Skip to main content

Combined Feedback-Feed Forward Control Strategy for a Knee Rehabilitation Device with Soft Actuation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 613))

  • 511 Accesses

Abstract

Assistive devices for rehabilitation purposes have gained much attention in robotics research. Using actuation systems that include compliant elements, provide advantages such as natural motions of robotic devices and safety in the interaction with people. These actuation systems are called soft actuators. There are parallel elastic actuators (PEA), series elastic actuators (SEA) and variable stiffness actuators (VSA), which differ among them by the position of the compliant element and the possibility of changing the stiffness online. We have designed a five-bar-linkage knee rehabilitation system which uses the advantages of soft actuation. To accomplish desired tasks in a proper manner, using automatic systems, control strategies are required. In our case, this means to reproduce the desired motions without affecting the patient. In this way, the control system is crucial. In this chapter, we present a combined feedback-feedforward control strategy for the knee rehabilitation device designed. This work was partially presented before in [16], where we discussed the strategy and presented some simulation results. In this chapter we extend the results, presenting experimental trials to validate the performance of the controller and the behavior of the system. The goal of the proposed strategy is to control the system while maintaining the intrinsic softness of the actuators when the patient is in the rehabilitation process. The feedback control strategy acts in a defined threshold to maintain the stiffness of the system, and it is combined with a feed-forward decision control to reject disturbances. The simulations and the experimental results presented are obtained from the analysis of a One-Degree-of-Freedom (DoF) soft actuated system, to allow us to have an insight of the controller and the system, without losing generality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.who.int/.

  2. 2.

    https://qbrobotics.com/products/qbmove-advanced.

References

  1. Andrade AO, Pereira AA, Walter S, Almeida R, Loureiro R, Compagna D, Kyberd PJ (2014) Bridging the gap between robotic technology and health care. Biomed Signal Process Control 10:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2013.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balasubramanian S, Wei R, Perez M, Shepard B, Koeneman E, Koeneman J, He J (2008) Rupert: an exoskeleton robot for assisting rehabilitation of arm functions. In: 2008 virtual rehabilitation, pp 163–167, August 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVR.2008.4625154

  3. Catalano MG, Grioli G, Garabini M, Bonomo F, Mancini M, Tsagarakis N, Bicchi A (2011) VSA-cubebot: a modular variable stiffness platform for multiple degrees of freedom robots. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 5090–5095, May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  4. De-Luca A, Flacco F (2011) A PD-type regulator with exact gravity cancellation for robots with flexible joints. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 317–323, May 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979615

  5. Della-Santina C, Bianchi M, Grioli G, Angelini F, Catalano MG, Garabini M, Bicchi A (2017) Controlling soft robots: balancing feedback and feedforward elements. IEEE Robot Automat Mag 24(3):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2636360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grioli G, Wolf S, Garabini M, Catalano M, Burdet E, Caldwell D, Carloni R, Friedl W, Grebenstein M, Laffranchi M, Lefeber D, Stramigioli S, Tsagarakis N, van Damme M, Vanderborght B, Albu-Schaeffer A, Bicchi A (2015) Variable stiffness actuators: the user’s point of view. Int J Robot Res 34(6):727–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364914566515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamwal PK, Hussain S, Ghayesh MH, Rogozina SV (2016) Impedance control of an intrinsically compliant parallel ankle rehabilitation robot. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 63(6):3638–3647. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2016.2521600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen GM, Lorish CD (1994) Promoting patient cooperation with exercise programs. Linking research, theory, and practice. Arthritis Rheum 7:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koller-Hodac A, Leonardo D, Walpen S, Felder D (2010) A novel robotic device for knee rehabilitation improved physical therapy through automated process. In: 2010 3rd IEEE RAS EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, pp 820–824, September 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2010.5628057

  10. Mghames S, Laghi M, Santina CD, Garabini M, Catalano M, Grioli G, Bicchi A (2017) Design, control and validation of the variable stiffness exoskeleton flexo. In: 2017 international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), pp 539–546, July 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009304

  11. Ozparpucu MC, Albu-Schaffer A (2014) Optimal control strategies for maximizing the performance of variable stiffness joints with nonlinear springs. In: 53rd IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1409–1416, December 2014

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petit F, Albu-Schäffer A (2011) State feedback damping control for a multi DOF variable stiffness robot arm. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 5561–5567, May 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980207

  13. Petit F, Daasch A, Albu-Schäffer A (2015) Backstepping control of variable stiffness robots. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 23(6):2195–2202. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2015.2404894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Romero A ML, Valbuena Y, Velasco A, Solaque L (2017) Soft-actuated modular knee-rehabilitation device: proof of concept. In: Proceedings of the international conference on bioinformatics research and applications 2017, ICBRA 2017, pp 71–78. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3175587.3175593, https://doi.org/10.1145/3175587.3175593

  15. Santina CD, Piazza C, Gasparri GM, Bonilla M, Catalano MG, Grioli G, Garabini M, Bicchi A (2017) The quest for natural machine motion: an open platform to fast-prototyping articulated soft robots. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 24(1):48–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2636366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Solaque L, Romero M, Velasco A (2018) Knee rehabilitation device with soft actuation: an approach to the motion control. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on informatics in control, automation and robotics - volume 2: ICINCO, pp 156–162. INSTICC, SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006861001660172

  17. Umivale PS (2011) Patología de la rodilla: Guía de manejo clínico

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vouga T, Zhuang KZ, Olivier J, Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MAL, Bouri M, Bleuler H (2017) EXiO: a brain-controlled lower limb exoskeleton for rhesus macaques. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25(2):131–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2659654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilkening A, Baiden D, Ivlev O (2011) Assistive control of motion therapy devices based on pneumatic soft-actuators with rotary elastic chambers. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 1–6, June 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975361

  20. Wimboeck T, Ott C, Hirzinger G (2010) Immersion and invariance control for an antagonistic joint with nonlinear mechanical stiffness. In: 49th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), pp 1128–1135, December 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2010.5717891

  21. Witte KA, Fatschel AM, Collins SH (2017) Design of a lightweight, tethered, torque-controlled knee exoskeleton. In: 2017 international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), pp 1646–1653, July 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009484

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is funded by Universidad Militar Nueva Granada- Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones, under research grant for project IMP-ING-2291, entitled ’Diseño de un prototipo para rehabilitación de rodilla mediante el uso de actuadores flexibles’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Velasco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Solaque, L., Valbuena, Y., Romero, M., Velasco, A. (2020). Combined Feedback-Feed Forward Control Strategy for a Knee Rehabilitation Device with Soft Actuation. In: Gusikhin, O., Madani, K. (eds) Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics. ICINCO 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 613. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31993-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics