Skip to main content

Spread Sampling and Its Applications on Graphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII (COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 881))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3146 Accesses

Abstract

Efficiently finding small samples with high diversity from large graphs has many practical applications such as community detection and online survey. This paper proposes a novel scalable node sampling algorithm for large graphs that can achieve better spread or diversity across communities intrinsic to the graph without requiring any costly pre-processing steps. The proposed method leverages a simple iterative sampling technique controlled by two parameters: infection rate, that controls the dynamics of the procedure and removal threshold that affects the end-of-procedure sampling size. We demonstrate that our method achieves very high community diversity with an extremely low sampling budget on both synthetic and real-world graphs, with either balanced or imbalanced communities. Additionally, we leverage the proposed technique for a very low sampling budget (only 2%) driven treatment assignment in Network A/B Testing scenario, and demonstrate competitive performance concerning baseline on both synthetic and real-world graphs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By design, our method achieves 100% expansion quality, a ratio of the neighborhood size of the sample to the number of unsampled nodes, as defined in [24] when the infection rate is exactly one node and removal threshold is one.

  2. 2.

    Evaluation is always performed on the ground truth communities.

  3. 3.

    The neighborhood inflation method [38] is also a highly cited work. We did not compare against it since according to [16], PPR performs better than the neighborhood inflation method.

  4. 4.

    Precisionrecall.

References

  1. Andersen, R., Chung, F., Lang, K.: Local graph partitioning using pagerank vectors. In: FOCS 2006, pp. 475–486 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Backstrom, L., Kleinberg, J.: Network bucket testing. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 615–624. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2008(10), P10008 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiericetti, F., Dasgupta, A., Kumar, R., Lattanzi, S., Sarlós, T.: On sampling nodes in a network. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 471–481. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chung, F.: Graph theory in the information age. Not. AMS 57(6), 726–732 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Karrer,B., Eckles, D., Ugander, J.: Design and analysis of experiments in networks: reducing bias from interference (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fortunato, S.: Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 486(3), 75–174 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(12), 7821–7826 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gjoka, M., Kurant, M., Butts, C.T., Markopoulou, A.: Walking in Facebook: a case study of unbiased sampling of OSNs. In: 2010 Proceedings IEEE Infocom, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gui, H., Xu, Y., Bhasin, A., Han, J.: Network A/B testing: from sampling to estimation. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 399–409. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hand, D.J.: Statistical analysis of network data: methods and models by Eric D. Kolaczyk. Int. Stat. Rev. 78(1), 135–135 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Handcock, M.S., Gile, K.J.: Modeling social networks from sampled data. Ann. Appl. Stat. 4(1), 5 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen, M.H., Hurwitz, W.N.: On the theory of sampling from finite populations. Ann. Math. Stat. 14(4), 333–362 (1943)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Karypis, G., Kumar, V.: A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20(1), 359–392 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Katzir, L., Liberty, E., Somekh, O.: Framework and algorithms for network bucket testing. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2012, pp. 1029–1036. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kloumann, I.M., Kleinberg, J.M.: Community membership identification from small seed sets. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1366–1375. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kohavi, R., Deng, A., Frasca, B., Walker, T., Xu, Y., Pohlmann, N.: Online controlled experiments at large scale. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2013, pp. 1168–1176. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kohavi, R., Deng, A., Longbotham, R., Xu, Y.: Seven rules of thumb for web site experimenters. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2014, pp. 1857–1866. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koutra, D., Shah, N., Vogelstein, J.T., Gallagher, B., Faloutsos, C.: D elta C on: principled massive-graph similarity function with attribution. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data (TKDD) 10(3), 28 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leskovec, J. Faloutsos, C.: Sampling from large graphs. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 631–636. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leskovec, J., SosiÄŤ, R.: SNAP: a general-purpose network analysis and graph-mining library. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 8(1), 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lohr, S.: Sampling: Design and Analysis. Nelson Education, Toronto (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Maiya, A.S., Berger-Wolf, T.Y.: Expansion and search in networks. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 239–248. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maiya, A.S., Berger-Wolf, T.Y.: Sampling community structure. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 701–710. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27(1), 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H., Teller, E.: Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21(6), 1087–1092 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Middleton, J.A., Aronow, P.M.: Unbiased estimation of the average treatment effect in cluster-randomized experiments

    Google Scholar 

  28. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford InfoLab (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ribeiro, B., Towsley, D.: Estimating and sampling graphs with multidimensional random walks. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pp. 390–403. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ruan, Y., Fuhry, D., Liang, J., Wang, Y., Parthasarathy, S.: Community discovery: simple and scalable approaches. In: User Community Discovery, pp. 23–54. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rubin, D.B.: Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 66(5), 688 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Saveski, M., Pouget-Abadie, J., Saint-Jacques, G., Duan, W., Ghosh, S., Xu, Y., Airoldi, E.M.: Detecting network effects: randomizing over randomized experiments. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1027–1035. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ugander, J., Karrer, B., Backstrom, L., Kleinberg, J.: Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universes. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2013, pp. 329–337. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, D., Li, Z., Xie, G.: Towards unbiased sampling of online social networks. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, Y.: Revisiting network sampling. Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, Y., Chakrabarti, A., Sivakoff, D., Parthasarathy, S.: Fast change point detection on dynamic social networks. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2992–2998. AAAI Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, Y., Chakrabarti, A., Sivakoff, D., Parthasarathy, S.: Hierarchical change point detection on dynamic networks. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference, pp. 171–179. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Whang, J.J., Gleich, D.F., Dhillon, I.S.: Overlapping community detection using seed set expansion. In: CIKM, pp. 2099–2108. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yang J., Leskovec, J.: Structure and overlaps of communities in networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.6228 (2012)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is funded by NSF grants DMS-1418265, IIS-1550302, and IIS-1629548.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Bandyopadhyay, B., Patel, V., Chakrabarti, A., Sivakoff, D., Parthasarathy, S. (2020). Spread Sampling and Its Applications on Graphs. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Mendes, J., Moro, E., Rocha, L. (eds) Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2019. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 881. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36687-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics