Abstract
Engineers account for uncertainties by using Design Margins, typically by introducing them implicitly. Although methods for quantifying uncertainty are well established at discipline level, they are not applied systematically. A hierarchy of assumed independent design margins makes it difficult to deduce architect level margins. Further, the implicit application of margins and reserve factors also obfuscates the mutualisation of the margins. Therefore, uncertainty aggregation is difficult, in the quantitative sense, leading to potential over design. Quantifying these uncertainties, making them explicit and aggregating them correctly enable the discovery of appropriate margins to manage the identified risks and opportunities.
We show how uncertainties, arising at different levels in a design process, may be aggregated to provide variations in the performance metrics of a complex system. The approach is illustrated through a case study based on a notional aircraft; the performances metric chosen for this example is the cruise fuel consumption.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A set of FOMs are needed to ensure that all the requirements for the system are met - e.g. a bicycle, car, train, aeroplane require not only the Specific Fuel Consumption, but also the distance to be travelled, the expected speed of travel, the payload to be carried, etc.
- 2.
MoSSEC: Modelling and Simulation information in a collaborative Systems Engineering Context (ISO/CD 10303-243) (https://www.iso.org/standard/72491.html).
References
Yannou, B., Yvars, P.-A., Hoyle, C., Chen, W.: Set-based design by simulation of usage scenario coverage. J. Eng. Des., 33 p. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2013.780201.hal-00801604v2. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00801604v2/document. Accessed 25 July 2019
Guenov, M.D., Nunez, M., Molina-Cristóbal, A., Sripawadkul, V., Datta, V., Riaz, A.: Composition, management, and exploration of computational studies at early design stage. In: Vasile, M., Becerra, V.M. (eds.) Computational Intelligence in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 244. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston (2014)
Guenov, M.D., Nunez, M., Molina-Cristóbal, A., Datta, V., Riaz, A.: AIRCADIA – An Interactive tool for composition and exploration of aircraft computational studies at early design stage. In: Proceedings of the 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), St. Petersburg, Russia, 7–12 September 2014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hall, K., Schroll, P., Sharma, S. (2020). Managing Margins Under Uncertainties Surrogate Modelling and Uncertainty Quantification. In: Boy, G., Guegan, A., Krob, D., Vion, V. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management. CSDM 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34843-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34843-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34842-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34843-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)