Skip to main content

Multiple Uses for Procedural Simulators in Continuing Medical Education Contexts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (ICQE 2019)

Abstract

Simulators have been widely adopted to help surgical trainees learn procedural rules and acquire basic psychomotor skills, and research indicates that this learning transfers to clinical practice. However, few studies have explored the use of simulators to help more advanced learners improve their understanding of operative practices. To model how surgeons with different levels of experience use procedural simulators, we conducted a quantitative ethnographic analysis of small-group conversations in a continuing medical education short course on laparoscopic hernia repair. Our research shows that surgeons who had less experience with laparoscopic surgery tended to use the simulators to learn and rehearse the basic procedures, while more experienced surgeons used the simulators as a platform for exploring a range of hernia presentations and operative approaches based on their experiences. Thus simple, inexpensive simulators may be effective with both novice and more experienced learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dawe, S.R., Windsor, J.A., Broeders, J.A., Cregan, P.C., Hewett, P.J., Maddern, G.J.: A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after simulation-based training: laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy. Ann. Surg. 259, 236–248 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Madani, A., et al.: What are the principles that guide behaviors in the operating room? creating a framework to define and measure performance. Ann. Surg. 265, 255–267 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sullivan, S.A., Ruis, A.R., Pugh, C.M.: Procedural simulations and reflective practice: meeting the need. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 27, 455–458 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mattar, S.G., et al.: General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann. Surg. 258, 440–449 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Subhas, G., Mittal, V.K.: Minimally invasive training during surgical residency. Am. Surg. 77, 902–906 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Osman, H., Parikh, J., Patel, S., Jeyarajah, D.R.: Are general surgery residents adequately prepared for hepatopancreatobiliary fellowships? a questionnaire-based study. HPB 17, 265–271 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, R.H.: Operative experience of residents in us general surgery programs: a gap between expectation and experience. Ann. Surg. 249, 719–724 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iyasere, C.A., Baggett, M., Romano, J., Jena, A., Mills, G., Hunt, D.P.: Beyond continuing medical education: clinical coaching as a tool for ongoing professional development. Acad. Med. 91, 1647–1650 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sachdeva, A.K.: The new paradigm of continuing education in surgery. Arch. Surg. 140, 264–269 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pugh, C., Plachta, S., Auyang, E., Pryor, A., Hungness, E.: Outcome measures for surgical simulators: Is the focus on technical skills the best approach? Surgery 147, 646–654 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eagan, B.R., Rogers, B., Pozen, R., Marquart, C., Shaffer, D.W.: rhoR: Rho for inter rater reliability (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marquart, C., Hinojosa, C.L., Swiecki, Z., Eagan, B.R., Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic network analysis (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.R.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Anal. 3, 9–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaffer, D.W., Ruis, A.R.: Epistemic network analysis: a worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In: Lang, C., Siemens, G., Wise, A.F., and Gasevic, D. (eds.) Handbook of Learning Analytics, pp. 175–187. Society for Learning Analytics Research (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., Irgens, G.A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Shaffer, D.W.: In search of conversational grain size: modelling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Anal. 4, 123–139 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  19. McGlinn, E.P., Chung, K.C.: A pause for reflection: Incorporating reflection into surgical training. Ann. Plast. Surg. 73, 117 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jordan, M.E., McDaniel Jr., R.R.: Managing uncertainty during collaborative problem solving in elementary school teams: the role of peer influence in robotics engineering activity. J. Learn. Sci. 23, 490–536 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Husebø, S.E., O’Regan, S., Nestel, D.: Reflective practice and its role in simulation. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 11, 368–375 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mamede, S., Schmidt, H.G.: Correlates of reflective practice in medicine. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 10, 327–337 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McGaghie, W.C., Issenberg, S.B., Cohen, M.E.R., Barsuk, J.H., Wayne, D.B.: Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? a meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad. Med. 86, 706–711 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Davis, D., O’Brien, M.A.T., Freemantle, N., Wolf, F.M., Mazmanian, P., Taylor-Vaisey, A.: Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? J. Am. Med. Assoc. 282, 867–874 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sachdeva, A.K., Blair, P.G., Lupi, L.K.: Education and training to address specific needs during the career progression of surgeons. Surg. Clin. North Am. 96, 115–128 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruis, A.R., Rosser, A.A., Quandt-Walle, C., Nathwani, J.N., Shaffer, D.W., Pugh, C.M.: The hands and head of a surgeon: modeling operative competency with multimodal epistemic network analysis. Am. J. Surg. 216, 835–840 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Godfrey, M., Rosser, A.A., Pugh, C.M., Shaffer, D.W., Sachdeva, A.K., Jung, S.A.: Teaching practicing surgeons what not to do: an analysis of instruction fluidity during a simulation-based continuing medical education course. Surgery 165, 1082–1087 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation (DRL-1661036, DRL-1713110), the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, and the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. A. R. Ruis was supported by a University of Wisconsin-American College of Surgeons Education Research Fellowship. The opinions, findings, and conclusions do not reflect the views of the funding agencies, cooperating institutions, or other individuals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew R. Ruis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ruis, A.R., Rosser, A.A., Nathwani, J.N., Beems, M.V., Jung, S.A., Pugh, C.M. (2019). Multiple Uses for Procedural Simulators in Continuing Medical Education Contexts. In: Eagan, B., Misfeldt, M., Siebert-Evenstone, A. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33231-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33232-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics