Skip to main content

Challenges in Enterprise and Information Systems Modeling in the Contexts of Socio Cyber Physical Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation (EOMAS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 366))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Nowadays information systems extend beyond the traditional enterprise resource planning systems, which often are regarded as socio-technical systems. With availability of cloud computing, open data, smart devices and smart factories, information systems development requires considering enterprises as socio-cyber-physical systems with emerging relationships to other systems; and handling emerging data available in the cyberspace. Well known frameworks such as ArchiMate enterprise architecture language, Reference Architecture Model Industry 4.0, and Work System framework only partly can cover the needs of socio-cyber-physical systems modeling. There are several challenges in the application of these frameworks in information systems design in the contexts of socio-cyber-physical systems. To meet the identified challenges, some extensions and integration of the frameworks are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Salnitri, M., Paja, E., Giorgini, P.: Preserving compliance with security requirements in socio-technical systems. In: Cleary, F., Felici, M. (eds.) CSP 2014. CCIS, vol. 470, pp. 49–61. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12574-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. ArchiMate® 3.0.1 Specification, an Open Group Standard (2017). http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/. Accessed 17 Mar 2019

  3. Schweichhart, K.: Reference Architectural Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI 4.0). https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/a2-schweichhart-reference_architectural_model_industrie_4.0_rami_4.0.pdf. Accessed 17 Mar 2019

  4. Alter, St.: Defining Information systems as work systems: implication for the IS field. Bus. Anal. Inf. Syst. Paper 22 (2008). http://repository.usfca.edu/at/22. Accessed 17 Mar 2019

  5. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K.: A glorious and not-so-short history of the information systems field. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4, 188–235 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weik, M.H.: Information system. In: Weik, M.H. (ed.) Computer Science and Communications Dictionary. Springer, Boston (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0613-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. International Conference on Information Systems ICIS 2019. https://icis2019.aisconferences.org/submissions/call-for-papers/. Accessed 17 Mar 2019

  8. The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2 Overview. https://www.opengroup.org/togaf. Accessed 17 Mar 2019

  9. Franck, T., Iacob, M.-E., van Sinderen, M., Wombacher, A.: Towards an integrated architecture model of smart manufacturing enterprises. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) BMSD 2017. LNBIP, vol. 309, pp. 112–133. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78428-1_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Stanescu, A.M., Repta, D., Moisescu, M.A., Sacala, I.S., Benea, M.: Towards a generic enterprise systems architecture based on cyber-physical systems principles. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 2014. IFIPAICT, vol. 434, pp. 245–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44745-1_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandkuhl, K., Smirnov, A., Shilov, N.: Cyber-physical systems in an enterprise context: from enterprise model to system configuration. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2015. LNBIP, vol. 228, pp. 148–159. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26762-3_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Basl, J.: Analysis of Industry 4.0 readiness indexes and maturity models and proposal of the dimension for enterprise information systems. In: Tjoa, A.M., Raffai, M., Doucek, P., Novak, N.M. (eds.) CONFENIS 2018. LNBIP, vol. 327, pp. 57–68. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99040-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Pisching, M.A., Pessoa, M.A.O., Junqueira, F., Miyagi P.: PFS/PN technique to model Industry 4.0 systems based on RAMI 4.0. In: 2018 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), vol. 1, pp. 1153–1156 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mourtzis, D., Gargallis, A. Zogopoulos, V.: Modelling of Customer Oriented Applications in Product Lifecycle using RAMI 4.0. Procedia Manuf. 28, 31–36 (2019). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978918313489. Accessed 31 Mar 2019

  15. Pisching, M.A. Pessoa, M.A.O., Junqueira, F., Filho, D.J.S., Miyagi, P.A.: An architecture based on RAMI 4.0 to discover equipment to process operations required by products, Comput. Ind. Eng. 125, 574–591 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nardello, M., Møller, Ch., Gøtze, J.: Organizational learning supported by Reference Architecture Models: Industry 4.0 laboratory study. Complex Syst. Inform. Model. Q. CSIMQ, Issue (12), 22–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2017-12.02. Accessed 31 Mar 2019

  17. Alter, St., Bork, D.: Work System Modeling Method with Different Levels of Specificity and Rigor for Different Stakeholder Purposes (2019). http://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/5841/. Accessed 31 Mar 2019

  18. Alter, S.: The Work System Method: Connecting People, Processes, and IT for Business Results. Work System Press, Lankspur (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alter, S.: Work system theory: overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14, 72–121 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frazzon, E.M., Hartmann, J., Makuschewitz, T.H., Sholz-Reiter, B.: Towards socio-cyber-physical systems in production networks. Procedia CIPR 7, 49–54 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anda, A.A.: Modeling adaptive socio-cyber-physical systems with goals and SysML. In: Proceedings of IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 442–447. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stern, H., Becker, H.: Development of a model for the integration of human factors in cyber-physical production systems. Procedia Manuf. 9, 151–158 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marite Kirikova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kirikova, M. (2019). Challenges in Enterprise and Information Systems Modeling in the Contexts of Socio Cyber Physical Systems. In: Pergl, R., Babkin, E., Lock, R., Malyzhenkov, P., Merunka, V. (eds) Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. EOMAS 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 366. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35646-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35646-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35645-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35646-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics