Skip to main content

Narrative Knowledge Representation and Blockchain: A Symbiotic Relationship

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1151))

Abstract

Notwithstanding that the Semantic Web improves the information interoperability, however, the spatio-temporal knowledge representation, the description of relatively complex events – like those that can involve within smart contracts – security, reliability and trust are still difficult to achieve. In addition, Blockchain technology promotes information sharing and is supplying secure communication architecture for distributed systems. Therefore, intertwine an ontology language with Blockchain allows information interoperability and provides message-integrity checking and resolve the trust in all kinds of applications (IoT, robotic, industry 4.0, health record, etc.). In fact, ontologies facilitate the understanding and sharing of intrinsic components –smart contracts, transaction, knowledge- and relationship within a Blockchain. The main goal of this approach is to promote common data exchange, the design of decentralized, and the chronological semantic relationships on the Blockchain and Ethereum Smart Contracts making use of the narrative semantic representation foundations allowing therefore the web to survive and Blockchain technology to prosper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/v0.5.11/.

References

  1. Sambra, A.V., Mansour, E., Hawke, S., Zereba, M., Greco, N., Ghanem, A., Zagidulin, D., Aboulnaga, A., Berners-Lee, T.: Solid: a platform for decentralized social applications based on linked data. Technical report (2016). https://solid.mit.edu/

  2. Zikratov, I.A., Lebedev, I.S., Gurtov, A.V., Kuzmich, E.V.: Securing swarm intellect robots with a police office model. In IEEE 8th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT), pp. 1–5 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Millard, A.G., Timmis, J., Alan, F.T.: Towards exogenous fault detection in swarm robotic systems, pp. 429–430 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baral, C., De Giacomo, G.: Knowledge representation and reasoning: what’s hot. In: AAAI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Panarello, A., Tapas, N., Merlino, G., Longo, F., Puliafito, A.: Blockchain and IoT integration: a systematic survey. Sensors 18, 2575 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, D.: Blockchain and the internet of things in the industrial sector. IT Prof. 20(3), 15–18 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Casado-Vara, R., González-Briones, A., Prieto, J., Corchado, J.M.: Smart contract for monitoring and control of logistics activities: pharmaceutical utilities case study. In: SOCO, pp. 509–517. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrer, E.C., Rudovic, O., Hardjono, T., Pentland, A.: RoboChain: a secure data-sharing framework for human-robot interaction. CoRR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christidis, K., Devetsikiotis, M.: Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. In: IEEE Access, Special section on the plethora of Research in IoT (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hackius, N., Petersen, M.: Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: trick or treat? In: Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zarri, G.P.: NKRL a knowledge representation language for narrative natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 1032–1035 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fensel, D.: Ontologies. In: Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce, pp. 11–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guarino, G.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: Proceedings of FOIS (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reijers, W., Coeckelbergh, M.: The blockchain as a narrative technology: investigating the social ontology and normative configurations of cryptocurrencies. Philos. Technol. 31, 103–130 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, H.M., Laskowski, M., Nan, N.: A first step in the co-evolution of blockchain and ontologies: towards engineering an ontology of governance at the blockchain protocol level. SSRN Electron. J. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. English, M., Auer, S., Domingue, J.: Blockchain technologies and the semantic web: a framework for symbiotic development. Technical report, University of Bonn (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ugarte, H.: A more pragmatic Web 3.0: linked blockchain data. Technical report, Bonn, Germany (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Kruijff, J., Weigand, H.: Understanding the blockchain using enterprise ontology. In: CAiSE Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 29–43 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. McCarthy, W.E.: The REA accounting model: a generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Account. Rev. 57, 554–578 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., Zorgios, Y.: The enterprise ontology. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 13(1), 31–89 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Teslay, N., Smirnov, A.: Blockchain-based framework for ontology-oriented robots’ coalition formation in cyberphysical systems, In: MATEC Web Conference, vol. 161 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kwon, J., Buchman, E.: Whitepaper - cosmos: a network of distributed ledgers, cosmos-network (2017). https://cosmos.network/about/whitepaper)

  23. Tasca, P., Tessone, C.: Taxonomy of blockchain technologies. Principles of Identification and Classification (2018). at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2977811

  24. Henry, M.K., Laskowski, M..: Towards an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply chain provenance. In: Intelligent Systems Accounting, Finance, and Management. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gavin, W.: Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. (2014). http://gavwood.com/Paper.pdf

  26. Davidson, D.: Causal relations. J. Philos. 64(21), 691–703 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Welty, C., Fikes, R.: A reusable ontology for fluents in OWL. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intellignece and Applications, vol. 150 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pustejovsky, J., Castaño, J.M., Ingria, R., Sauri, R., Gaizauskas, R.J., Setzer, A., Katz, G., Radev, D.R.: TimeML : robust specification of event and temporal expressions in text. New Dir. Quest. Answ. 3, 28–34 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Riboni, D., Baldauf, C.M., Dustdar, S., Rosenberg, F.: OWL 2 modeling and reasoning with complex human activities. J. Pervasive Mob. 7, 379–395 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tao, J., Evren, S., Bao, J., McGuinness, D.L.: Integrity constraints in OWL. In: AAAI (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Clack, C.D., Bakshi, V.A., Braine, L.: Smart contract templates: foundations, design landscape and research directions. In: CoRR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyazid Sabri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sabri, L., Boubetra, A. (2020). Narrative Knowledge Representation and Blockchain: A Symbiotic Relationship. In: Barolli, L., Amato, F., Moscato, F., Enokido, T., Takizawa, M. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1151. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44041-1_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics