Skip to main content

Release Planning in a Hybrid Project Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Agile and User-Centred Software Engineering (LASD 2019, MIDI 2019)

Abstract

Context: Even regulated domains like the automotive domain increasingly adopt agile software development. However, traditional sequential processes are still in use and have to coexist with the new development approaches. Collaboration between agile and hybrid projects within complex traditional product development processes is challenging, especially regarding the creation and synchronization of a qualification phase plan. Objective: The aim of this study is to motivate research related to the combined use of agile and traditional paradigms in release planning in the automotive domain and to report challenges from industry. Method: We introduce and motivate the research topic and discuss related work based on the results of a small literature study. Further, an online survey with 56 respondents from an automotive Original Equipment Manufacturer was conducted. Results: There is a clear research gap regarding release planning for combined agile and traditional projects. The state-of-the-practice survey identified challenges, such as a lack of transparency regarding the status quo of related projects. Conclusions: The research gap as well as the challenges from industry should motivate further research on this topic, in order to improve release planning processes in this specific context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.scopus.com.

References

  1. VersionOne: the 13th annual state of agile report (2019). www.collab.net

  2. Diebold, P., Zehler, T.: The right degree of agility in rich processes. Managing Software Process Evolution, pp. 15–37. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31545-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Klünder, J., et al.: HELENA Study: reasons for combining agile and traditional software development approaches in German companies. In: Felderer, M., Méndez Fernández, D., Turhan, B., Kalinowski, M., Sarro, F., Winkler, D. (eds.) PROFES 2017. LNCS, vol. 10611, pp. 428–434. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69926-4_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Diebold, P., Theobald, S.: How is agile development currently being used in regulated embedded domains? J. Softw. Evol. Process 30(8), e1935 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hohl, P., Münch, J., Schneider, K., Stupperich, M.: Forces that prevent agile adoption in the automotive domain. In: Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds.) PROFES 2016. LNCS, vol. 10027, pp. 468–476. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhrmann, M., et al.: Hybrid software and system development in practice: waterfall, scrum, and beyond. In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Software and System Process, pp. 30–39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3084100.3084104

  7. Theobald, S., Diebold, P.: Interface problems of agile in a non-agile environment. In: Garbajosa, J., Wang, X., Aguiar, A. (eds.) XP 2018. LNBIP, vol. 314, pp. 123–130. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91602-6_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Broy, M.: Challenges in automotive software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 33–42. ACM (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134292

  9. Marner, K., Theobald, S., Wagner, S.: Real-Life challenges in automotive release planning. In: Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp. 831–839 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15439/2019f326

  10. Ruhe, G., Saliu, M.O.: The art and science of software release planning. IEEE Softw. 22(6), 47–53 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG: Methodenleitfaden für agiles Arbeiten bei Porsche (guidelines for agility at Porsche) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heikkilä, V.T., Paasivaara, M., Rautiainen, K., Lassenius, C., Toivola, T., Järvinen, J.: Operational release planning in large-scale scrum with multiple stakeholders–a longitudinal case study at F-Secure Corporation. In: Information and Software Technology, vol. 57, pp. 116–140 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.09.005

  13. Sax, E., Reussner, R., Guissouma, H., Klare, H.: A Survey on the State and Future of Automotive Software Release and Configuration Management. Karlsruhe Reports in Informatics, 11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000075673

  14. Bestfleisch, U., Herbst, J., Reichert, M.: Requirements for the workflow-based support of release management processes in the automotive sector. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Concurrent Engineering Conference ECEC 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Müller, D., Herbst, J., Hammori, M., Reichert, M.: IT support for release management processes in the automotive industry. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, Amit P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 368–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11841760_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindgren, M., Land, R., Norström, C., Wall, A.: Key aspects of software release planning in industry. In: Proceedings of the 19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 320–329 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/aswec.2008.4483220

  17. Danesh, A.S., Ahmad, R.B., Saybani, M.R., Tahir, A.: Companies approaches in software release planning-based on multiple case studies. JSW 7(2), 471–478 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.7.2.471-478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heikkilä, Ville T., Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C., Engblom, C.: Continuous release planning in a large-scale scrum development organization at ericsson. In: Baumeister, H., Weber, B. (eds.) XP 2013. LNBIP, vol. 149, pp. 195–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38314-4_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Heikkilä, V., Rautiainen, K., Jansen, S.: A revelatory case study on scaling agile release planning. In: Proceedings of the 2010 36th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 289–296 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/seaa.2010.37

  20. Karvonen, T., Behutiye, W., Oivo, M., Kuvaja, P.: Systematic literature review on the impacts of agile release engineering practices. Inf. Softw. Technol. 86, 87–100 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ameller, D., Farré, C., Franch, X., Rufian, G.: A survey on software release planning models. In: Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds.) PROFES 2016. LNCS, vol. 10027, pp. 48–65. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Svahnberg, M., Gorschek, T., Feldt, R., Torkar, R., Saleem, S.B., Shafique, M.U.: A systematic review on strategic release planning models. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 237–248 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlshamre, P.: Release planning in market-driven software product development: provoking an understanding. Requir. Eng. 7(3), 139–151 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007660200010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jantunen, S., Lehtola, L., Gause, D.C., Dumdum, U.R., Barnes, R.J.: The challenge of release planning. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Software Product Management, pp. 36–45 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/iwspm.2011.6046202

  25. Benestad, H.C., Hannay, J.E: A comparison of model-based and judgment-based release planning in incremental software projects. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 766–775 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1985793.1985901

  26. Spiegler, S.V., Heinecke, C., Wagner, S.: Leadership gap in agile teams: how teams and scrum masters mature. In: Kruchten, P., Fraser, S., Coallier, F. (eds.) XP 2019. LNBIP, vol. 355, pp. 37–52. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19034-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Marner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marner, K., Theobald, S., Wagner, S. (2020). Release Planning in a Hybrid Project Environment. In: Przybyłek, A., Morales-Trujillo, M. (eds) Advances in Agile and User-Centred Software Engineering. LASD MIDI 2019 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 376. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37534-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37534-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37533-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37534-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics