Skip to main content

Why Should We Use Quantum Theory?

The Case of Human Sciences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quantum Interaction (QI 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11690))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Why is quantum theory so universal? Why does it apply to so many situations beyond the field of microphysics? To answer such questions, we can find inspiration from a remarkable reflection of the French philosopher of Science Jean Cavaillès about probabilities: “If any physical law is nothing else than a gamble for action, the scandal of probabilities ceases: far from being an inadequate substitute for our power to know, probabilities must be seen as the paradigm and the foundation of all scientific activity” [6].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Apel, K.O.: L’a priori du corps dans le problème de la connaissance. Cerf (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bitbol, M.: Mécanique quantique, une introduction philosophique. Flammarion (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bitbol, M.: Some steps towards a transcendental deduction of quantum mechanics. Philosophia Nat. 35, 253–280 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bitbol, M.: De l’intérieur du monde: pour une philosophie et une science des relations. Flammarion (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bohr, N.: The Unity of Human Knowledge, Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, vol. 3. Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cavaillès, J.: Du collectif au pari, àpropos de quelques théories récentes sur les probabilités. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 47(2), 139–163 (1940)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Destouches, J.L.: Prévisions, calcul et réalités. Les Grands problèmes des sciences (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Destouches, J.L.: La Mécanique Ondulatoire. Les Etudes Philosophiques 4(3), 473–474 (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Destouches-Février, P.: La structure des théories physiques. Presses Universitaires de France (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eddington, A.S.: Space, Time and Gravitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fuchs, C.A.: QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1003.5209 (2010)

  12. Goldstein, K.: La structure de l’organisme. Gallimard, Paris (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grinbaum, A.: How device-independent approaches change the meaning of physical theory. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B: Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 58, 22–30 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Habermas, J.: Logique des sciences sociales et autres essais. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Healey, R.: The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Heelan, P.A.: Complementarity, context dependence, and quantum logic. Found. Phys. 1(2), 95–110 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708721

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Heisenberg, W.: Philosophie, Manuscrit de 1942. Edition du Seuil (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Høffding, H.: Filosofiske Problemer. Univ. Bogtr. (1902)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Høffding, H.: Relation som Kategori. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1921). Quoted by J. Faye, Niels Bohr, his Heritage and Legacy

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hjelmslev, L.: Prolégomènes àune théorie du langage. Minuit (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer-Abich, K.: Bohr’s Complementarity and Goldstein’s holism in reflective pragmatism. Mind Matter 2, 91–103 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Petersen, A.: The philosophy of Niels Bohr. Bull. At. Sci. 19(7), 8–14 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1963.11454520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Piaget, J.: Logique et connaissance scientifique. Gallimard-Pléiade, Paris (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rasmussen, M.: Le problème de l’observation en linguistique. Une comparaison entre Louis Hjelmslev et Niels Bohr. Louis Hjelmslev et la sémiotique contemporaine 24, 112 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ryle, G.: The Concept of Mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Searle, J.: The Construction of Social Reality. Allen Lane, Bristol (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, H., Sun, Y.: On quantum models of the human mind. Top. Cogn. Sci. 6(1), 98–103 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Watanabe, S.: Algebra of observation. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 37, 350–367 (1966)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Bitbol .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bitbol, M. (2019). Why Should We Use Quantum Theory?. In: Coecke, B., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11690. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35895-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35895-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35894-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35895-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics