Skip to main content

Chat-Interviews as a Means to Explore Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions on Developing Video Games with Unity in Computer Science Classes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education (ICL 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1134))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 922 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we explore how students perceived developing video games with Unity. The hypothesis behind the endeavour is that the prospect of being able to develop one’s own video game in a computer science class would make it easier for students to overcome the steep learning curve typically in place when learning to program. As a means of research, we employed chat-interviews for answering the overall research question “How do students perceive a learning sequence aimed at the development of computational thinking and coding competencies through video-game development?”. More specifically, we wanted to know whether students found the task of game-development motivating or not, which aspect or project-phase of game-development they found most motivating, most entertaining, most appealing, least appealing, most difficult, etc. Furthermore, we were interested in what students found most helpful while working with Unity, what they had learned, and which mode of learning – listening to lectures or independent work – appealed to them most. The analysis of the results of the first cycle of chat-interviews has shown that the main motivational factors were the focus on game-design and the option of cooperative work in small teams. The programming act itself using Visual Studio and C# was seen as the most difficult activity. The results of our research indicate that learners are highly motivated by the outlook of developing an interactive video game as opposed to other programming applications. Chat-interviews improved the research process by eliminating one of the most time-consuming steps – the transcription of interview data – and allowing some learners to more openly express their opinions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Unity Technologies (2019). Unity game engine. http://unity3d.com/. Accessed 31 January 2019

  3. Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books Inc., New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Papert, S.: The children’s machine. Technol. Rev.-Manchester NH- 96, 28 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lye, S.Y., Koh, J.H.L.: Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: what is next for K-12? Comput. Hum. Behav. 41, 51–61 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, F., Kaufman, D., Fraser, S.: Using video games in computer science education. Eur. Sci. J. ESJ 10, 37–52 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, A., Biu, W.: The Use of Game Development in Computer Science and Software Engineering Education. http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~alfw/publications/Use_of_Games_In_SE_and_CS_Education.pdf. Accessed 2 August 2018

  8. Comber, O., Motschnig, R.: Challenges and opportunities in employing game development in computer science classes. In: presented at the EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2015, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saines, G.,. Erickson, S, Winter, N.: Code Combat. https://codecombat.com/. Accessed 11 August 2018

  10. CodeMonkey| Coding Game for Kids. https://www.playcodemonkey.com/. Accessed 20 May 2019

  11. Resnick, M., et al.: Scratch: programming for all. Commun. ACM 52, 60–67 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mönig, J., Harvey, B.: Snap! — Build Your Own Blocks (2018). https://snap.berkeley.edu/. Accessed 18 September 2018

  13. Wilensky, U., Rand, W.: An introduction to agent-based modeling: modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reichert, R.: Website - Kara. https://www.swisseduc.ch/informatik/karatojava/index.html. Accessed 18 September 2018

  15. Kölling, M.: The greenfoot programming environment. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 10, 14 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Repenning, A., Sumner, T.: Agentsheets: a medium for creating domain-oriented visual languages. Computer 28, 17–25 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ioannidou, A., Repenning, A., Webb, D.C.: AgentCubes: Incremental 3D end-user development. J. Visual Lang. Comput. 20, 236–251 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dickson, P.E.: Using unity to teach game development: when you’ve never written a game. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Vilnius, Lithuania (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Çakır, N.A., Gass, A., Foster, A., Lee, F.J.: Development of a game-design workshop to promote young girls’ interest towards computing through identity exploration. Comput. Educ. 108, 115–130 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mayring, P.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In: Mruck, G.M.K. (ed.) Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, pp. 601–613. Springer, Wiesbaden (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Flick, U.: Qualitative sozialforschung (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kvale, S.: Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davis, M., Bolding, G., Hart, G., Sherr, L., Elford, J.: Reflecting on the experience of interviewing online: perspectives from the Internet and HIV study in London. AIDS care 16, 944–952 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dunkels, E., Enochsson, A.: Interviews with young people using online chat. In: Encyclopedia of Information Ethics and Security, pp. 403–410. IGI Global, Pennsylvania (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maxcy, S.J.: Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: the search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In: Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp. 51–89 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Olsen, W.: Triangulation in social research: qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. Dev. Sociol. 20, 103–118 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A.: Mixed methods research. In: The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 285–300 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jick, T.D.: Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Adm. Sci. Q. 24(4), 602–611 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brannen, J.: Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Routledge, Abingdon (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. The GIMP Team GIMP - The GNU Image Manipulation Program. https://www.gimp.org. Accessed 8 August 2018

  31. Comber, O., Haselberger, D., Mayer, H., Hörbe, M., Unterweger, D.: Bouncy Fant Tutorial (2019). https://learn2programe.github.io/learn2proGrAME-Grundlagen/0280-bouncyfant/T00-introduction/. Accessed 4 April 2019

  32. BMBWF - Federal Ministry of Education Science and Research and OeAD - Austrian Agency for International Cooperation in Education and Research (2018). Sparkling Science - a programme of Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research. https://www.sparklingscience.at/en. 31 May 2019

  33. Mayring, P.: Die Praxis der Qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse. Beltz, Weinheim (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dougiamas, M.: Moodle - Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment. https://moodle.org/. 25 May 2019

  35. Gläser-Zikuda, M.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse in der Lernstrategie- und Lernemotionsforschung: na (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oswald Comber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Comber, O., Motschnig, R., Mayer, H. (2020). Chat-Interviews as a Means to Explore Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions on Developing Video Games with Unity in Computer Science Classes. In: Auer, M., Hortsch, H., Sethakul, P. (eds) The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education. ICL 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_88

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics