Skip to main content

Perception of Creative Responses to Moral Dilemmas by a Conversational Robot

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11876))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Moral HRI is investigating humans’ perception and reasoning regarding robots’ responses to moral dilemmas. Understanding moral dilemmas as cases of tragedy, we identify creative responses as an alternative to responses based on ethical principles such as deontology or utilitarianism. We propose a computational procedure based on AI planning that can generate such responses. We report results from an exploratory study to obtain a preliminary understanding of how the character of creative ethical reasoning robots is perceived compared to the more commonly discussed utilitarian and deontological robots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Asimov, I.: Runaround. Gnome Press, New York (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Awad, E., et al.: The moral machine experiment. Nature 563, 59–64 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpinella, C.M., Wyman, A.B., Perez, M.A., Stroessner, S.J.: The robotic social attributes scale (RoSAS): development and validation. In: HRI 2017 Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 254–262 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J.: Sure, i’m creative – but not in mathematics!: self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical. Stud. Arts. 22(2), 143–155 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kohlberg, L.: The Philosophy of Moral Development Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. Harper & Row, San Francisco (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhnert, B., Lindner, F., Bentzen, M.M., Ragni, M.: Perceived difficulty of moral dilemmas depends on their causal structure: a formal model and preliminary results. In: Proceedings of the COGSCI 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindner, F., Bentzen, M.M.: The hybrid ethical reasoning agent IMMANUEL. In: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 187–188. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lindner, F., Mattmüller, R., Nebel, B.: Moral permissibility of action plans. In: Proceedings of AAAI, vol. 2019, no. 33, pp. 7635–7642 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindner, F., Wächter, L., Bentzen, M.M.: Discussions about lying with an ethical reasoning robot. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1445–1450. IEEE, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Malle, B.F., Scheutz, M., Arnold, T., Voiklis, J., Cusimano, C.: Sacrifice one for the good of many?: people apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. In: HRI 2015 Proceedings of the 2015 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 117–124. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Runco, M.A.: Everyone has creative potential. In: Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., Singer, J.L. (eds.) Everyone Has Creative Potential, pp. 21–30. American Psychological Association, Washington (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sommaggio, P., Marchiori, S.: Break the chains: a new way to consider machine’s moral problems. BioLaw J. Rivista di BioDiritto 3, 241–257 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wächter, L., Lindner, F.: An explorative comparison of blame attributions to companion robots across various moral dilemmas. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI 2018), pp. 269–276. ACM, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weber, T.B.: Tragic dilemmas and the priority of the moral. J. Ethics. 4(3), 191–209 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009864421398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weston, A.: Creative Problem-Solving in Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Lindner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lindner, F., Kuhnert, B., Wächter, L., Möllney, K. (2019). Perception of Creative Responses to Moral Dilemmas by a Conversational Robot. In: Salichs, M., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35888-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35887-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35888-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics