Abstract
This paper mainly studies English dative alternation from a diachronic point of view. As a verb of caused-possession, the typical ditransitive verb give is contrasted with send and tell in respect of their different structural biases diachronically (12th–19th centuries). We built dynamic, syn-diachronic structural models, and made contrastive observations on structural biases of the verbs. The verb give shows a strong tendency to occur in the double object construction, send has a structural bias towards the prepositional object construction and tell shows preference for the clausal complement diachronically, which suggests the determining role of lexical semantics of the verb in its structural preference and the meaning of syntactic structures in which the verb occurs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Example sentences in (1) are extracted from British National Corpus (BNC).
References
Zhu, D.X.: Grammatical problems related to the verb “gei”. Dialect 02, 81–87 (1979)
Peyraube, A.: Double-object constructions—Historical development from Han times to the Tang dynasty. Stud. Chin. Lang. 3, 204–216 (1986)
Zhang, B.J.: Ditransitive constructions in modern Chinese. Stud. Chin. Lang. 3, 175–184 (1999)
Zhang, G.X.: The Grammaticalization of Chinese Double Object Constructions and the semantics of “Yuan” sentences. In: Jie, X. (ed.) Typological Perspectives in Chinese Studies, pp. 345–373. Beijing Language and Culture University Press, Beijing (2005)
Goldberg, A.E.: Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1995)
Goldberg, A.E.: Constructions at Work. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Rappaport Hovav, M., Levin, B.: Building verb meanings. In: Butt, M., Geuder, W. (eds.) The Projection of Arguments, pp. 97–134. CSLI (1998)
Rappaport Hovav, M., Levin, B.: The English dative alternation: the case for verb sensitivity. J. Linguist. 44(01), 129–167 (2008)
Haspelmath, M.: Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: a usage-based approach. Constructions 2, 1–71 (2004)
Haspelmath, M.: Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguist. Discovery 3(1), 1–21 (2005)
Haspelmath, M.: Ditransitive constructions: the verb ‘give’. In: Haspelmath, M., et al. (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 426–429. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Kittilä, S.: The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity. Linguistics 44, 569–612 (2006)
Malchukov, A., Haspelmath, M., Comrie, B.: Ditransitive construction: a typological overview. In: Malchukov, A., Haspelmath, M., Comrie, B. (eds.) Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, pp. 1–64. De Gruyter, Berlin (2010)
Bresnan, J., Hay, J.: Gradient Grammar: an effect of Animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 118(2), 245–259 (2008)
Bresnan, J., Ford, M.: Predicting syntax: processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1), 186–213 (2010)
Pinker, S.: Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)
Levin, B.: English Verb Classes and Alternations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)
Jackendoff, R.: Semantic Structures. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)
Ma, Q.Z.: Constructions with double objects in Modern Chinese. Essays Linguist. 10, 166–196 (1983)
Li, L.D.: Verbal objects and structural objects. Lang. Teach. Res. 03, 103–123 (1984)
Shi, B.: Study of the Double Object Construction in Ancient Chinese (Doctoral Dissertation). Anhui University (2003)
Xu, H.: A study on the give-type verbs in ancient Chinese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Northeast Normal University (2018)
Zhang, M.: Revisiting the alignment typology of ditransitive constructions in Chinese dialects. Bull. Chin. Linguist. 4(2), 87–270 (2011)
Bresnan, J., Nikitina, T.: On the Gradience of the Dative Alternation. Stanford University, Stanford (2003)
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M.: The learnability and acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English. Language 65(2), 203–257 (1989)
Wasow, T., Arnold, J.: Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In: Rohdenburg, G., Mondorf, B. (eds.) Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, pp. 119–154. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York (2003)
Mukherjee, J.: English Ditransitive verbs. Aspects of Theory, Description and a Usage-based Model. Rodopi, Amsterdam/New York (2005)
Ruppenhofer, J.K.: The Interaction of Valence and Information Structure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lyu, G., Gao, Y. (2020). A Diachronic Study of Structure Patterns of Ditransitive Verbs. In: Hong, JF., Zhang, Y., Liu, P. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11831. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38189-9_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38189-9_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38188-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38189-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)