Skip to main content

Scenario-Based Prediction of Business Processes Using System Dynamics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences (OTM 2019)

Abstract

Many organizations employ an information system that supports the execution of their business processes. During the execution of these processes, event data are stored in the databases that support the information system. The field of process mining aims to transform such data into actionable insights, which allow business owners to improve their daily operations. For example, a process model describing the actual execution of the process can be easily extracted from the captured event data. Most process mining techniques are “backward-looking” providing compliance and performance information. Few process mining techniques are “forward-looking”. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a novel scenario-based predictive approach that allows us to assess and predict future behavior in business processes. In particular, we propose to use system dynamics to allow for “what-if” questions. We create a system dynamics model using variables trained on the basis of the past behavior of the process, as captured in the event log. This model is used to explore the effect of possibly applied changes in the process as well as roles of external factors, e.g., human behavior. Using real event data, we demonstrate the feasibility of our approach to predict possible consequences of future decisions and policies .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business process simulation survival guide. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1. IHIS, pp. 337–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining - Data Science in Action. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Augusto, A., Conforti, R., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Bruno, G.: Automated discovery of structured process models from event logs: the discover-and-structure approach. Data Knowl. Eng. 117, 373–392 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carmona, J., van Dongen, B.F., Solti, A., Weidlich, M.: Conformance Checking - Relating Processes and Models. Springer, Switzerland (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99414-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. van Der Aalst, W.M.P., Dustdar, S.: Process mining put into context. IEEE Internet Comput. 16(1), 82–86 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Dongen, B.F., Crooy, R.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Cycle time prediction: when will this case finally be finished? In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5331, pp. 319–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88871-0_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Duggan, J.: A comparison of Petri net and system dynamics approaches for modelling dynamic feedback systems. In: 24th International Conference of the Systems Dynamics Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leemans, S.J.J., Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process and deviation exploration with inductive visual miner. In: Proceedings of the BPM Demo Sessions 2014 Co-located with the 12th International Conference on Business Process Management, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 10 September 2014, p. 46 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., Reijers, H.A.: The multi-perspective process explorer. In: Proceedings of the BPM Demo Session 2015 Co-located with the 13th International Conference on Business Process Management, pp. 130–134 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pruyt, E.: Small System Dynamics Models for Big Issues: Triple Jump Towards Real-world Complexity (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Razali, N.M., Wah, Y.B., et al.: Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, solmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. J. Stat. Model. Anal. 2(1), 21–33 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenberg, Z., Riasanow, T., Krcmar, H.: A system dynamics model for business process change projects. In: International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, pp. 1–27 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rozinat, A., Mans, R.S., Song, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering colored Petri nets from event logs. STTT 10(1), 57–74 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rozinat, A., Mans, R.S., Song, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Discovering simulation models. Inf. Syst. 34(3), 305–327 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rozinat, A., Wynn, M.T., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Fidge, C.J.: Workflow simulation for operational decision support. Data Knowl. Eng. 68(9), 834–850 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sterman, J.D.: Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. No. HD30. 2 S7835 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Suriadi, S., Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Event interval analysis: why do processes take time? Decis. Support Syst. 79, 77–98 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tax, N., Teinemaa, I., van Zelst, S.J.: An interdisciplinary comparison of sequence modeling methods for next-element prediction. CoRR abs/1811.00062 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00062

  19. Tax, N., Verenich, I., La Rosa, M., Dumas, M.: Predictive business process monitoring with LSTM neural networks. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 477–492. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Teinemaa, I., Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Maggi, F.M.: Outcome-oriented predictive process monitoring: review and benchmark. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 13(2), 171–1757 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3301300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Dongen, B.F. (Boudewijn): BPI challenge 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4121/UUID:5F3067DF-F10B-45DA-B98B-86AE4C7A310B

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is partially funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft –DFG) in the context of the Cluster of Excellence Internet of Production (EXC 2023, 390621612).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahsa Pourbafrani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pourbafrani, M., van Zelst, S.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2019). Scenario-Based Prediction of Business Processes Using System Dynamics. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Hepp, M., Lewis, D., Ardagna, C., Meersman, R. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences. OTM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33245-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33246-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics