Skip to main content

Greybox Fuzzing Based on Ant Colony Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1151))

  • 2248 Accesses

Abstract

Greybox fuzzing technology is a kind of fuzzing technology that is commonly used now and effective. This fuzzing technology can guide the direction of fuzzing by acquiring the execution information of some paths in the program. However, the gray box fuzzy testing technology commonly used in the market today evaluates the seed of a sample by its path depth, execution time, and whether there is a new path to judge the quality of a sample, which is often not comprehensive. This article will propose a sample seed screening technology that uses ant colony algorithm to control gray box fuzzy test. By estimating the transition probability between the basic block and the basic block, we can determine what kind of seed sample is more likely to mutate into a new sample file. Based on this, the order and degree of fuzzing of the samples are determined, so as to improve the efficiency of fuzzing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Böhme, M., Pham, V.-T., Roychoudhury, A.: Coverage-based greybox fuzzing as markov chain. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pp. 1032–1043 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Böhme, M., Paul, S.: A probabilistic analysis of the efficiency of automated software testing. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 42(4), 345–360 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Serebryany, K., Bruening, D., Potapenko, A., Vyukov, D.: Addresssanitizer: a fast address sanity checker. In: Proceedings of the 2012 USENIX Conference on Annual Technical Conference, Series USENIX ATC 2012, p. 28 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pham, V.-T., Böhme, M., Roychoudhury, A.: Model-based whitebox fuzzing for program binaries. In: Proceedings of the 31st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Series ASE, pp. 552–562 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Y., Su, T., Sun, C., Su, Z., Zhao, J.: Coverage-directed differential testing of JVM implementations. In: PLDI 2016, pp. 85–99 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sparks, S., Embleton, S., Cunningham, R., Zou, C.: Automated vulnerability analysis: leveraging control flow for evolutionary input crafting. In: 23d Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC), pp. 477–486 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Website: Symbolic execution in vulnerability research. https://lcamtuf.blogspot.sg/2015/02/symbolic-execution-in-vuln-research.html. Accessed: 13 June 2017

  8. Website: AFL vulnerability trophy case. http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/#bugs. Accessed 13 June 2017

  9. Website: Peach fuzzer platform. http://www.peachfuzzer.com/products/peach-platform/. Accessed 13 June 2017

  10. Chen, C., Cui, B., Ma, J., et al.: A systematic review of fuzzing techniques. Comput. Secur. 75, 118–137 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Takanen, A., Demott, J.D., Miller, C., et al.: Fuzzing for Software Security Testing and Quality Assurance. Artech House, Norwood (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Takanen, A.: Fuzzing: the past, the present and the future. In: Actes du 7ème symposium sur la sécurité des technologies de l’information et des communications (SSTIC), pp. 202–212 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pham, V.T., Böhme, M., Roychoudhury, A.: Model-based whitebox fuzzing for program binaries. In: 2016 31st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), pp. 543–553. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schieferdecker, I., Großmann, J., Schneider, M.: Model-based fuzzing for security testing. In: Keynote Talk at the 3rd International Workshop on Security Testing (SECTEST 2012), Montreal, Canada, April 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Website: AFL technical details. http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/technical_details.txt. Accessed 13 June 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bowen Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sun, B., Wang, B., Cui, B., Fu, Y. (2020). Greybox Fuzzing Based on Ant Colony Algorithm. In: Barolli, L., Amato, F., Moscato, F., Enokido, T., Takizawa, M. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1151. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44041-1_112

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics