Skip to main content

Molecular Dynamics Performance Evaluation with Modern Computer Architecture

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms (NUMTA 2019)

Abstract

An important task of chemical biology is to discover the mechanism of recognition and binding between proteins. Despite the simplicity of the ligand-based model, fundamental mechanisms that regulate these interactions are poorly understood. An adequate equipment is mandatory to unravel this scientific challenge, not only through cost savings but also with high-quality results. With this in mind, we performed Molecular Dynamics simulations using the Gromacs package on two promising platforms: Cavium ThunderX2 ARM based cluster setup and shared-memory Intel based single-node machine. Aforementioned tests were also performed on common Intel based servers as a reference. Acquired results shown that shared-memory machine features the higest performance, although ARM and Intel clutsers are only slightly slower when more than four sockets are employed. During measurements, idle and job-execution consumptions were sampled in order to evaluate the energy required by a single simulation step. Results show that ARM and Intel servers are much less power-hungry with respect to shared-memory machine. The latter, on the other hand, features a decrement in power consumption when more resources are employed. Said unexpected behaviour is later discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Xiong, J.P.: Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin \(\alpha \)V\(\beta \)3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand. Science (2002). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiao, T.: Structural basis for allostery in integrins and binding to fibrinogen-mimetic therapeutics. Nature (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandyopadhyay, A., et al.: Defining the role of Integrin \(\alpha \nu \beta \)6 in Cancer. Curr. Drug Targ. (2009). https://doi.org/10.2174/138945009788680374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Munger, J.S.: A mechanism for regulating pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis: the integrin \(\alpha \nu \beta \)6 binds and activates latent TGF \(\beta \)1. Cell (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80545-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, M., et al.: Epigenetic regulation of integrin \(\beta \)6 transcription induced by TGF-\(\beta \)1 in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. J. Cell. Biochem. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.26642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan, M.R., et al.: Psoriasin (S100A7) associates with integrin \(\beta 6\) subunit and is required for \(\alpha \nu \beta 6\)-dependent carcinoma cell invasion. Oncogene (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong, X., et al.: Structural determinants of integrin \(\beta \)-subunit specificity for latent TGF-\(\beta \). Nat. Struct. Mol. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abraham, M.J.: GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1, 19–25 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. The GNU Compiler Collection Homepage. https://gcc.gnu.org/. Accessed 27 May 2019

  10. OpenMPI Homepage. https://www.open-mpi.org/. Accessed 27 May 2019

  11. FFTW Hoempage. http://www.fftw.org/. Accessed 27 May 2019

  12. Abil, E.A., et al.: Motional timescale predictions by molecular dynamics simulations: case study using proline and hydroxyproline sidechain dynamics. Proteins (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.24350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Allner, et al.: Magnesium ion-water coordination and exchange in biomolecular simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ct3000734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bussi, G., et al.: Canonical sampling through velocity-rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2408420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parrinello, M., Rahman, A.: Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. (1981). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Essman, U., et al.: A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470117i

  17. http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2019-rc1/reference-manual/algorithms/molecular-dynamics.html#the-leap-frog-integrator. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  18. Smith S., et al.: A performance analysis of the first generation of HPC-optimized arm processors. Concurr. Pract. Exp. Comput. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5110

  19. Paladino, A., et al.: High affinity vs. native fibronectin in the modulation of \(\alpha \nu \beta 3\) integrin conformational dynamics: insights from computational analyses and implications for molecular design. Plos CB (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005334

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Marchetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Breuza, E., Colombo, G., Gregori, D., Marchetti, F. (2020). Molecular Dynamics Performance Evaluation with Modern Computer Architecture. In: Sergeyev, Y., Kvasov, D. (eds) Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms. NUMTA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11974. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40616-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40616-5_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40615-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40616-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics