Skip to main content

New Complexity Results on Aggregating Lexicographic Preference Trees Using Positional Scoring Rules

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11834))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 473 Accesses

Abstract

Aggregating votes that are preference orders over candidates or alternatives is a fundamental problem of decision theory and social choice. We study this problem in the setting when alternatives are described as tuples of values of attributes. The combinatorial spaces of such alternatives make explicit enumerations of alternatives from the most to the least preferred infeasible. Instead, votes may be specified implicitly in terms of some compact and intuitive preference representation mechanism. In our work, we assume that votes are given as lexicographic preference trees and consider two preference-aggregation problems, the winner problem and the evaluation problem. We study them under the assumption that positional scoring rules are used for aggregation. In particular, we consider k-Approval and b-Borda, a generalized Borda rule, and we discover new computational complexity results for them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Given a set \(\varPhi \) of n 2-clauses \(\{ C_1,\ldots ,C_n \}\) over a set of propositional variables \(\{ X_1,\ldots ,X_p \}\), and a positive integer l (\(l \le n\)), decide whether there is a truth assignment that satisfies at most l clauses in \(\varPhi \).

  2. 2.

    We will build \(P_i\) according to what \(C_i\) contains: the two atoms in \(C_i\) are the labels of the top two levels of trees, and whether the atom is negated affects the preference on that atom.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J., Sen, A., Suzumura, K.: Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Booth, R., Chevaleyre, Y., Lang, J., Mengin, J., Sombattheera, C.: Learning conditionally lexicographic preference relations. In: ECAI, pp. 269–274 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: a tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 21 , 135–191 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Brams, S.J., Fishburn, P.C.: Voting procedures. In: Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., Suzumura, K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1, pp. 173–236. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Saint-Cyr, F.D.D., Lang, J., Schiex, T.: Penalty logic and its link with dempster-shafer theory. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: A brief overview of possibilistic logic. In: ECSQARU, pp. 53–57 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fargier, H., Conitzer, V., Lang, J., Mengin, J., Schmidt, N.: Issue-by-issue voting: an experimental evaluation. In: MPREF (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Souhila, K.: Working with Preferences: Less Is More. Cognitive Technologies, Springer, Berlin (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17280-9

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lang, J., Mengin, J., Xia, L.: Aggregating conditionally lexicographic preferences on multi-issue domains. In: CP, pp. 973–987 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lang, J., Mengin, J., Xia, L.: Voting on multi-issue domains with conditionally lexicographic preferences. Artif. Intell. 265 , 18–44 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, X., Truszczynski, M.: Aggregating conditionally lexicographic preferences using answer set programming solvers. In: Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A. (eds.) ADT 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8176, pp. 244–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41575-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, X., Truszczynski, M.: Learning partial lexicographic preference trees over combinatorial domains. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1539–1545. AAAI Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, X., Truszczynski, M.: Preference learning and optimization for partial lexicographic preference forests over combinatorial domains. In: Ferrarotti, F., Woltran, S. (eds.) FoIKS 2018. LNCS, vol. 10833, pp. 284–302. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90050-6_16

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmitt, M., Martignon, L.: On the complexity of learning lexicographic strategies. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7 , 55–83 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work of the second author was supported by the NSF grant IIS-1618783.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xudong Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, X., Truszczynski, M. (2019). New Complexity Results on Aggregating Lexicographic Preference Trees Using Positional Scoring Rules. In: Pekeč, S., Venable, K.B. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11834. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31489-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31489-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31488-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31489-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics