Abstract
Selection of competent employees is one of the numerous factors that determine the success of a project. The literature describes many approaches that help decision makers to recruit candidates with the required skills. Only a few of them take into account the disruptions that can occur during the implementation of a project, caused by employee absenteeism, fluctuations in the duration of activities, etc. Collectively, what these approaches amount to is proactive planning of employee teams with redundant competences. Searching for competence frameworks robust to disruptions involves time-consuming calculations, which do not guarantee that an admissible solution will be found. In view of this, in the present study, we propose sufficient conditions, the fulfilment of which guarantees the existence of such a solution. By testing these conditions, one can determine whether there exists an admissible solution, i.e. whether it is at all worth searching for a robust competence framework. The possibilities of practical application of the proposed method are illustrated with an example.
The work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, under research project no: 2019/33/N/HS4/00379.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antosz, K.: Maintenance – identification and analysis of the competency gap. Maint. Reliab. 20(3), 484–494 (2018)
Bocewicz, G., Wikarek, J., Sitek, P., Banaszak, Z.: Robust competence allocation for multi-project scheduling. In: Świątek, J., Borzemski, L., Wilimowska, Z. (eds.) ISAT 2019. AISC, vol. 1051, pp. 16–30. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30604-5_2
Davenport, A., Gefflot, C., Beck, C.: Slack-based techniques for robust schedules. In: Cesta, A., Borrajo, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Planning, pp. 43–49 (2001)
Dück, V., Ionescu, L., Kliewer, N., Suhl, L.: Increasing stability of crew and aircraft schedules. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 20(1), 47–61 (2012)
Easton, F., Rossin, D.: Overtime schedules for full-time service workers. Omega 25(3), 285–299 (1997)
Ehrgott, M., Ryan, D.M.: Constructing robust crew schedules with bicriteria optimization. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 11(3), 139–150 (2003)
Fapohunda, T.M.: Towards effective team building in the workplace. Int. J. Educ. Res. 1(4), 1–12 (2013)
Hazir, O., Haouari, M., Erel, E.: Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(2), 633–643 (2010)
Ingels, J., Maenhout, B.: Employee substitutability as a tool to improve the robustness in personnel scheduling. OR Spectrum 37(3), 623–658 (2017)
Ingels, J., Maenhout, B.: The impact of overtime as a time-based proactive scheduling and reactive allocation strategy on the robustness of a personnel shift roster. J. Sched. 21(2), 143–165 (2018)
Ingels, J., Maenhout, B.: The impact of reserve duties on the robustness of a personnel shift roster: an empirical investigation. Comput. Oper. Res. 61, 153–169 (2015)
Ionescu, L., Kliewer, N.: Increasing flexibility of airline crew schedules. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 20(3), 1019–1028 (2011)
Moudani, W., Mora-Camino, F.: Solving crew reserve in airlines using dynamic programming approach. Int. J. Optim. Theory Methods Appl. 2(4), 302–329 (2010)
Nielsen, P., Jiang, L., Rytter, N.G.M., Chen, G.: An investigation of forecast horizon and observation fit’s influence on an econometric rate forecast model in the liner shipping industry. Marit. Policy Manag. 41(7), 667–682 (2014)
Shebalov, J., Klabjan, D.: Robust airline crew pairing: move-up crews. Transp. Sci. 40, 300–312 (2006)
Sitek, P., Wikarek, J.: A multi-level approach to ubiquitous modeling and solving constraints in combinatorial optimization problems in production and distribution. Appl. Intell. 48, 1344–1367 (2018)
Smith III, H.H., Smarkusky, D.: Competency matrices for peer assessment of individuals in team projects. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Information Technology Education, SIGITE 2005, 20–22 October 2005, Newark, NJ, USA (2005)
Sobaszek, Ł., Gola, A., Kozłowski, E.: Application of survival function in robust scheduling of production jobs. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, M., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FEDCSIS), pp. 575–578. IEEE, New York (2017)
Szwarc, E., Bocewicz, G., Bach-Dąbrowska, I.: Planning of teacher staff competence structure robust to unexpected personnel absence. In: Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control (MIM), Berlin (2019, in print)
Szwarc, E., Bocewicz, G., Bach-Dąbrowska, I., Banaszak, Z.: Declarative model of competences assessment robust to personnel absence. In: Damaševičius, R., Vasiljevienė, G. (eds.) ICIST 2019. CCIS, vol. 1078, pp. 12–23. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30275-7_2
Szwarc, E., Bocewicz, G., Banaszak, Z., Wikarek, J.: Competence allocation planning robust to unexpected staff absenteeism. Maint. Reliab. 21(3), 440–450 (2019)
Tam, B., Ehrgott, M., Ryan, D.M., Zakeri, G.: A comparison of stochastic programming and bi-objective optimisation approaches to robust airline crew scheduling. OR Spectrum 33(1), 49–75 (2011)
Vieira, G.E., Herrmann, J.W., Lin, E.: Rescheduling manufacturing systems: a framework of strategies, policies and methods. J. Sched. 6(1), 35–58 (2003)
Whiddett, S., Hollyforde, S.: The Competency Handbook. Institute of Personnel and Development, London (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Szwarc, E., Nielsen, I., Smutnicki, C., Bocewicz, G. (2020). Competence-Oriented Recruitment of a Project Team Robust to Disruptions. In: Nguyen, N., Jearanaitanakij, K., Selamat, A., Trawiński, B., Chittayasothorn, S. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42058-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42058-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42057-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42058-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)