Skip to main content

LIProMa: Label-Independent Process Matching

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 362))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The identification of best practices is an important methodology to improve the executions of processes. To determine those best practices process mining techniques analyze process entities and model specific views to highlight points for improvements. A major requirement in most approaches is a common activity space so events can be related directly. However there are instances which do provide multiple activity universes and processes from different sources need to be compared. For example in corporate finance, strategic operations like mergers or acquisitions cause processes with similar workflow but different descriptions to be merged. In this work we develop LIProMa, a method to compare processes based on their temporal flow of action sequences by solving the correlated transportation problem. Activity labels are purposely omitted in the comparison. Hence our novel method provides a similarity measure which is capable of comparing processes with diverging labels often caused by distributed executions and varying operators. Therefore it works orthogonal to conventional methods which rely on similarity between activity labels. Instead LIProMa establishes a correspondence between activities of two processes by focusing on temporal patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van der Aa, H., Gal, A., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.A., Sagi, T., Shraga, R.: Instance-based process matching using event-log information. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 283–297. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Aalst, W.: Data science in action. Process Mining, pp. 3–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. van Beest, N.R.T.P., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L., La Rosa, M.: Log delta analysis: interpretable differencing of business process event logs. In: Motahari-Nezhad, H.R., Recker, J., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9253, pp. 386–405. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolt, A., de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A visual approach to spot statistically-significant differences in event logs based on process metrics. In: Nurcan, S., Soffer, P., Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9694, pp. 151–166. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Buijs, J.C.A.M., Reijers, H.A.: Comparing business process variants using models and event logs. In: Bider, I., et al. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2014. LNBIP, vol. 175, pp. 154–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43745-2_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cordes, C., Vogelgesang, T., Appelrath, H.-J.: A generic approach for calculating and visualizing differences between process models in multidimensional process mining. In: Fournier, F., Mendling, J. (eds.) BPM 2014. LNBIP, vol. 202, pp. 383–394. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15895-2_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., Van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: metrics and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 36, 498–516 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klinkmüller, C., Leopold, H., Weber, I., Mendling, J., Ludwig, A.: Listen to me: improving process model matching through user feedback. In: Sadiq, S., Soffer, P., Völzer, H. (eds.) BPM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8659, pp. 84–100. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10172-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Pele, O., Werman, M.: Fast and robust earth mover’s distances. In: 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 460–467. IEEE, September 2009

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rubner, Y., Tomasi, C., Guibas, L.J.: The earth mover’s distance as a metric for image retrieval. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 40(2), 99–121 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Syamsiyah, A., et al.: Business process comparison: a methodology and case study. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 288, pp. 253–267. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59336-4_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Dongen, B.F. (Boudewijn): BPI challenge 2015 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4121/UUID:31A308EF-C844-48DA-948C-305D167A0EC1. https://data.4tu.nl/repository/uuid:31a308ef-c844-48da-948c-305d167a0ec1

  13. Van Dongen, B.F. (Boudewijn): BPI challenge 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4121/UUID:5F3067DF-F10B-45DA-B98B-86AE4C7A310B. https://data.4tu.nl/repository/uuid:5f3067df-f10b-45da-b98b-86ae4c7a310b

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Richter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Richter, F., Zellner, L., Azaiz, I., Winkel, D., Seidl, T. (2019). LIProMa: Label-Independent Process Matching. In: Di Francescomarino, C., Dijkman, R., Zdun, U. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 362. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37453-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37453-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37452-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37453-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics