Abstract
While typical constructions of explicit expanders work for certain sizes (i.e., number of vertices), one can obtain constructions of about the same complexity by manipulating the original expanders. One way of doing so is detailed and analyzed below.
For any \(m\in [0.5n,n]\) (equiv., \(n\in [m,2m]\)), given an m-vertex expander, \(G_m\), we construct an n-vertex expander by connecting each of the first \(n-m\) vertices of \(G_m\) to an (otherwise isolated) new vertex, and adding edges arbitrarily to regain regularity. Our analysis of this construction uses the combinatorial definition of expansion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
Assume that the graph is (0.5, c)-expanding, and let \(S\subset V\) be an arbitrary set such that \(0.5\cdot |V|<|S|\le \rho \cdot |V|\). Then, \(R{\mathop {=}\limits ^\mathrm{def}}V\setminus (S\cup {\partial }(S))\) has cardinality smaller than \(0.5\cdot |V|\), and it follows that \(|{\partial }(R)|\ge c\cdot |R|\). On the other hand, \({\partial }(R) \subseteq {\partial }(S)\), and so \(|{\partial }(S)|\ge c\cdot |R|= c\cdot (|V|-|S|-|{\partial }(S)|)\). Hence, \(|{\partial }(S)|\ge \frac{c}{1+c}\cdot (|V|-|S|) \ge \frac{c}{1+c}\cdot \frac{1-\rho }{\rho }\cdot |S|\), and it follows that the graph is \((\rho ,c')\)-expanding for \(c'=\frac{c\cdot (1-\rho )}{(1+c)\cdot \rho }\). .
- 4.
We first infer that \(G_m\) is \((0.75,c')\)-expanding for \(c'=\frac{0.25\cdot c}{0.75\cdot (1+c)}\) (see Footnote 3). Hence, \(G_n\) is \((0.5,c'')\)-expanding for \(c''=\frac{c}{6(1+c)}\). Using \(c\le 1\), we get \(c''\ge {c}/{12}\).
- 5.
Suppose that \(i\in [m]\cap S\) and \(m+i\in [n]\setminus S\), and let \(T=(S\setminus \{i\})\cup \{m+i\}\). Then, \(i\not \in {\partial }(S)\) and \(m+i\in {\partial }(S)\), whereas \(i\in {\partial }(T)\) and \(m+i\not \in {\partial }(T)\), which means that \(|{\partial }(T)\cap \{i,m+i\}|=1=|{\partial }(S)\cap \{i,m+i\}|\). However, \({\partial }(T)\setminus \{i,m+i\}\subseteq {\partial }(S)\setminus \{i,m+i\}\), since the move may only eliminate a contribution of i to \({\partial }(S)\setminus \{i,m+i\}\) (whereas \(m+i\) does not contribute to \({\partial }(T)\setminus \{i,m+i\}\)).
References
Alon, N.: Explicit expanders of every degree and size. In: Preparation (2019). (Added in revision: See https://m.tau.ac.il/~nogaa/PDFS/expexp.pdf)
Goldreich, O.: Computational Complexity: A Conceptual Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Hoory, S., Linial, N., Wigderson, A.: Expander graphs and their applications. Bull. (New Series) Am. Math. Soc. 43(4), 439–561 (2006)
Murtagh, J., Reingold, O., Sidford, A., Vadhan, S.: Deterministic approximation of random walks in small space. In: 23rd RANDOM, LIPIcs 145, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goldreich, O. (2020). On Constructing Expanders for Any Number of Vertices. In: Goldreich, O. (eds) Computational Complexity and Property Testing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12050. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43662-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43662-9_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43661-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43662-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)