Skip to main content

Power Analysis and Protection on SPECK and Its Application in IoT

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Security and Privacy in Communication Networks (SecureComm 2019)

Abstract

Emerging applications such as the Internet of Things (IoT) promotes the development of lightweight cryptography. SPECK is a lightweight block cipher, specially designed for limited resource devices that was presented by National Security Agency. Nevertheless, before using SPECK in any practical application, protection against side-channel attacks must be paid attention to. In this paper, we take two attack positions into account and make effort to implement correlation power analysis on a naive software implementation of SPECK algorithm in the IoT application scenario. Our experimental results show that the real key fixed in the register can be successfully recovered when attack the XOR operations, while there is always an interference item that confuses the correct key when attack the modulo addition operation. Furthermore, we proposal a countermeasure against power attacks in the IoT application, and the protected SPECK only cost 53.01%, 6.27% and 318.18% of extra code, RAM and time, respectively.

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61872040, U1836101), National Cryptography Development Fund (No. MMJJ20170201), Foundation of Science and Technology on Information Assurance Laboratory (No. KJ-17-009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Eisenbarth, T., Kumar, S.S., Paar, C., Poschmann, A., Uhsadel, L.: A survey of lightweight-cryptography implementations. IEEE Des. Test Comput. 24(6), 522–533 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Omrani, T., Rhouma, R., Sliman, L.: Lightweight cryptography for resource-constrained devices: a comparative study and rectangle cryptanalysis. In: Bach Tobji, M.A., Jallouli, R., Koubaa, Y., Nijholt, A. (eds.) ICDEc 2018. LNBIP, vol. 325, pp. 107–118. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97749-2_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Banik, S., Pandey, S.K., Peyrin, T., Sasaki, Y., Sim, S.M., Todo, Y.: GIFT: a small present – towards reaching the limit of lightweight encryption. In: Fischer, W., Homma, N. (eds.) CHES 2017. LNCS, vol. 10529, pp. 321–345. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66787-4_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaulieu, R., Shors, D., Smith, J., Smith, T.-C., Weeks, B., Wingers, L.: The SIMON and SPECK Families of Lightweight Block Ciphers. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2013, 404 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heuser, A., Picek, S., Guilley, S., Mentens, N.: Side-channel analysis of lightweight ciphers: does lightweight equal easy? IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2017, 261 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bache, F., Plump, C., Gneysu, T.: Confident leakage assessment - a side-channel evaluation framework based on confidence intervals. In: DATE 2018, pp. 1117–1122 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi, J., Fukunaga, T.: Fault analysis on SIMON family of lightweight block ciphers. In: Lee, J., Kim, J. (eds.) ICISC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8949, pp. 175–189. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15943-0_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhasin, S., Graba, T., Danger, J.-L., Najm, Z.: A look into SIMON from a side-channel perspective. In: HOST 2014, pp. 56–59 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shanmugam, D., Selvam, R., Annadurai, S.: Differential power analysis attack on SIMON and LED block ciphers. In: Chakraborty, R.S., Matyas, V., Schaumont, P. (eds.) SPACE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8804, pp. 110–125. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12060-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Beaulieu, R., Shors, D., Smith, J., Treatman-Clark, S., Weeks, B., Wingers, L.: Notes on the design and analysis of SIMON and SPECK. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2017, 560 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Song, L., Huang, Z., Yang, Q.: Automatic differential analysis of ARX block ciphers with application to SPECK and LEA. In: Liu, J.K., Steinfeld, R. (eds.) ACISP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9723, pp. 379–394. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40367-0_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, C., İnci, M.S., Taha, M., Eisenbarth, T.: SpecTre: a tiny side-channel resistant speck core for FPGAs. In: Lemke-Rust, K., Tunstall, M. (eds.) CARDIS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10146, pp. 73–88. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54669-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kocher, P., Jaffe, J., Jun, B.: Differential power analysis. In: Wiener, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1999. LNCS, vol. 1666, pp. 388–397. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48405-1_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Gandolfi, K., Mourtel, C., Olivier, F.: Electromagnetic analysis: concrete results. In: Koç, Ç.K., Naccache, D., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2001. LNCS, vol. 2162, pp. 251–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44709-1_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Kocher, P.C.: Timing attacks on implementations of Diffie-Hellman, RSA, DSS, and other systems. In: Koblitz, N. (ed.) CRYPTO 1996. LNCS, vol. 1109, pp. 104–113. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68697-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Brier, E., Clavier, C., Olivier, F.: Correlation power analysis with a leakage model. In: Joye, M., Quisquater, J.-J. (eds.) CHES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3156, pp. 16–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28632-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Reparaz Dominguez, O.: Analysis and design of masking schemes for secure cryptographic implementations. Analyse en ontwerp van maskeringsschema’s voor veilige cryptografische implementaties. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stepnek, F., Bucek, J., Novotny, M.: Differential power analysis under constrained budget: low cost education of hackers. In: DSD, pp. 645–648 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mangard, S., Oswald, E., Popp, T.: Power Analysis Attacks. Springer, Boston (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38162-6. ISBN 978-0-387-30857-9, pp. I–XXIII, 1–37

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to An Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ge, J., Wang, A., Zhu, L., Liu, X., Shang, N., Zhang, G. (2019). Power Analysis and Protection on SPECK and Its Application in IoT. In: Chen, S., Choo, KK., Fu, X., Lou, W., Mohaisen, A. (eds) Security and Privacy in Communication Networks. SecureComm 2019. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 305. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37231-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37231-6_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37230-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37231-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics