Abstract
A number of studies report about students’ difficulties with basic flow-control constructs, and specifically with iteration. Although such issues are less explored in the context of pre-tertiary education, this seems to be especially the case for high-school programming learning, where the difficulties concern both the “mechanical” features of the notional machine as well as the logical aspects connected with the constructs, ranging from the implications of loop conditions to a more abstract grasp of the underlying algorithms.
As part of a project whose long-run goal is identifying methodological tools to improve the learning of iteration constructs, we interviewed 20 experienced upper secondary teachers of introductory programming in different kinds of schools from a large area in the North-East of Italy. In addition, a sample of 164 students from the same schools answered a survey which included both questions on their subjective perception of difficulty and simple tasks probing their understanding of iteration.
The interviews were mainly aimed at ascertaining teachers’ beliefs about major sources of issues for basic programming concepts and their approach to the teaching and learning of iteration constructs. Each interview was conducted according to a grid of 20 questions, informed by related frameworks to characterize teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and to design concept inventories. In essence, data from teachers and students confirm that iteration is a central programming concept and indicate that the treatment of conditions and nested constructs are major sources of students’ difficulties with iteration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Complete English versions of the interview questions and of the student survey are available online at: nid.dimi.uniud.it/additional_material/iteration_project.html.
- 2.
Text comprehension is an issue for 42% of the teachers and 27% of the students.
References
Astrachan, O.: Pictures as invariants. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-second SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 112–118. SIGCSE 1991, ACM, New York (1991). https://doi.org/10.1145/107004.107026
Barendsen, E., et al.: Concepts in k-9 computer science education. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports, pp. 85–116. ITICSE-WGR 2015, ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858796.2858800
Buchholz, M., Saeli, M., Schulte, C.: Pck and reflection in computer science teacher education. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 11 2013. https://doi.org/10.1145/2532748.2532752
Caceffo, R., Wolfman, S., Booth, K.S., Azevedo, R.: Developing a computer science concept inventory for introductory programming. In: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, SIGCSE 2016, pp. 364–369. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844559
Cherenkova, Y., Zingaro, D., Petersen, A.: Identifying challenging cs1 concepts in a large problem dataset. In: Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2014, pp. 695–700. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538966
Fernández Alemán, J.L., Oufaska, Y.: Samtool, a tool for deducing and implementing loop patterns. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2010, pp. 68–72. ACM, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822111
Ginat, D.: Seeking or skipping regularities? Novice tendencies and the role of invariants. Inf. Educ. 2, 211–222 (2003)
Goldman, K., et al.: Setting the scope of concept inventories for introductory computing subjects. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 10(2), 5 (2010)
Gomes, A., Mendes, A.: Learning to program - difficulties and solutions. In: International Conference on Engineering Education - ICEE, pp. 283–287, 01 2007
Jenkins, T.: On the difficulty of learning to program. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual LTSN ICS Conference (2002). http://www.ics.ltsn.ac.uk/pub/conf2002/tjenkins.pdf
Kaczmarczyk, L.C., Petrick, E.R., East, J.P., Herman, G.L.: Identifying student misconceptions of programming. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2010, pp. 107–111. ACM, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734299
Lewandowski, G., Gutschow, A., Mccartney, R., Sanders, K., Shinners-Kennedy, D.: What novice programmers don’t know. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER 2005, pp. 1–12. ACM (2005)
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., Berry, A.: Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. Int. J. Sci. Educ. - INT J SCI EDUC 30, 1301–1320 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187009
Luxton-Reilly, A., et al.: Developing assessments to determine mastery of programming fundamentals. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports, ITiCSE-WGR ’17, pp. 47–69. ACM, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3174781.3174784
Luxton-Reilly, A., et al.: Introductory programming: a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2018 Companion, pp. 55–106. ACM, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3293881.3295779
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., Borko, H.: Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In: Gess-Newsome, J., Lederman, N. (eds.) Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Science & Technology Education Library, vol. 6, pp. 95–132. Springer, Dordrecht (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4
Mirolo, C.: Is iteration really easier to learn than recursion for cs1 students? In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER 2012, pp. 99–104. ACM, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2361276.2361296
Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Jochems, W., Zwaneveld, B.: Teaching programming in secondary school: a pedagogical content knowledge perspective. Inf. Educ. 10, 73–88 (2011)
Schaffer, D.: An analysis of science concept inventories and diagnostic tests: commonalities and differences. In: Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (2012)
Shulman, L.S.: Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ. Res. 15(2), 4–14 (1986)
Tam, W.C.: Teaching loop invariants to beginners by examples. SIGCSE Bull. 24(1), 92–96 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1145/135250.134530
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Scapin, E., Mirolo, C. (2019). An Exploration of Teachers’ Perspective About the Learning of Iteration-Control Constructs. In: Pozdniakov, S., Dagienė, V. (eds) Informatics in Schools. New Ideas in School Informatics. ISSEP 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11913. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33759-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33759-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33758-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33759-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)