Skip to main content

Time-Frequency Causal Inference Uncovers Anomalous Events in Environmental Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Recognition (DAGM GCPR 2019)

Abstract

Causal inference in dynamical systems is a challenge for different research areas. So far it is mostly about understanding to what extent the underlying causal mechanisms can be derived from observed time series. Here we investigate whether anomalous events can also be identified based on the observed changes in causal relationships. We use a parametric time-frequency representation of vector autoregressive Granger causality for causal inference. The use of time-frequency approach allows for dealing with the nonstationarity of the time series as well as for defining the time scale on which changes occur. We present two representative examples in environmental systems: land-atmosphere ecosystem and marine climate. We show that an anomalous event can be identified as the event where the causal intensities differ according to a distance measure from the average causal intensities. The driver of the anomalous event can then be identified based on the analysis of changes in the causal effect relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barnett, L., Seth, A.K.: The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference. J. Neurosci. Methods 223, 50–68 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wan, E.A., Nelson, A.T.: Dual Extended Kalman Filter Methods, pp. 123–173. Wiley-Blackwell (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/0471221546.ch5. Chapter 5

  3. Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19(6), 716–723 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, T.: The Statistical Analysis of Time Series. Wiley Classics Library. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., Triacca, U.: Granger causality analyses for climatic attribution. Atmos. Clim. Sci. 3(4), 515–522 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2013.34054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baccalá, L.A., Sameshima, K., Takahashi, D.: Generalized partial directed coherence. In: 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing, pp. 163–166. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barnett, L., Seth, A.K.: Behaviour of Granger causality under filtering: theoretical invariance and practical application. J. Neurosci. Methods 201(2), 404–419 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barz, B., Guanche, Y., Rodner, E., Denzler, J.: Maximally divergent intervals for extreme weather event detection. In: MTS/IEEE OCEANS Conference Aberdeen, pp. 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSE.2017.8084569

  9. Eichler, M.: Graphical modelling of multivariate time series. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 153(1), 233–268 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-011-0345-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Faes, L., Porta, A., Nollo, G.: Testing frequency-domain causality in multivariate time series. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57(8), 1897–1906 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Faghmous, J.H., Kumar, V.: A big data guide to understanding climate change: the case for theory-guided data science. Big Data 2(3), 155–163 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feldhoff, J., Donner, R.V., Donges, J.F., Marwan, N., Kurths, J.: Detection of coupling directions by means of inter-system recurrence networks. Phys. Lett. A 376, 3504–3513 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frank, P.: Analytical and qualitative model-based fault diagnosis - a survey and some new results. Eur. J. Control 2(1), 6–28 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0947-3580(96)70024-9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Geweke, J.: Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77(378), 304–313 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Granger, C.W.J.: Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3), 424–438 (1969). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1912791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Granger, C.W.: Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica J. Econometric Soc. 37, 424–438 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haykin, S.: Adaptive Filter Theory, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahecha, M.D., et al.: Detecting impacts of extreme events with ecological in situ monitoring networks. Biogeosciences 14(18), 4255–4277 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-4255-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marinazzo, D., Liao, W., Chen, H., Stramaglia, S.: Nonlinear connectivity by Granger causality. NeuroImage 58(2), 330–338 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Papagiannopoulou, C., et al.: A non-linear Granger-causality framework to investigate climate-vegetation dynamics. Geoscientific Model Dev. 10(5), 1945–1960 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1945-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Peters, J., Janzing, D., Schölkopf, B.: Elements of Causal Inference - Foundations and Learning Algorithms. Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning Series. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Rambal, S., Joffre, R., Ourcival, J.M., Cavender-Bares, J., Rocheteau, A.: The growth respiration component in Eddy CO\(_2\) flux from a quercus ilex mediterranean forest. Glob. Change Biol. 10(9), 1460–1469 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00819.x

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., Prabhat: Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven earth system science. Nature 195–204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1

  24. Schwarz, G.: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6(2), 461–464 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Seth, A.K., Barrett, A.B., Barnett, L.: Granger causality analysis in neuroscience and neuroimaging. J. Neurosci. 35(8), 3293–3297 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4399-14.2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shadaydeh, M., Garcia, Y.G., Mahecha, M., Reichstein, M., Denzler, J.: Causality analysis of ecological time series: a time-frequency approach. In: Chen, C., Cooley, D., Runge, J., Szekely, E. (eds.) Climate Informatics Workshop 2018, pp. 111–114 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Solo, V.: State-space analysis of Granger-Geweke causality measures with application to fMRI. Neural Comput. 28(5), 914–949 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_00828. pMID: 26942749

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Takahashi, D.Y., Baccal, L.A., Sameshima, K.: Connectivity inference between neural structures via partial directed coherence. J. Appl. Stat. 34(10), 1259–1273 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760701593065

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Theiler, J., Eubank, S., Longtin, A., Galdrikian, B., Farmer, J.D.: Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58(1), 77–94 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Trifunov, V.T., Shadaydeh, M., Runge, J., Eyring, V., Reichstein, M., Denzler, J.: Nonlinear causal link estimation under hidden confounding with an application to time series anomaly detection. In: German Conference on Pattern Recognition (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhong, M., Xue, T., Ding, S.X.: A survey on model-based fault diagnosis for linear discrete time-varying systems. Neurocomputing 306, 51–60 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.04.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Carl Zeiss Foundation for the financial support within the scope of the program line “Breakthroughs: Exploring Intelligent Systems” for “Digitization—explore the basics, use applications”. This work used eddy covariance data acquired and shared by the FLUXNET community.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maha Shadaydeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shadaydeh, M., Denzler, J., GarcĂ­a, Y.G., Mahecha, M. (2019). Time-Frequency Causal Inference Uncovers Anomalous Events in Environmental Systems. In: Fink, G., Frintrop, S., Jiang, X. (eds) Pattern Recognition. DAGM GCPR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33676-9_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33676-9_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33675-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33676-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics