Skip to main content

PrivaCity

A Chatbot Game to Raise Privacy Awareness Among Teenagers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Informatics in Schools. New Ideas in School Informatics (ISSEP 2019)

Abstract

Privacy is a well-known concern connected to teenagers’ use of e.g., social media, mobile apps, and wearables. An increasing number of schools are looking for ways to integrate this topic in their activities, as part of informatics subjects or integrated in other subjects as part of basic digital competences. This paper explores how chatbot serious games, i.e. games that evolves as a conversation between a player and a software agent, can be used as a tool to raise privacy awareness. We present PrivaCity, a chatbot game to raise privacy awareness in smart cities. Focus on smart cities is motivated by a predominant focus in existing games on what to share and not to share on social networks. Little is done to learn about the risks of the digital footprints, when data is collected about the citizens across a multitude of devices, digital services, and ubiquitous digital sensors. The paper presents the game design, implementation, and evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://teachingprivacy.org/.

  2. 2.

    For more information on Microsoft Bot Framework see https://dev.botframework.com/ and for Microsoft LUIS https://www.luis.ai/home.

References

  1. Acquisti, A., et al.: Nudges for privacy and security. ACM Comput. Survey 50(3), 1–41 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barab, S.A., Gresalfi, M., Ingram-Goble, A.: Transformational play: using games to position person, content, and context. Educ. Res. 39(7), 525–536 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergen, E., Solberg, D.F., Sæthre, T.H., Divitini, M.: Supporting the co-design of games for privacy awareness. In: Auer, M.E., Tsiatsos, T. (eds.) ICL 2018. AISC, vol. 916, pp. 888–899. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Blythe, J.M., Coventry, L.: Cyber security games: a new line of risk. In: Herrlich, M., Malaka, R., Masuch, M. (eds.) ICEC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7522, pp. 600–603. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33542-6_80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cetto, A., Netter, M., Pernul, G., Richthammer, C., Riesner, M., Roth, C., Sänger, J.: Friend Inspector: A Serious Game to Enhance Privacy Awareness in Social Networks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, J.: Flow in games (and everything else). Commun. ACM 50(4), 31–34 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cherry, K.: Extrinsic vs. Intrinsic Motivation: What’s the Difference? Very well Mind (2019). https://www.verywellmind.com/differences-between-extrinsic-and-intrinsic-motivation-2795384. Accessed Aug 2019

  8. Connolly, T.M., et al.: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 661–686 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crabtree, A., Tolmie, P., Knight, W.: Repacking ‘Privacy’ for a networked world. Comput. Support. Coop. Work. (CSCW) 26(4-6), 453–488 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dickey, M.D.: Murder on Grimm Isle: the impact of game narrative design in an educational game-based learning environment. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 42(3), 456–469 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fadhil, A., Villafiorita, A.: An adaptive learning with gamification & conversational UIs: the rise of CiboPoliBot. In: Adjunct Publication of UMAP 2017, pp. 408–412. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Interland - Be Internet Awesome. https://beinternetawesome.withgoogle.com/. Accessed Aug 2019

  13. Jeuring, J., et al.: Communicate! — a serious game for communication skills —. In: Conole, G., Klobučar, T., Rensing, C., Konert, J., Lavoué, É. (eds.) EC-TEL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9307, pp. 513–517. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Laufer, R.S., Wolfe, M.: Privacy as a concept and a social issue: a multidimensional developmental theory. J. Soc. Issues 33(3), 22–42 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lebeuf, C., Storey, M.A., Zagalsky, A.: Software bots. IEEE Soft. 35(1), 18–23 (2018). ISSN: 0740-7459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McLaren, D., Agyeman, J.: Sharing Cities: A Case for Truly Smart and Sustainable Cities. Urban and Industrial Environments. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neto, J.N., et al.: Solis’Curse - a cultural heritage game using voice interaction with a virtual agent. In: 2011 Third International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, pp. 164–167 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nissenbaum, H.: Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Othlinghaus, J., Hoppe, H.U.: Supporting group reflection in a virtual role-playing environment. In: Poppe, R., Meyer, J.-J., Veltkamp, R., Dastani, M. (eds.) INTETAIN 2016 2016. LNICST, vol. 178, pp. 292–298. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49616-0_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Ravyse, W.S., et al.: Success factors for serious games to enhance learning: a systematic review. Virtual Real. 21(1), 31–58 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rollings, A., Adams, E.: Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on Game Design. NRG Series. New Riders, ‎Indianapolis (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stobert, E., et al.: Teaching authentication as a life skill. IEEE Secur. Priv. 16(5), 82–85 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.3761712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., Valcke, M.: Educating Teens about the risks on social network sites. Huelva 22(43), 123–131 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Westin, A.F.: Privacy and freedom. Wash. Lee Law Rev. 25(1), 166 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Zoonen, L.: Privacy concerns in smart cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(3), 472–480 (2016). Open and Smart Governments: Strategies, Tools, and Experiences

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is co-funded by the NFR IKTPLUSS project ALerT, #270969. We thank the students and teachers who joined the evaluation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Divitini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Berger, E., Sæthre, T.H., Divitini, M. (2019). PrivaCity. In: Pozdniakov, S., Dagienė, V. (eds) Informatics in Schools. New Ideas in School Informatics. ISSEP 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11913. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33759-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33759-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33758-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33759-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics