Abstract
Motivation behind electronic government (eGovernment) is generally creating of a better society. However, many eGovernment projects have failed due to the complex nature of these ecosystems. In the future eGovernment are starting to form larger data ecosystems due to initiatives such the European Single Market. The current trend of moving from national initiatives to international cooperation will make these projects even more complicated and thus, even more vulnerable to failures. Multiple large groups of stakeholders should be considered in the governance of these ecosystems, but there are little effective ways for that. It has been argued that values play an integral role in the success of eGovernment. Thus, in this paper we present a constructive analysis of values in eGovernment that aims to clarify the complexity around the matter. First, different levels and types of values affecting eGovernment are considered and then existing values guiding the governance of eGovernment are analysed. Based on these preliminary analyses it is noted, that there are some justified values, but more work is needed to create ethical governance model for eGovernment and data ecosystems that they are a part of to avoid failures and perhaps reach the goal of better society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Digital single market. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/. Accessed 08 Aug 2019
Al-Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M.M., Chatfield, A., Migdadi, M.: The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 53, 189–203 (2015)
Aristotle: The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009). translated and edited by Ross, W. D., and Brown, L
Bentham, J.: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Batoche, Kitchener (1781)
Brey, P.: The strategic role of technology in a good society. Technology in Society (2017). advance online publication
Collins, J.C., Porras, J.I.: Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. Harper Business, New York (1994)
Collins, J.C., Porras, J.I.: Building your company’s vision. Harv. Bus. Rev September-October 1996, 65–77 (1996)
Edwards, J.R., Cable, D.M.: The value of value congruence. J. Appl. Psychol. 94, 654–677 (2009)
Feldman, F.: Introductory Ethics. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River (1978)
Frankena, W.K.: Ethics, 2nd edn. N.H J. Prentice Hall, Englewood (1973)
Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A., Huldtgren, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Doorn, N., Schuurbiers, D., van de Poel, I., Gorman, M.E. (eds.) Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory. PET, vol. 16, pp. 55–95. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4
Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H.J., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. Technical Report, 02–12-01, UW CSE Technical Report, The address of the publisher (2001)
Helkama, K., Myllyniemi, R., Liebkind, K.: Johdatus Sosiaalipsykologiaan. Edita Prima Oy, Helsinki (2010)
Hofstede, G.: Dimensionalizing cultures: the hofstede model in context. ORPC 2, 8 (2011)
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival, 3rd edn. London McGraw-Hill, New York (2010)
Kant, I.: Grundlegung zur Metaphysic der Sitten [main translation: Liddel B. Kant on the foundation of morality - a modern version of the Grundlegung]. Indiana University Press, Indiana (1785/1970)
Kolkowska, E., Karlsson, F., Hedström, K.: Towards analysing the rationale of information security non-compliance: devising a value-based compliance analysis method. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 26, 39–57 (2017)
Koskinen, J.S., Heimo, O.I., Kimppa, K.K.: A viewpoint for more ethical approach in healthcare information system development and procurement: the four principles. In: Exploring the Abyss of Inequalities: 4th International Conference on Well-Being in the Information Society, WIS (2012)
Koskinen, J., Kimppa, K.K.: An unclear question: who owns patient information? In: Kreps, D., Fletcher, G., Griffiths, M. (eds.) HCC 2016. IAICT, vol. 474, pp. 3–13. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44805-3_1
Lencioni, P.: Make your values mean something. Harv. Bus. Rev. 80(7), 113–117 (2002)
Mill, J.S.: Utilitarianism. Green and Company, Longmans (1895)
Mumford, E.: The story of socio-technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Inf. Syst. J. 16, 317–342 (2006)
Nissenbaum, H.: Computing and accountability. Commun. ACM 37, 72–80 (1994)
Panagiotopoulos, P., Al-Debei, M.M., Fitzgerald, G., Elliman, T.: A business model perspective for icts in public engagement. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 192–202 (2012)
Plato: Valtio [org. The Republic], 3rd edn. Otava, Keuruu (2012)
Rokeach, M.: The Nature of Human Values. Free Press, New York (1973)
Rose, J., Flak, L.S., Sæ bØ, O.: Stakeholder theory for the e-government context: framing a value-oriented normative core. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, 362–374 (2018)
Rose, J., Persson, J.S., Heeager, L.T., Irani, Z.: Managing e-government: value positions and relationships. Inf. Syst. J. 25, 531–571 (2015)
Schwartz, S.H.: Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries, vol. 25, 3 edn., pp. 1–65. Academic Press, New York (1992)
Schwartz, S.H.: An overview of the schwartz theory of basic values. Gov. Inf. Quart. 2, 362–374 (2012)
Scott, M., DeLone, W., Golden, W.: Measuring egovernment success: a public value approach. Eur. J. Inf. Syst 25, 187–208 (2015)
Stahl, B.C.: Morality, ethics, and reflection: a categorization of normative is research. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 636–656 (2012)
Stahl, B.C., Eden, G., Jirotka, M., Coeckelbergh, M.: From computer ethics to responsible research and innovation in ICT: the transition of reference discourses informing ethics-related research in information systems. Inf. Manag. 51, 810–818 (2014)
Sullivan, W., Sullivan, R., Buffton, B.: Aligning individual and organisational values to support change. J. Change Manag. 2, 247–254 (2001)
Talbot, C.: Measuring Public Value - A Competing Values Approach. The Work Foundation, London (2008)
Tavani, H.T.: Ethics & Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of Information and Communication Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2007)
The European Commission: The European eGovernment Action Plan 2011–2015 - Harnessing ICT to promote smart, sustainable & innovative Government. Brussels: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Commission (2010)
The European Commission: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016–2020, Accelerating the digital transformation of government, Brussels. The European Commission (2016)
The European Commission: eGovernment Benchmark 2017 - Taking stock of user-centric design and delivery of digital public services in Europe. Final Background Report - volume 2, A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Net-works, Content & Technology. The European Commission (2016)
The European Commission: Report on the public consultation and other consultation activities of the European Commission for the preparation of the EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016–2020. Public services. The European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (2016)
The European Commission: eGovernment Benchmark 2017, Taking stock of user-centric design and delivery of digital public services in Europe, Final Insight Report - Volume 1, A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology. The European Commission (2018)
Van Der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., Lasthuizen, K.: What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Adm. 86, 465–482 (2008)
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Chan, F.K.Y., Hu, P.J.H.: Managing citizens’ uncertainty in egovernment services: the mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Inf. Syst. Res 27, 87–111 (2015)
Wiesing, U.: Immanuel kant, his philosophy and medicine. Med. Health Care Philos. 11(2), 221–236 (2008)
Yli-Huumo, J., Päivärinta, T., Rinne, J., Smolander, K.: Suomi.fi – towards government 3.0 with a national service platform. In: Parycek, P., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2018. LNCS, vol. 11020, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_1
Zhou, Z., Jin, X.L., Fang, Y., Vogel, D.: Toward a theory of perceived benefits, affective commitment, and continuance intention in social virtual worlds: cultural values (indulgence and individualism) matter. Eur. J. Inf. Syst 24, 247–261 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rantanen, M.M., Koskinen, J. (2019). Towards a Better Society. In: Hyrynsalmi, S., Suoranta, M., Nguyen-Duc, A., Tyrväinen, P., Abrahamsson, P. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 370. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33742-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33742-1_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33741-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33742-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)