Abstract
In participatory design, non-professional designers are also involved in the design process. Creativity and motivation play an important role, and non-professionals in particular can have problems of motivation or ability. Persuasive technologies can be used to positively influence participants’ behavior. Applying a design science research approach, this study developed four persuasive technology artifacts to support workshop participants, based on existing work on participatory design, persuasive technologies, and creativity support tools. The following prototypes were implemented: (1) tablet-based support; (2) Bluetooth beacons for location-based triggers; (3) QR codes for additional information; and (4) a humanoid robot assistant. Each prototype incorporates persuasive strategies to exert a positive influence on workshop participants’ behavior by enhancing motivation and ability and initiating triggers. In the absence of any previous concrete implementations of persuasive technologies for participatory design, the described artifacts extend the existing knowledge base by proposing in-person collaboration as a novel application field for persuasive technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Piller, F.T., Schubert, P., Koch, M., Möslein, K.M.: Overcoming mass confusion: collaborative customer co-design in online communities. J. Comput. Commun. 10(4) (2005)
Antikainen, M., Mäkipää, M., Ahonen, M.: Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 13(1), 100–119 (2010)
Shneiderman, B.: Creativity support tools: a grand challenge for HCI researchers. In: Redondo, M., Bravo, C., Ortega, M. (eds.) Engineering the User Interface, pp. 1–9. Springer, London (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-136-7_1
Von Hippel, E.: Democratizing Innovation. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P.-A.: Participatory design and “democratizing innovation”. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference PDC 2010, pp. 41–50 (2010)
Piller, F.T., Ihl, C., Vossen, A.: A typology of customer co-creation in the innovation process. SSRN Electron. J. 10 (2010)
Mustak, M., Jaakkola, E., Halinen, A.: Customer participation and value creation: a systematic review and research implications. Manag. Serv. Qual. 23(4), 341–359 (2013)
Kensing, F., Blomberg, J.: Participatory design: issues and concerns. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 7, 167–185 (1998)
Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4(1), 5–18 (2008)
Adler, P.S., Chen, C.X.: Combining creativity and control: understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Acc. Organ. Soc. 36(2), 63–85 (2011)
Battistella, C., Nonino, F.: Open innovation web-based platforms: the impact of different forms of motivation on collaboration. Innov. Manag. Policy Pract. 14(4), 557–575 (2012)
Sanders, E.B.-N., Brandt, E., Binder, T.: A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference on PDC 2010, pp. 195–198. ACM Press, New York (2010)
Jarvela, S., Jarvenoja, H.: Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teach. Coll. Rec. 113(2), 350–374 (2011)
Algashami, A., Shahri, A., McAlaney, J., Taylor, J., Phalp, K., Ali, R.: Strategies and design principles to minimize negative side-effects of digital motivation on teamwork. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 267–278. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_21
Frich, J., MacDonald Vermeulen, L., Remy, C., Biskjaer, M.M., Dalsgaard, P.: Mapping the landscape of creativity support tools in HCI. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2019, Glasgow, pp. 1–18 (2019)
Gabriel, A., Monticolo, D., Camargo, M., Bourgault, M.: Creativity support systems: a systematic mapping study. Think. Ski. Creat. 21, 109–122 (2016)
Fogg, B.: Persuasive computers. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 1998, pp. 225–232 (1998)
Fogg, B.: A behavior model for persuasive design. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive 2009 (2009)
Torning, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasive system design: state of the art and future directions. In: Proceedings 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive 2009 (2009)
Stibe, A., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Designing persuasive systems for user engagement in collaborative interaction. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2014, pp. 1–17 (2014)
Stibe, A., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Lehto, T.: Exploring social influence on customer engagement: a pilot study on the effects of social learning, social comparison, and normative influence. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2735–2744 (2013)
de Vreede, T., Nguyen, C., de Vreede, G.-J., Boughzala, I., Oh, O., Reiter-Palmon, R.: A theoretical model of user engagement in crowdsourcing. In: Antunes, P., Gerosa, M.A., Sylvester, A., Vassileva, J., de Vreede, G.-J. (eds.) CRIWG 2013. LNCS, vol. 8224, pp. 94–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41347-6_8
Brereton, M., Buur, J.: New challenges for design participation in the era of ubiquitous computing. CoDesign 4(2), 101–113 (2008)
Jalowski, M., Fritzsche, A., Möslein, K.M.: Applications for persuasive technologies in participatory design processes. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Win, K.T., Karapanos, E., Karppinen, P., Kyza, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2019. LNCS, vol. 11433, pp. 74–86. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17287-9_7
Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G., Iversen, O.S.: In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 74, 93–106 (2015)
Halskov, K., Hansen, N.B.: The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 74, 81–92 (2015)
Sanders, E.B.-N.: From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Design and the Social Sciences, pp. 1–8. CRC Press, New York (2002)
Lee, Y.: Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign 4(1), 31–50 (2008)
Muller, M.: Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J.A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 1061–1081. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (2007)
Sanders, E.B.-N.: Perspectives on participation in design. In: Mareis, C., Held, M., Joost, G. (eds.) Wer Gestaltet die Gestaltung? Praxis, Theorie und Geschichte des Partizipatorischen Designs, pp. 65–78. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld (2013)
Greene, S.L.: Characteristics of applications that support creativity. Commun. ACM 45(10), 100–104 (2002)
Shneiderman, B., et al.: Creativity support tools: report from a U.S. national science foundation sponsored workshop. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 20(2), 61–77 (2006)
Shneiderman, B.: Creativity support tools accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun. ACM 50(12), 20–32 (2007)
Frich, J., Mose Biskjaer, M., Dalsgaard, P.: Twenty years of creativity research in human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018, DIS 2018, pp. 1235–1257 (2018)
Hartmann, B., Ringel Morris, M., Benko, H., Wilson, A.D.: Pictionaire - supporting collaborative design work by integrating physical and digital artifacts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 421–424 (2010)
De Rooij, A., Corr, P.J., Jones, S.: Creativity and emotion: enhancing creative thinking by the manipulation of computational feedback to determine emotional. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (2017)
Thomas, J.C., Lee, A., Danis, C.: Enhancing creative design via software tools. Commun. ACM 45(10), 112–115 (2002)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)
Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 87–92 (2007)
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013)
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–78 (2007)
Jalowski, M., Fritzsche, A., Möslein, K.M.: Facilitating collaborative design: a toolkit for integrating persuasive technologies in design activities. Procedia CIRP 84, 61–67 (2019)
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 485–500 (2009)
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 164–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_15
Fogg, B.: Creating persuasive technologies: an eight-step design process. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology - Persuasive 2009 (2009)
Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 77–89 (2016)
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)
Sonnenberg, C., vom Brocke, J.: Evaluations in the science of the artificial – reconsidering the build-evaluate pattern in design science research. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 381–397. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_28
Stibe, A., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Using social influence for motivating customers to generate and share feedback. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 224–235. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_19
Challco, G.C., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S.: An ontology framework to apply gamification in CSCL scenarios as persuasive technology. Rev. Bras. Informática na Educ. 24(2), 67–76 (2016)
Orji, R., Moffatt, K.: Persuasive technology for health and wellness: state-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health Inform. J. 24(1), 66–91 (2018)
Hagen, P., Robertson, T.: Dissolving boundaries: social technologies and participation in design. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group on Design: Open 24/7 - OZCHI 2009, pp. 129–136 (2009)
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Kathrin M. Möslein and Martin Schymanietz for their support and comments on this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jalowski, M. (2020). Integrating Persuasive Technology in Participatory Design Workshops: Prototypes for Participant Support. In: Gram-Hansen, S., Jonasen, T., Midden, C. (eds) Persuasive Technology. Designing for Future Change. PERSUASIVE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12064. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45712-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45712-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45711-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45712-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)