Skip to main content

An Equity-Based Incentive Mechanism for Decentralized Virtual World Content Storage

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 41))

Abstract

Virtual worlds have become the arena for many entertainment, social, and business activities and provided a platform for user content generation. To protect user innovation, persistency is an important property. Unfortunately, existing virtual worlds, owned by some entities, are not immune from death due to entity failure. To provide a persistent virtual world, a decentralized architecture is explored, which is constructed on user contributed devices. However, there are many challenges to realize a decentralized virtual world. One important issue is user cooperation in reliable content storage. The devices contributed by users may not be reliable for maintaining all user contents, but users do not have the incentive to provide reliable devices for others. This paper addresses the issue by two steps. First, an indicator is provided to users, called replica group reliability which is based on the proposed replicability index. Based on the indicator, users can learn the reliability of their content storage. Then, a new user incentive mechanism, called equity-based node allocation strategy, is proposed to promote user cooperation to collectively maintain reliable content storage. A decentralized algorithm implementing the strategy is designed and the evaluation results show its effectiveness and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dionisio, J.D.N., Gilbert, R.: 3D virtual worlds and the Metaverse: current status and future possibilities. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 45(3), 34 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tredinnick, L.: Virtual realities in the business world. Bus. Inf. Rev. 35(1), 39–42 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Poppe, E., Brown, R., Recker, J., Johnson, D., Vanderfeesten, I.: Design and evaluation of virtual environments mechanisms to support remote collaboration on complex process diagrams. Inf. Syst. 66, 59–81 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou, M., Leenders, M.A., Cong, L.M.: Ownership in the virtual world and the implications for long-term user innovation success. Technovation (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shen, B., Guo, J., Li, L.X.: Cost optimization in persistent virtual world design. Inf. Technol. Manage. 19(3), 155–169 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lua, E.K., Crowcroft, J., Pias, M., Sharma, R., Lim, S.: A survey and comparison of peer-to-peer overlay network schemes. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 7(1–4), 72–93 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Adams, J.S.: Towards an understanding of inequity. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 67(5), 422 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Austin, W., Walster, E.: Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 30(2), 208 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krishnan, R., Smith, M.D., Telang, R.: The economics of peer-to-peer networks. Available at SSRN 504062 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Adar, E., Huberman, B.A.: Free riding on Gnutella. First Monday 5(10) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hardin, G.: The tragedy of the commons. J. Nat. Resour. Policy Res. 1(3), 243–253 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oualha, N., Roudier, Y.: Peer-to-Peer Storage: Security and Protocols. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, W., Peng, D., Lin, C., Chen, Z., Song, J.: Enhancing tit-for-tat for incentive in BitTorrent networks. Peer-to-peer Network. Appl. 3(1), 27–35 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lillibridge, M., Elnikety, S., Birrell, A., Burrows, M., Isard, M.: A cooperative internet backup scheme. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, p. 3. USENIX Association, June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shen, H., Lin, Y., Li, Z.: Refining reputation to truly select high-QoS servers in peer-to-peer networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24(12), 2439–2450 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oualha, N., Roudier, Y.: Securing P2P storage with a self-organizing payment scheme. In: Data Privacy Management and Autonomous Spontaneous Security, pp. 155–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Vishnumurthy, V., Chandrakumar, S., Sirer, E.G.: Karma: a secure economic framework for peer-to-peer resource sharing. In: Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-peer Systems, vol. 35, no. 6, June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adams, J.S.: Inequity in social exchange. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 267–299. Academic Press (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Messe, L.A., Dawson, J.E., Lane, I.M.: Equity as a mediator of the effect of reward level on behavior in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 26(1), 60 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Radinsky, T.L.: Equity and inequity as a source of reward and punishment. Psychon. Sci. 15(6), 293–295 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wicker, A.W., Bushweiler, G.: Perceived fairness and pleasantness of social exchange situations: two factorial studies of inequity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 15(1), 63 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmitt, D.R., Marwell, G.: Withdrawal and reward reallocation as responses to inequity. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 8(3), 207–221 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Donald, E.K.: The art of computer programming. Sorting Searching 3, 426–458 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Knoll, M., Wacker, A., Schiele, G., Weis, T.: Bootstrapping in peer-to-peer systems. In: 2008 14th IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, pp. 271–278. IEEE, December 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research is partially supported by the University of Macau Research Grant No. MYRG2017-00091-FST.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingzhi Guo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shen, B., Guo, J., Tan, W. (2020). An Equity-Based Incentive Mechanism for Decentralized Virtual World Content Storage. In: Chao, KM., Jiang, L., Hussain, O., Ma, SP., Fei, X. (eds) Advances in E-Business Engineering for Ubiquitous Computing. ICEBE 2019. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 41. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34986-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics