Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Predictive Models for Maintenance Optimization: An Analytical Literature Survey of Industrial Maintenance Strategies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology for Management: Current Research and Future Directions (AITM 2019, ISM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 380))

Abstract

As machine learning (ML) techniques and sensor technology continue to gain importance, the data-driven perspective has become a relevant approach for improving the quality of maintenance for machines and processes in industrial environments. Our study provides an analytical literature review of existing industrial maintenance strategies showing first that, among all extant approaches to maintenance, each varying in terms of efficiency and complexity, predictive maintenance best fits the needs of a highly competitive industry setup. Predictive maintenance is an approach that allows maintenance actions to be based on changes in the monitored parameters of the assets by using a variety of techniques to study both live and historical information to learn prognostic data and make accurate predictions. Moreover, we argue that, in any industrial setup, the quality of maintenance improves when the applied data-driven techniques and methods (i) have economic justifications and (ii) take into consideration the conformity with the industry standards. Next, we consider ML to be a prediction methodology, and we show that multimodal ML methods enhance industrial maintenance with a critical component of intelligence: prediction. Based on the surveyed literature, we introduce taxonomies that cover relevant predictive models and their corresponding data-driven maintenance techniques. Moreover, we investigate the potential of multimodality for maintenance optimization, particularly the model-agnostic data fusion methods. We show the progress made in the literature toward the formalization of multimodal data fusion for industrial maintenance.

This work was partly supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) for the Platona-M project under the grant number 01MT19005D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Susto, G.A., Mcloone, S., Pampuri, S., Benghi, A., Schirru, A.: Machine learning for predictive maintenance: a multiple classifier approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat. 11(3), 812–820 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2349359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, Z., Norbert, M., Nezih, M.: The role of Data Fusion in predictive maintenance using Digital Twin. AIP Conf. Proc. 1949(1), 020023 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manco, G., et al.: Fault detection and explanation through big data analysis on sensor streams. Expert Syst. Appl. 87, 141–156 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Niu, G., Li, H.: IETM centered intelligent maintenance system integrating fuzzy semantic inference and data fusion. Microelectron. Reliab. 75, 197–204 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2017.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo, L., Li, N., Jia, F., Lei, Y., Lin, J.: A recurrent neural network-based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing 240, 98–109 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Acorsi, R., Manzini, R., Pascarella, P., Patella, M., Sassi, S.: Data Mining and Machine Learning for Condition-based Maintenance. In: (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing FAIM, 27–30 June 2017, Modena, Italy, pp. 1153-1161 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Safizadeh, M., Latifi, S.: Using multisensory data fusion for vibration fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings by accelerometer and load cell. Inf. Fusion 18(1), 1–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt, B., Sandberg, U., Wang, U.: Next generation condition based Predictive Maintenance. Methods 13306, 4–11 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schenk, M.: Instandhaltung technischer Systeme. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03949-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Otto, B., et al.: Industrial Data Space – Digital soveregnity over data, In: Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Diez-Olivan, A., del Ser, J., Galar, D., Sierra, B.: Data fusion and machine learning for industrial prognosis: Trends and perspectives towards Industry 40. Information Fusion 50, 92–111 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DIN EN-13306. DIN Standards – Maintenance terminology, Beuth Publishing DIN (2018). https://dx.doi.org/10.31030/2641990

  13. DIN EN-31051. DIN Standards – Fundamentals of maintenance, Beuth Publishing DIN (2019). https://dx.doi.org/10.31030/3048531

  14. Baltrusaitis, T., Ahuja, C., Morency, L.: Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 41(2), 423–443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2798607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alpaydin, E.: Classifying multimodal data. In: Oviatt, S., Schuller, B., Cohen, P.R., Sonntag, D., Potamianos, G., Krüger, A. (eds.) The Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces, In Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan & Claypool, NY, pp. 49–69 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noman, N.A., Nasr, E.S.A., AlShayea, A., Kaid, H.: Overview of predictive condition based maintenance research using bibliometric indicators. J. K. Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 31(4), 355–367 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oates, B.J.: Researching Information Systems and Computing. Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bunks, C., McCarthy, D., Al-Ani, T.: Condition-based Maintenance of machines using hidden Markov Models. Mech. Syst. Sign. Process. 14(4), 597–612 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2000.1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deuszkiewick, P., Radkowski, S.: On-line condition monitoring of a power transmission unit of a rail vehicle. Mech. Syst. Sign. Process. 17(6), 1321–1334 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2002.1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hao, Y., Sun, J., Yang, G., Bai, J.: The application of support vector machines to gas turbines performance diagnosis. Chinese J. Aeronaut. 18(1), 15–19 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60276-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baraldi, P., Zio, E., di Maio, F.: Unsupervised clustering for fault diagnostics in nuclear power plants components. Int. J. Comp. Intell. Syst. 6(4), 764–777 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2013.804145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Merkt, O.: On the Use of Predictive Models for Improving the Quality of Industrial Maintenance: an Analytical Literature Review of Maintenance Strategies. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2019 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems FedCSIS, 1–4 September, pp. 693-704. Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany (2019). https://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2019F101

  24. Alexandru, A.: Using Expert Systems for Fault Detection and Diagnosis. Industrial Applications (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krishnakumari, A., Elayaperumal, A., Saravanan, M., Arvindan, C.: Fault diagnostics of spur gear using decision tree and fuzzy classifier. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 89(9–12), 3487–3494 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9307-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaramillo, V.H., Ottewill, J.R., Dudek, R., Lepiarczyk, D., Pawlik, P.: Condition monitoring of distributed systems using two-stage Bayesian inference data fusion. Mech. Syst. Sign. Process. 87, 91–110 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, C., Li, Y., Zhou, G., Shen, W.: A sensor fusion and support vector machine-based approach for recognition of complex machining conditions. J. Intell. Manuf. 29(8), 1739–1752 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1209-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Diez, A., Khoa, N.L.D., Alamdari, M.M., Wang, Y., Chen, F., Runcie, P.: A clustering approach for structural health monitoring on bridges. J. Civil Struct. Health Monit. 6(3), 429–445 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, C., Sánchez, R.-V., Zurita, G., Cerrada, M., Cabrera, D.: Fault diagnosis for rotating machinery using vibration measurement deep statistical feature learning. Sensors 16(6), 895, 1–19 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Widmer, T., Klein, A., Wachter, P., Meyl, S.: Predicting Material Requirements in the Automotive Industry Using Data Mining. In: Abramowicz, W., Corchuelo, R. (eds.) BIS 2019. LNBIP, vol. 354, pp. 147–161. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20482-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Mosallam, A., Medjaher, K., Zerhouni, N.: Data-driven prognostic method based on Bayesian approaches for direct remaining useful life prediction. J. Intell. Manuf. 27(5), 1037–1048 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0933-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Alsina, E.F., Chica, M., Trawinski, K., Regattieri, A.: On the use of Machine Learning methods to predict component reliability from data-driven industrial case studies. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 94(5–8), 2419–2433 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1039-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cristaldi, L., Leone, G., Ottoboni, R., Subbiah, S., Turrin, S.: A comparative study on data-driven prognostic approaches using fleet knowledge. In: Arpaia, A., Catelani, M., Cristaldi, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology (I2MTC), 23–26 May, 2016, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1-6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2016.7520371

  34. Liu, Q. (C.), Wang, H.P. (B.): A case study on multisensory data fusion for imbalanced diagnosis of rotating machinery. AI EDAM 15(3), 203–2010 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xenakis, A., Karageorgos, A., Lallas, E., Chis, A.E., Gonzalez-Velez, H.: Towards distributed IoT/cloud based fault detection and maintenance in industrial automation. In: Shakshuki, M.E., Yasar, A.-U.-H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT 2019), April 29 - May 2, 2019, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 683–690 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sobaszek, Ł., Gola, A., Kozłowski, E.: Application of survival function in robust scheduling of production jobs. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information systems FedCSIS, 3–6 September 2017, pp. 575-578. Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2017F276

  37. Sobaszek, Ł., Gola, A., Kozłowski, E.: Job-shop scheduling with machine breakdown prediction under completion time constraint. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems FedCSIS, 9–12 September 2018, pp. 437-440. Adam Mickiewicz university Poznan, Poland (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2018F83

  38. Khaleghi, B., Karray, F., Khamis, A., Razavi, S.N.: Multisensor data fusion: a review of the state-of-the-art. Inf. Fusion 14, 28–44 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2011.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Vincent, P.: Representation learning: a review and new perspectives, Technical report. Univ. Montreal, 35(8), 1798–1828 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Baban, C.F., Baban, M., Suteu, M.D.: Using a fuzzy logic approach for the predictive maintenance of textile machines. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 30(2), 999–1006 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-151822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cui, W., Lu, Z., Li, C., Han, X.: A proactive approach to solve integrated production scheduling and maintenance planning problem in flow shops. Comput. Ind. Eng. 115, 342–353 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Seidgar, H., Zandieh, M., Mahdavi, I.: An efficient metaheuristic algorithm for scheduling a two-stage assembly flow shop problem with preventive maintenance activities and reliability approach. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 26(1), 16–41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2017.083180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chou, C.-A., Jin, X., Müller, A., Ostadabbas, S.: MMDF 2018 Multimodal Data Fusion Workshop Report. Northeastern University, Boston (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hohenheim University, Schloss Hohenheim 1, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany

    Oana Merkt

Authors
  1. Oana Merkt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oana Merkt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice, Poland

    Ewa Ziemba

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Merkt, O. (2020). Predictive Models for Maintenance Optimization: An Analytical Literature Survey of Industrial Maintenance Strategies. In: Ziemba, E. (eds) Information Technology for Management: Current Research and Future Directions. AITM ISM 2019 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 380. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43353-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43353-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43352-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43353-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics