Skip to main content

Engineering the Black-Box Meta Model of Data Exploration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Enterprise Engineering XIII (EEWC 2019)

Abstract

With an increasing amount and diversity of available data, data exploration is becoming critical for many businesses to create insights for business innovation. From an analysis and design perspective, however, data exploration is still dominated by IT-oriented modeling concepts that make it difficult to engage business users because they are not used to think in terms of (even conceptual) data structures, but rather in terms of business questions, intended insights, decision context, information quality, etc. This study elaborates requirements for conceptualizing data exploration from a business perspective, discusses to what extent existing business-oriented conceptualizations fulfil such requirements, and consolidates promising modeling concepts into a meta model proposal that links purpose, context, domain knowledge, exploration history, business question, available data, user, decision, business insight, presentation and non-user stakeholder as key concepts. The meta model is demonstrated by instantiating it to conceptualize five exemplary data exploration use cases, and first evaluative evidence is presented. The paper closes with a discussion how to transform the proposed meta model into an innovative data exploration analysis and design tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Winter, R.: Blackboxing data-conceptualizing data-driven exploration from a business perspective. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds.) The Art of Structuring, pp. 153–163. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. El Arass, M., Tikito, I., Souissi, N.: Data lifecycles analysis: towards intelligent cycle. In: IEEE ISCV, vol. 1, pp. 1–8. Fez Morocco (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/isacv.2017.8054938

  3. Bumblauskas, D., Nold, H., Bumblauskas, P., Igou, A.: Big data analytics: transforming data to action. Bus. Process Manag. J. 23(3), 703–720 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2016-0056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. From insight to impact: unlocking opportunities in big data, 18 October 2018. https://www.cgma.org/resources/reports/insight-to-impact-big-data.html

  5. Elbashir, M.Z., Collier, P.A., Sutton, S.G., Davern, M.J., Leech, S.A.: Enhancing the business value of business intelligence: the role of shared knowledge and assimilation. J. Inf. Syst. 27(2), 87–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson, S., Arbez, G., Birta, L.G., Tolk, A., Wagner, G.: Conceptual modeling: definition, purpose and benefits. In: Yilmaz, L., et al. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2812–2826. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/wsc.2015.7408386

  7. Chakiri, H., El Mohajir, M., Assem, N.: CMCD: A data warehouse modeling framework based on goals and business process models. In: 2017 IEEE AFRICON, Cape Town, pp. 923–928 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/afrcon.2017.8095605

  8. Pourshahid, A., Richards, G., Amyot, D.: Toward a goal-oriented, business intelligence decision-making framework. In: Babin, G., Stanoevska-Slabeva, K., Kropf, P. (eds.) MCETECH 2011. LNBIP, vol. 78, pp. 100–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20862-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Horkoff, J., et al.: Strategic business modeling: representation and reasoning. Softw. Syst. Model. 13(3), 1015–1041 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0290-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nalchigar, S., Yu, E.: Business-driven data analytics: a conceptual modeling framework. Data Knowl. Eng. 117, 359–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2018.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LaValle, S., Hopkins, M., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Kruschwitz, N.: Analytics: the new path to value (2010). https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/analytics-the-new-path-to-value/

  12. Forgó, N., Hänold, S., Schütze, B.: The principle of purpose limitation and big data. In: Corrales, M., Fenwick, M., Forgo, N. (eds.) New Technology, Big Data and the Law. PLBI, pp. 17–42. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5038-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Christoffersson, A., Karlsson, C.H.: Developing a framework for business analytics: a structure for turning data into actionable insights. Master’s thesis of Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, Report No. E2015:092 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sotsenko, A.: A Rich Context Model Design and Implementation. Faculty of Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Antunes, B., Correia, F., Gomes, P.: Towards a software developer context model. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, p. 618 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Open Banking Working Group: Data exploration opportunities in corporate banking (2017). https://www.abe-eba.eu/epaper/epaper-data_exploration_opportunities_in_corporate_banking/epaper/ausgabe.pdf

  17. Zhao, D.: Frontiers of big data business analytics: patterns and cases in online marketing. In: Liebowitz, J. (ed.) Big Data and Business Analytics, pp. 43–67. Auerbach Publications, New York (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Goes, P. Big data and IS research. MIS Q. 38(3), III–VIII (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tan, S., Chan, T.: Defining and conceptualizing actionable insight: a conceptual framework for decision-centric analytics. Presented at the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2015). arXiv:1605.01032

  20. Bohanec, M., Robnik-Šikonja, M., Borštnar, M.K.: Decision-making framework with double-loop learning through interpretable black-box machine learning models. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 117(7), 1389–1406 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kohavi, R., Rothleder, N.J., Simoudis, E.: Emerging trends in business analytics. Commun. ACM 45(8), 45–48 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reichle, R., et al.: A comprehensive context modeling framework for pervasive computing systems. In: Meier, R., Terzis, S. (eds.) DAIS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5053, pp. 281–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68642-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Kotte, O., Elorriaga, A., Stokić, D., Scholze, S.: Context sensitive solution for collaborative decision making on quality assurance in software development processes. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 255, 130–139 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-264-6-130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoerl, R.W., Snee, R.D., De Veaux, R.D.: Applying statistical thinking to ‘Big Data’ problems. WIREs Comput. Stat. 6(4), 222–232 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Derthick, M., Roth, S.F.: Enhancing data exploration with a branching history of user operations. Knowl.-Based Syst. 14(1–2), 65–74 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00101-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitney, H.: Data Insights: New Ways to Visualize and Make Sense of Data. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. James Bell Associates: Guide to data-driven decision making: using data to inform practice and policy decisions in child welfare organizations. Children’s Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, H., Roger, H.L.C., Storey, V.C.: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36(4), 1165–1188 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2307/41703503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling: foundational concepts, prospects and future research challenges. Softw. Syst. Model. 13(3), 941–962 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0273-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Davenport, T.H., Harris, J.G., Delong, D.W., Jacobson, A.L.: Data to knowledge to results: building an analytic capability. Calif. Manag. Rev. 43(2), 117–138 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Law, P., Basole, R.C.: Designing breadth-oriented data exploration for mitigating cognitive biases, 15 November 2018. http://decisive-workshop.dbvis.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/0107-paper.pdf

  32. Sarvghad, A., Tory, M., Mahyar, N.: Visualizing dimension coverage to support exploratory analysis. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graph. 23(1), 21–30 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Plale, B., Kouper, I.: Chapter 4 - The centrality of data: data lifecycle and data pipelines. In: Chowdhury, M., Apon, A., Dey, K. (eds.) Data Analytics for Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 91–111. Elsevier (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809715-1.00004-3

  34. Hubert Ofner, M., Straub, K., Otto, B., Oesterle, H.: Management of the master data lifecycle: a framework for analysis. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 26(4), 472–491 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-05-2013-0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. A primer on the decision model. https://www.sapiensdecision.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/A-Primer-on-The-Decision-Model-1.pdf

  36. Klein, G., Jarosz, A.: A naturalistic study of insight. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Making 5(4), 335–351 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343411427013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. El Arass, M., Tikito, I., Souissi, N.: Data lifecycles analysis: towards intelligent cycle. In: Proceeding of The Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision, ISCV 2017, pp. 1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/isacv.2017.8054938

  38. Shneiderman, B.: The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pp. 336–343 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1109/vl.1996.545307

  39. Chi, E.H.: A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 69–75 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/infvis.2000.885092

  40. Gotz, D., Zhou, M.X.: Characterizing users’ visual analytic activity for insight provenance. Inf. Vis. 8(1), 42–55 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wee, B., et al.: Data-driven decision-management: a values-focused approach to enable traceable decision analytics for adaptive climate resilience. Paper presented at the ESIP Winter Meeting, Bethesda, MD (2017). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4515722

  42. Eichmann, P., Zgraggen, E., Zhao, Z., Binnig, C., Kraska, T.: Towards a benchmark for interactive data exploration. Bull. Tech. Comm. Data Eng. 39(4), 50–61 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shao, Q., Li, Y., Campbell, E., De Boer, E.S., Laginestra, E., Statzenko, A.: Statistical visualization for data exploration: a case study on Sydney Olympic Park. Chemosphere 52(9), 1601–1614 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00500-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nunes, T., Schwabe, D.: Frameworks for information exploration-a case study. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Exploration of Semantic Data-IESD, IESD@ISWC, p. 16 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shih, M., Liu, D., Hsu, M.: Discovering competitive intelligence by mining changes in patent trends. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(4), 2882–2890 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Li, H., Fan, H., Mao, F.: A visualization approach to air pollution data exploration-a case study of Air Quality Index (PM2.5) in Beijing, China. Atmosphere 7(3), 35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7030035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Edmondson, A.C., Harvey, J.-F.: Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 28(4), 347–360 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Avdiji, H., Elikan, D., Missonier, S., Pigneur, Y.: Designing tools for collectively solving ill-structured problems. In: 51st Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 51), pp. 400–409. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Osterwalder, A.: The business model ontology-a proposition in a design science approach. Ph.D. thesis, University of Lausanne (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Winter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Winter, R., Yang, L. (2020). Engineering the Black-Box Meta Model of Data Exploration. In: Aveiro, D., Guizzardi, G., Borbinha, J. (eds) Advances in Enterprise Engineering XIII. EEWC 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 374. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37933-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37933-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37932-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37933-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics