (CAPEC) (2018). https://capec.mitre.org/

  12. OWASP: Open Web Application Security Project (2019). https://www.owasp.org/

  13. Sutton, R., Barto, A.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zakrzewska, A.N., Ferragut, E.M.: Modeling cyber conflicts using an extended Petri Net formalism. In: IEEE SSCI 2011: Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence - CICS 2011: 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Cyber Security, pp. 60–67 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/CICYBS.2011.5949385

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Bland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bland, J.A., Colvett, C.D., Cantrell, W.A., Mayfield, K.P., Petty, M.D., Whitaker, T.S. (2020). Machine Learning Cyberattack Strategies with Petri Nets with Players, Strategies, and Costs. In: Choo, KK., Morris, T., Peterson, G. (eds) National Cyber Summit (NCS) Research Track. NCS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1055. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31239-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics