Skip to main content

Operating Enterprise AI as a Service

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC 2019)

Abstract

This paper discusses the challenges in providing AI functionality “as a Service” (AIaaS) in enterprise contexts, and proposes solutions to some of these challenges. The solutions are based on our experience in designing, deploying, and testing AI services with a number of customers of ServiceNow, an Application Platform as a Service that enables digital workflows and simplifies the complexity of work in a single cloud platform. Some of the underlying ideas were developed when many of the authors were part of DxContinuum inc, a machine learning (ML) startup that ServiceNow bought in 2017 with the express purpose of embedding ML in the ServiceNow platform. The widespread adoption of ServiceNow by the majority of large corporations has given us the opportunity to interact with customers in different markets and to appreciate the needs, fears and barriers towards adopting AIaaS and to design solutions that respond to such barriers. In this paper we share the lessons we learned from these interactions and present the resulting framework and architecture we adopted, which aims at addressing fundamental concerns that are sometimes conflicting with each other, from automation to security, performance, effectiveness, ease of adoption, and efficient use of resources. Finally, we discuss the research challenges that lie ahead in this space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper, we use the machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) somewhat interchangeably because the distinction is not significant for the purposes of this paper.

  2. 2.

    See, e.g., https://emerj.com/ai-executive-guides/enterprise-adoption-of-artificial-intelligence/.

  3. 3.

    The survey was run across regions and industries in the US, reaching over 2000 companies.

  4. 4.

    See for example https://docs.uipath.com/orchestrator/docs/about-physical-deployment for RPA architectures on UIPath.

  5. 5.

    https://developer.servicenow.com.

  6. 6.

    ServiceNow releases are named from cities around the world.

References

  1. Amatriain, X., Basilico, J.: Netflix recommendations: Beyond the 5 stars. https://medium.com/netflix-techblog/netflix-recommendations-beyond-the-5-stars-part-1-55838468f429a (2012)

  2. Augusto, A., et al.: Automated discovery of process models from event logs: review and benchmark. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. PP, May 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2841877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouguettaya, A., et al.: A service computing manifesto: the next 10 years. Commun. ACM 60, 64–72 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/2983528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunet, M., Alkalay-Houlihan, C., Anderson, A., Zemel, R.S.: Understanding the origins of bias in word embeddings. CoRR abs/1810.03611 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03611

  5. Di Francescomarino, C., Ghidini, C., Maggi, F., Milani, F.: Predictive process monitoring methods: which one suits me best?, April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geyer-Klingeberg, J., Nakladal, J., Baldauf, F., Veit, F.: Process mining and robotic process automation: a perfect match, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grigori, D., Casati, F., Castellanos, M., Dayal, U., Sayal, M., Shan, M.C.: Business process intelligence. Comput. Ind. 53(3), 321–343 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2003.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanzlik, L., et al.: MLCapsule: guarded offline deployment of machine learning as a service. Technical report, September 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00590

  9. Li, T., Zhong, J., Liu, J., Wu, W., Zhang, C.: Ease.ml: Towards multi-tenant resource sharing for machine learning workloads, September 2017

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mistry, S., Bouguettaya, A., Dong, H.: Economic Models for Managing Cloud Services. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73876-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Osman, C., Ghiran, A.M.: Extracting customer traces from CRMS: from software to process models. Procedia Manufact. 32, 619–626 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ribeiro, M., Grolinger, K., Capretz, M.: MLaaS: machine learning as a service, December 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2015.152

  13. Sampson, A., Panchekha, P., Mytkowicz, T., McKinley, K.S., Grossman, D., Ceze, L.: Expressing and verifying probabilistic assertions. In: Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), June 2014. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/expressing-and-verifying-probabilistic-assertions/

  14. Sculley, D., et al.: Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. In: Cortes, C., Lawrence, N.D., Lee, D.D., Sugiyama, M., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 28, pp. 2503–2511. Curran Associates, Inc. (2015). http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5656-hidden-technical-debt-in-machine-learning-systems.pdf

  15. Seeliger, A., Nolle, T., Mühlhäuser, M.: Finding structure in the unstructured: hybrid feature set clustering for process discovery. In: Weske, M., Montali, M., Weber, I., vom Brocke, J. (eds.) BPM 2018. LNCS, vol. 11080, pp. 288–304. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98648-7_17

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Seeliger, A., Sánchez Guinea, A., Nolle, T., Mühlhäuser, M.: ProcessExplorer: intelligent process mining guidance. In: Hildebrandt, T., van Dongen, B., Röglinger, M., Mendling, J. (eds.) BPM 2019. LNCS, vol. 11675. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, W., et al.: Rafiki: machine learning as an analytics service system. Proc. VLDB Endowm. 12, 128–140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14778/3282495.3282499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Webb, N.: Notes from the AI frontier: AI adoption advances, but foundational barriers remain (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, S., Li, J., Tang, X., Chen, S., Marsic, I., Burd, R.: Process mining for trauma resuscitation, vol. 18, August 2017

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Casati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Casati, F. et al. (2019). Operating Enterprise AI as a Service. In: Yangui, S., Bouassida Rodriguez, I., Drira, K., Tari, Z. (eds) Service-Oriented Computing. ICSOC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33702-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33702-5_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33701-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33702-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics