Skip to main content

Competence-Oriented Recruitment of a Project Team Robust to Disruptions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2020)

Abstract

Selection of competent employees is one of the numerous factors that determine the success of a project. The literature describes many approaches that help decision makers to recruit candidates with the required skills. Only a few of them take into account the disruptions that can occur during the implementation of a project, caused by employee absenteeism, fluctuations in the duration of activities, etc. Collectively, what these approaches amount to is proactive planning of employee teams with redundant competences. Searching for competence frameworks robust to disruptions involves time-consuming calculations, which do not guarantee that an admissible solution will be found. In view of this, in the present study, we propose sufficient conditions, the fulfilment of which guarantees the existence of such a solution. By testing these conditions, one can determine whether there exists an admissible solution, i.e. whether it is at all worth searching for a robust competence framework. The possibilities of practical application of the proposed method are illustrated with an example.

The work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, under research project no: 2019/33/N/HS4/00379.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Antosz, K.: Maintenance – identification and analysis of the competency gap. Maint. Reliab. 20(3), 484–494 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bocewicz, G., Wikarek, J., Sitek, P., Banaszak, Z.: Robust competence allocation for multi-project scheduling. In: Świątek, J., Borzemski, L., Wilimowska, Z. (eds.) ISAT 2019. AISC, vol. 1051, pp. 16–30. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30604-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Davenport, A., Gefflot, C., Beck, C.: Slack-based techniques for robust schedules. In: Cesta, A., Borrajo, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Planning, pp. 43–49 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dück, V., Ionescu, L., Kliewer, N., Suhl, L.: Increasing stability of crew and aircraft schedules. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 20(1), 47–61 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Easton, F., Rossin, D.: Overtime schedules for full-time service workers. Omega 25(3), 285–299 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ehrgott, M., Ryan, D.M.: Constructing robust crew schedules with bicriteria optimization. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 11(3), 139–150 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fapohunda, T.M.: Towards effective team building in the workplace. Int. J. Educ. Res. 1(4), 1–12 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hazir, O., Haouari, M., Erel, E.: Robust scheduling and robustness measures for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(2), 633–643 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ingels, J., Maenhout, B.: Employee substitutability as a tool to improve the robustness in personnel scheduling. OR Spectrum 37(3), 623–658 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ingels, J., Maenhout, B.: The impact of overtime as a time-based proactive scheduling and reactive allocation strategy on the robustness of a personnel shift roster. J. Sched. 21(2), 143–165 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingels, J., Maenhout, B.: The impact of reserve duties on the robustness of a personnel shift roster: an empirical investigation. Comput. Oper. Res. 61, 153–169 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ionescu, L., Kliewer, N.: Increasing flexibility of airline crew schedules. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 20(3), 1019–1028 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moudani, W., Mora-Camino, F.: Solving crew reserve in airlines using dynamic programming approach. Int. J. Optim. Theory Methods Appl. 2(4), 302–329 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen, P., Jiang, L., Rytter, N.G.M., Chen, G.: An investigation of forecast horizon and observation fit’s influence on an econometric rate forecast model in the liner shipping industry. Marit. Policy Manag. 41(7), 667–682 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shebalov, J., Klabjan, D.: Robust airline crew pairing: move-up crews. Transp. Sci. 40, 300–312 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sitek, P., Wikarek, J.: A multi-level approach to ubiquitous modeling and solving constraints in combinatorial optimization problems in production and distribution. Appl. Intell. 48, 1344–1367 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith III, H.H., Smarkusky, D.: Competency matrices for peer assessment of individuals in team projects. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Information Technology Education, SIGITE 2005, 20–22 October 2005, Newark, NJ, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sobaszek, Ł., Gola, A., Kozłowski, E.: Application of survival function in robust scheduling of production jobs. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, M., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FEDCSIS), pp. 575–578. IEEE, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szwarc, E., Bocewicz, G., Bach-Dąbrowska, I.: Planning of teacher staff competence structure robust to unexpected personnel absence. In: Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control (MIM), Berlin (2019, in print)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Szwarc, E., Bocewicz, G., Bach-Dąbrowska, I., Banaszak, Z.: Declarative model of competences assessment robust to personnel absence. In: Damaševičius, R., Vasiljevienė, G. (eds.) ICIST 2019. CCIS, vol. 1078, pp. 12–23. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30275-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Szwarc, E., Bocewicz, G., Banaszak, Z., Wikarek, J.: Competence allocation planning robust to unexpected staff absenteeism. Maint. Reliab. 21(3), 440–450 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tam, B., Ehrgott, M., Ryan, D.M., Zakeri, G.: A comparison of stochastic programming and bi-objective optimisation approaches to robust airline crew scheduling. OR Spectrum 33(1), 49–75 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Vieira, G.E., Herrmann, J.W., Lin, E.: Rescheduling manufacturing systems: a framework of strategies, policies and methods. J. Sched. 6(1), 35–58 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Whiddett, S., Hollyforde, S.: The Competency Handbook. Institute of Personnel and Development, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eryk Szwarc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Szwarc, E., Nielsen, I., Smutnicki, C., Bocewicz, G. (2020). Competence-Oriented Recruitment of a Project Team Robust to Disruptions. In: Nguyen, N., Jearanaitanakij, K., Selamat, A., Trawiński, B., Chittayasothorn, S. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42058-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42058-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42057-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42058-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics