Skip to main content

A Customer-Oriented Assortment Selection in the Big Data Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in E-Business Engineering for Ubiquitous Computing (ICEBE 2019)

Abstract

Customers prefer the availability of a range of products when they shop online. This enables them to identify their needs and select products that best match their desires. This is addressed through assortment planning. Some customers have strong awareness of what they want to purchase and from which provider. When considering customer taste as an abstract concept, such customers’ decisions may be influenced by the existence of the variety of products and the current variant market may affect their initial desire. Previous studies dealing with assortment planning have commonly addressed it from the retailer’s point of view. This paper will provide customers with a ranking method to find what they want. We propose that this provision benefits both the retailer and the customer. This study provides a customer-oriented assortment ranking approach. The ranking model facilitates browsing and exploring the current big market in order to help customers find their desired item considering their own taste. In this study, a scalable and customised multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method is structured and utilised to help customers in the process of finding their most suitable assortment while shopping online. The proposed MCDM method is tailored to fit the big data environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saberi, Z., et al.: Stackelberg game-theoretic approach in joint pricing and assortment optimizing for small-scale online retailers: seller-buyer supply chain case. In: 2018 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA). IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saberi, Z., et al.: Online retailer assortment planning and managing under customer and supplier uncertainty effects using internal and external data. In: 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saberi, Z., et al.: Stackelberg model based game theory approach for assortment and selling price planning for small scale online retailers. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 100, 1088–1102 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hart, C., Rafiq, M.: The dimensions of assortment: a proposed hierarchy of assortment decision making. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 16(3), 333–351 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flamand, T., et al.: Integrated assortment planning and store-wide shelf space allocation: an optimization-based approach. Omega 81, 134–149 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kök, A.G., Fisher, M.L., Vaidyanathan, R.: Assortment planning: review of literature and industry practice. In: Retail Supply Chain Management, pp. 175–236. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kunnumkal, S., Martínez-de-Albéniz, V.: Tractable approximations for assortment planning with product costs. Oper. Res. 67, 436–452 (2019)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Flores, A., Berbeglia, G., Van Hentenryck, P.: Assortment optimization under the sequential multinomial logit model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 273(3), 1052–1064 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kautish, P., Sharma, R.: Managing online product assortment and order fulfillment for superior e-tailing service experience: an empirical investigation. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logistics 4, 1161–1192 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Melacini, M., et al.: E-fulfilment and distribution in omni-channel retailing: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manag. 48(4), 391–414 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Argouslidis, P., et al.: Consumers’ reactions to variety reduction in grocery stores: a freedom of choice perspective. Eur. J. Mark. 52(9/10), 1931–1955 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Z., Lu, Q., Talebian, M.: Online versus bricks-and-mortar retailing: a comparison of price, assortment and delivery time. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(13), 3823–3835 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, R., Sahin, O.: The impact of consumer search cost on assortment planning and pricing. Manag. Sci. 64(8), 3649–3666 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sauré, D., Zeevi, A.: Optimal dynamic assortment planning with demand learning. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 15(3), 387–404 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goyal, V., Levi, R., Segev, D.: Near-optimal algorithms for the assortment planning problem under dynamic substitution and stochastic demand. Oper. Res. 64(1), 219–235 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Pan, X.A., Honhon, D.: Assortment planning for vertically differentiated products. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21(2), 253–275 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Azadeh, A., et al.: Z-AHP: A Z-number extension of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. In: 2013 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST). IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shokri, H., et al.: An integrated AHP-VIKOR methodology for Facility Layout design. Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst. 12(4), 389–405 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aboutorab, H., et al.: ZBWM: the Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development. Expert Syst. Appl. 107, 115–125 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nawaz, F., et al.: An MCDM method for cloud service selection using a Markov chain and the best-worst method. Knowl.-Based Syst. 159, 120–131 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, Y., et al.: Ranking scientific articles based on bibliometric networks with a weighting scheme. J. Informetr. 13(2), 616–634 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Asadabadi, M.R., Chang, E., Saberi, M.: Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process (ANP). Cogent Eng. 6, 1623153 (2019). (just-accepted)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rezaei, J.: Piecewise linear value functions for multi-criteria decision-making. Expert Syst. Appl. 98, 43–56 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchell, R.: Web Scraping with Python: Collecting More Data from the Modern Web. O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Saberi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saberi, M., Saberi, Z., Aasadabadi, M.R., Hussain, O.K., Chang, E. (2020). A Customer-Oriented Assortment Selection in the Big Data Environment. In: Chao, KM., Jiang, L., Hussain, O., Ma, SP., Fei, X. (eds) Advances in E-Business Engineering for Ubiquitous Computing. ICEBE 2019. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 41. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34986-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics