Abstract
This text is the result of a research process that has been carried out during the last five years on the realities and problems of plagiarism in contexts of higher education in different countries. We have observed eight groups of university students of different degrees in Engineering in a mandatory course of “Oral and written expression” in two universities in different countries (Ecuador and Spain). This course aims to provide tools to develop skills in oral and written presentations on academic assignments.
Through practical exercises, manuals and presentations, students develop different strategies to generate tools to expose their knowledge as a “way of doing”. The development of student tasks follows specific guidelines discussed with the use of technology to detect plagiarism, Turnitin and Urkund tools. The results of our research indicate how the average percentage of plagiarism in student work is reduced with the introduction of this software.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Breen, L., Maassen, M.: Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: the role of education. Issues Educ. Res. 15(1), 1–16 (2005)
Thomson Maddox, T.: Plagiarism and the community college. In: Roberts, T.S. (ed.) Student Plagiarism in an Online World. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2008)
Council of Writing Program Administrators: Defining and avoiding plagiarism: The Council of Writing Program Administrators’ Statement on Best Practices (2003). http://www.wpacouncil.org/node/
Whitley, B.: Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review. Res. High. Educ. 39(3), 235–274 (1998)
Martin, D., Rao, A., Sloan, L.: Ethnicity, acculturation, and plagiarism: a criterion study of unethical academic conduct. Hum. Organ. 70(1), 88–96 (2011)
Hannabuss, S.: Contexted texts: issues of plagiarism. Libr. Manag. 22(6/7), 311–318 (2001)
Chapman, K., Lupton, R.: Academic dishonesty in a global educational market: a comparison of Hong Kong and American university business students. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 18(6/7), 425–435 (2004)
Introna, L., Hayes, N., Blair, L., Wood, E.: Cultural attitudes towards plagiarism: developing a better understanding of the needs of students from diverse cultural backgrounds relating to issues of plagiarism (2003)
Salter, S., Guffey, D., McMillan, J.: Truth, consequences, and culture: a comparative examination of cheating and attitudes about cheating among United States and United Kingdom students. J. Bus. Ethics 31(1), 37–50 (2001)
Song-Turner, H.: Plagiarism: academic dishonesty or “blind spot” of multicultural education? Aust. Univ. Rev. 50(2), 39–50 (2008)
Wheeler, G.: Plagiarism in the Japanese universities: truly a cultural matter? J. Second Lang. Writ. 18, 17–29 (2009)
Sureda-Negre, J., Comas-Forgas, R., Oliver-Trobat, M.: Plagio académico entre alumnado de secundaria y bachillerato: diferencias en cuanto al género y la procrastinación. Comunicar 44, 1–13 (2015)
Comas, R., Sureda, J.: Academic plagiarism: explanatory factors from students’ perspective. J. Acad. Ethics 8(3), 217–232 (2010)
Garcés, P., Pavón, M., Pérez, E.: Técnicas de Expresión Oral y Escrita. Curso 2009/2010. Libro del Alumno. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid (2009)
Christodoulou, I.: The impact factor of plagiarism. Int. J. Health Sci. 1(4), 113–114 (2008)
Maurer, H., Kappe, F., Zaka, B.: Plagiarism - a survey. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 1, 1050–1084 (2006)
Zimmerman, T.A.: McLean students file suit against turnitin.com: useful tool or instrument of tyranny? In: The CCCC-IP Annual: Top Intellectual Property Developments of 2007. Intellectual Property Caucus of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, New York, pp. 2–11 (2008)
Batane, T.: Turning to turnitin to fight plagiarism among university students. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13(2), 1–12 (2010)
Kose, O., Arikan, A.: Reducing plagiarism by using online software: an experimental study. Contemp. Online Lang. Educ. J. 1, 122–129 (2011)
Mphahlele, A., McKenna, S.: The use of turnitin in the higher education sector: decoding the myth. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 44(7), 1079–1089 (2019)
Weber-Wulff, D.: Plagiarism detection software: promises, pitfalls, and practices. In: Handbook of Academic Integrity, pp. 625–638. Springer, Singapore (2016)
Wrigley, S.: Avoiding ‘de-plagiarism’: exploring the affordances of handwriting in the essay-writing process. Act. Learn. High. Educ. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735611
Weinstein, J., Dobkin, C.: Plagiarism in US higher education: estimating Internet plagiarism rates and testing a means deterrence (2002)
Martin, D.: Plagiarism and technology: a tool for coping with plagiarism. J. Educ. Bus. 80(3), 149–152 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Belli, S., Raventós, C.L., Guarda, T. (2020). Plagiarism Detection in the Classroom: Honesty and Trust Through the Urkund and Turnitin Software. In: Rocha, Á., Ferrás, C., Montenegro Marin, C., Medina García, V. (eds) Information Technology and Systems. ICITS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1137. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40690-5_63
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40690-5_63
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40689-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40690-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)