Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Symmetry Breaking in Evacuation Exit Choice: Impacts of Cognitive Bias and Physical Factor on Evacuation Decision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11978))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When people evacuate from a room with two identical exits, it is known that these exits are often unequally used, with evacuees gathering at one of them. This inappropriate and irrational behavior sometimes results in serious loss of life. In this paper, this symmetry breaking in exit choice is discussed from the viewpoint of herding, a cognitive bias in humans during disaster evacuations. The aim of this paper is to show that simple herd behavior is sufficient to reproduce symmetry breaking in exit choice, whereas many models in the literature adopt predefined rules, scenarios, or some models representing rational decision making processes such as utility functions or payoff matrices. The evacuation decision model, based on the response threshold model in biology, is presented to reproduce human herd behavior. Simulation with the evacuation decision model shows that almost all agents gather at one exit at some frequency, despite individual agents choosing the exit randomly. Moreover, the social force model is employed in conjunction with the evacuation decision model to take physical factors such as clogging and collisions into account. The effects of physical factors on both evacuation decisions and evacuation times are analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    NetLogo 6.0.2 [41] is used to implement the models presented in this paper.

  2. 2.

    https://www.ted.com/talks/derek_sivers_how_to_start_a_movement.

References

  1. Agassounon, W., Martinoli, A.: Efficiency and robustness of threshold-based distributed allocation algorithms in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2002, vol. 3, pp. 1090–1097 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altshuler, E., Ramos, O., Nuñez, Y., Fernańdez, J., Batista-Leyva, A.J., Noda, C.: Symmetry breaking in escaping ants. Am. Nat. 166(6), 643–649 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Augustijn-Beckers, E.W., Flacke, J., Retsios, B.: Investigating the effect of different pre-evacuation behavior and exit choice strategies using agent-based modeling. Proc. Eng. 3, 23–35 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonabeau, E., Sobkowski, A., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.L.: Adaptive task allocation inspired by a model of division of labor in social insects. In: Proceeding of Biocomputing and Emergent Computation, pp. 36–45 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.L.: Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 263(1376), 1565–1569 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Castello, E., et al.: Adaptive foraging for simulated and real robotic swarms: the dynamical response threshold approach. Swarm Intell. 10(1), 1–31 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cutter, S., Barnes, K.: Evacuation behavior and three mile island. Disasters 6(2), 116–124 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duives, D.C., Mahmassani, H.S.: Exit choice decisions during pedestrian evacuations of buildings. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2316, 84–94 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dyer, J.R.G., et al.: Consensus decision making in human crowds. Anim. Behav. 75, 461–470 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elliott, D., Smith, D.: Football stadia disasters in the United Kingdom: learning from tragedy? Ind. Environ. Cris. Q. 7(3), 205–229 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fridolf, K., Ronchi, E., Nilsson, D., Frantzich, H.: Movement speed and exit choice in smoke-filled rail tunnels. Fire Saf. J. 59, 8–21 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haghani, M., Ejtemai, O., Sarvi, M., Sobhani, A., Burd, M., Aghabayk, K.: Random utility models of pedestrian crowd exit selection based on SP-off-RP experiments. Trans. Res. Proc. 2, 524–532 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haghani, M., Sarvi, M.: Human exit choice in crowd built environments: investigating underlying behavioural differences between normal egress and emergency evacuations. Fire Saf. J. 85, 1–9 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasegawa, E., Ishii, Y., Tada, K., Kobayashi, K., Yoshimura, J.: Lazy workers are necessary for long-term sustainability in insect societies. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016). Article number: 20846. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20846

  15. Helbing, D., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407(28), 487–490 (2000). http://angel.elte.hu/panic/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Helbing, D., Farkas, I.J., Molnar, P., Vicsek, T.: Simulation of pedestrian crowds in normal and evacuation situations. Pedestr. Evacuation Dyn. 21(2), 21–58 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Helbing, D., Molnár, P.: Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 51(5), 4282–4289 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Henrich, J., Boyd, R.: The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evol. Hum. Behav. 19, 215–241 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, H.J., Guo, R.Y.: Static floor field and exit choice for pedestrian evacuation in rooms with internal obstacles and multiple exits. Phys. Rev. E 78, 021131 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ji, Q., Xin, C., Tang, S., Huang, J.: Symmetry associated with symmetry break: revisiting ants and humans escaping from multiple-exit rooms. Phys. A (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.024

  21. Kirchner, A., Schadschneider, A.: Simulation of evacuation processes using a bionics-inspired cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. A 312, 260–276 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kobes, M., Helsloot, I., de Vries, B., Post, J.: Exit choice, (pre-)movement time and (pre-)evacuation behavior in hotel fire evacuation - Behavioural analysis and validation of the use of serious gaming in experimental research. Proc. Eng. 3, 37–51 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krieger, M.J.B., Billeter, J.B., Keller, L.: Ant-like task allocation and recruitment in cooperative robots. Nature 406, 992–995 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lo, S., Huang, H., Wang, P., Yuen, K.: A game theory based exit selection model for evacuation. Fire Saf. J. 41, 364–369 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lovreglio, R., Fonzone, A., dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A.: The role of herding behaviour in exit choice during evacuation. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 160, 390–399 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lovreglio, R., Borri, D., dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A.: A discrete choice model based on random utilities for exit choice in emergency evacuations. Saf. Sci. 62, 418–426 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lovreglio, R., Fonzone, A., dell’Olio, L.: A mixed logit model for predicting exit choice during building evacuations. Transaportation Res. Part A Policy Pract. 92, 59–75 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lovreglio, R., Fonzone, A., dell’Olio, L., Borri, D.: A study of herding behaviour in exit choice during emergencies based on random utility theory. Saf. Sci. 82, 421–431 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Low, K.H., Leow, W.K., Ang Jr., M.H.: Task allocation via self-organizing swarm coalitions in distributed mobile sensor network. In: AAAI 2004 Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 28–33 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Onishi, M., Yamashita, T., Hoshikawa, T., Sato, K.: Transmission of knowledge for evacuation drill using pedestrian tracking and simulation - example of opera concert with evacuation drill in new national theater, Tokyo. In: Handouts in SIGCONF 2015. The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence SIG-KST-026-06 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pan, X.: Computational modeling of human and social behaviour for emergency egress analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pan, X., Han, C.S., Law, K.H.: A multi-agent based simulation framework for the study of human and social behaviour in egress analysis. In: 2005 International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, pp. 1–12 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Perez, G.J., Tapang, G., Lim, M., Saloma, C.: Streaming, disruptive interference and power-law behavior in the exit dynamics of confined pedestrians. Phys. A 312, 609–618 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Raafat, R.M., Chater, N., Frith, C.: Herding in humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13(10), 420–428 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saloma, C., Perez, G.J., Tapang, G., Lim, M., Palmes-Saloma, C.: Self-organized queuing and scale-free behavior in real escape panic. PNAS 100(21), 11947–11952 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J.: Adaptive modelling of social decision making by agents integrating simulated behaviour and perception chains. In: Pan, J.-S., Chen, S.-M., Nguyen, N.T. (eds.) ICCCI 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6421, pp. 284–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16693-8_31

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Shi, L., Xie, Q., Cheng, X., Chen, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, R.: Developing a database for emergency evacuation model. Build. Environ. 44, 1724–1729 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsurushima, A.: Simulating earthquake evacuation decisions based on herd behavior. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tsurushima, A.: Modeling herd behavior caused by evacuation decision making using response threshold. In: Davidsson, P., Verhagen, H. (eds.) MABS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11463, pp. 138–152. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22270-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsurushima, A.: Reproducing symmetry breaking in exit choice under emergency evacuation situation using response threshold model. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, ICAART, vol. 1, pp. 31–41. INSTICC, SciTePress (2019). https://doi.org/10.5220/0007256000310041

  41. Wilensky, U.: NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1999). http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

  42. Zia, K., Riener, A., Ferscha, A., Sharpanskykh, A.: Evacuation simulation based on cognitive decision making model in a socio-technical system. In: 15th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications, pp. 98–107 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Robert Ramirez, Yoshikazu Shinoda, and Kei Marukawa for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Intelligent Systems Laboratory, SECOM CO., LTD., 8-10-16 Shimorenjaku, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan

    Akira Tsurushima

Authors
  1. Akira Tsurushima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Tsurushima .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Jaap van den Herik

  2. LIACC, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Ana Paula Rocha

  3. ICREA, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Barcelona, Spain

    Luc Steels

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tsurushima, A. (2019). Symmetry Breaking in Evacuation Exit Choice: Impacts of Cognitive Bias and Physical Factor on Evacuation Decision. In: van den Herik, J., Rocha, A., Steels, L. (eds) Agents and Artificial Intelligence. ICAART 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11978. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37494-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37494-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37493-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37494-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation