Skip to main content

Locating Influential Agents in Social Networks: Budget-Constrained Seed Set Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12109))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The study of information spread in social networks has applications in viral marketing, rumour modelling, and opinion dynamics. Often, it is crucial to identify a small set of influential agents that maximize the spread of information (cases which we refer to as being budget-constrained). These nodes are believed to have special topological properties and reside in the core of a network. We introduce the concept of nucleus decomposition, a clique based extension of core decomposition of graphs, as a new method to locate influential nodes. Our analysis shows that influential nodes lie in the k-nucleus subgraphs and that these nodes outperform lower-order decomposition techniques such as truss and core, while simultaneously focusing on a smaller set of seed nodes. Examining different diffusion models on real-world networks, we provide insights as well into the value of the degree centrality heuristic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    [19] showed that (3, 4)-nucleus provides high-quality outputs in terms of density and network hierarchy; e.g., it finds both small sets of high density and large sets of low density.

References

  1. Arora, A., Galhotra, S., Ranu, S.: Debunking the myths of influence maximization: an in-depth benchmarking study. In: ACM International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 651–666 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, P.E., Feng, J.: Measuring user influence on twitter using modified k-shell decomposition. In: Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chakrabarti, D., Wang, Y., Wang, C., Leskovec, J., Faloutsos, C.: Epidemic thresholds in real networks. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 10(4), 1 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, W., Wang, C., Wang, Y.: Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 1029–1038. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, J.: Trusses: Cohesive subgraphs for social network analysis. National Security Agency Technical Report 16 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giatsidis, C., Thilikos, D.M., Vazirgiannis, M.: D-cores: measuring collaboration of directed graphs based on degeneracy. In: 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 201–210. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Granovetter, M.: Threshold models of collective behavior. Am. J. Sociol. 83(6), 1420–1443 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 137–146. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kermack, W.O., McKendrick, A.G.: A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the royal society of london. Series A, Containing papers of a mathematical and physical character 115(772), 700–721 (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kitsak, M., et al.: Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nat. Phys. 6(11), 888 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leskovec, J., Krevl, A.: SNAP Datasets: stanford large network dataset collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data (2014)

  12. Li, Y., Fan, J., Wang, Y., Tan, K.L.: Influence maximization on social graphs: a survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 30(10), 1852–1872 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malliaros, F.D., Rossi, M.E.G., Vazirgiannis, M.: Locating influential nodes in complex networks. Sci. Rep. 6, 19307 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K.P., Druschel, P., Bhattacharjee, B.: Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 29–42. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pei, S., Muchnik, L., Andrade Jr., J.S., Zheng, Z., Makse, H.A.: Searching for superspreaders of information in real-world social media. Sci. Rep. 4, 5547 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, A., Spasojevic, N., Li, Z., Dsouza, T.: Klout score: measuring influence across multiple social networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Big Data, pp. 2282–2289 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sardana, N., Cohen, R., Zhang, J., Chen, S.: A bayesian multiagent trust model for social networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 5(4), 995–1008 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sariyüce, A.E., Seshadhri, C., Pinar, A.: Local algorithms for hierarchical dense subgraph discovery. Proc. VLDB Endow. 12(1), 43–56 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sariyüce, A.E., Seshadhri, C., Pinar, A., Çatalyürek, Ü.V.: Nucleus decompositions for identifying hierarchy of dense subgraphs. ACM Trans. Web 11(3), 16 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seidman, S.B.: Network structure and minimum degree. Soc. Netw. 5(3), 269–287 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, B., Ng, V.T.Y.: Identifying influential users by their postings in social networks. In: Atzmueller, M., Chin, A., Helic, D., Hotho, A. (eds.) MSM/MUSE -2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8329, pp. 128–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45392-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang, Y., Shi, Y., Xiao, X.: Influence maximization in near-linear time: a martingale approach. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 1539–1554. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilder, B., et al.: End-to-end influence maximization in the field. In: 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1414–1422 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yadav, A., et al.: Bridging the gap between theory and practice in influence maximization: raising awareness about HIV among homeless youth. In: IJCAI, pp. 5399–5403 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, X., Zhu, J., Wang, Q., Zhao, H.: Identifying influential nodes in complex networks with community structure. Knowl. Based Syst. 42, 74–84 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishav Raj Agarwal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Agarwal, R.R., Cohen, R., Golab, L., Tsang, A. (2020). Locating Influential Agents in Social Networks: Budget-Constrained Seed Set Selection. In: Goutte, C., Zhu, X. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12109. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47358-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47358-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47357-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47358-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics