Abstract
This paper is a literature review attempting to summarize the different theories and models that can deal with the phenomena of technostress and mental workload generated by the use of digital technologies in the work context. Theories including the task-technology fit model, the person-technology fit or the socio-technical perspectives such as the process of appropriation of technology, will foster a new point of view to understand the relationship between mental workload and technostress. A discussion will be proposed, comprehending a series of reflections on the above-mentioned theories, as well as an attempt to answer the question proposed in the title of this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aljukhadar, M., et al.: Is more always better? Investigating the task-technology fit theory in an online user context. Inf. Manag. 51(4), 391–397 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.10.003
Ayyagari, R., et al.: Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Q. 35(4), 831 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963
Ayyagari, R.: Impact of information overload and task-technology fit on technostress. In: Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 23–24 March (2012)
Carroll, J.: Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, New York, Boston (2001)
Brod, C.: Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Addison Wesley, London (1984)
Burns, C.M.: Understanding, supporting, and redesigning cognitive work. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2018. CCIS, vol. 1012, pp. 3–12. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14273-5_1
Cain, B.: A review of the mental workload literature. Defence Research and Development Toronto (Canada), Toronto, ON, Canada, pp. 1–35 (2007)
Carroll, J.: Completing design in use: closing the appropriation cycle. In: ECIS 2004 Proceedings (2004)
Carroll, J., et al.: Identity, power and fragmentation in cyberspace: technology appropriation by young people. In: ACIS 2001 Proceedings (2001)
Cascio, W.F.: Psychology of human resource management. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 348–352 Elsevier (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.73024-8
Cascio, W.F., Montealegre, R.: How technology is changing work and organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3(1), 349–375 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
D’Ambra, J., et al.: Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of e-books by academics. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64(1), 48–64 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22757
(Mandy) Dang, Y., et al.: Examining the impacts of mental workload and task-technology fit on user acceptance of the social media search system. Inf. Syst. Front. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9879-y
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dix, A.: Designing for appropriation. In: Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on HCI 2007: HCI…but not as we know it - Volume 2, BCS HCI 2007, University of Lancaster, United Kingdom, 3–7 September 2007 (2007)
Dix, A. (ed.): Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson/Prentice-Hall, Harlow, New York (2004)
Fischer, T., Riedl, R.: Technostress research: a nurturing ground for measurement pluralism? CAIS 40, 375–401 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04017
French Jr., J.R.P., Rodgers, W.L., Cobb, S.: Adjustment as person-environment fit. In: Coelho, G., Hamburg, D., Adams, J. (eds.) Coping and Adaptation, pp. 316–333. Basic Books, New York (1974)
Fuglseth, A.M., Sørebø, Ø.: The effects of technostress within the context of employee use of ICT. Comput. Hum. Behav. 40, 161–170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.040
Galy, E.: A multidimensional scale of mental workload evaluation based on Individual – Workload – Activity (IWA) model: validation and relationships with job satisfaction. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. (2019, in press)
Galy, E.: Consideration of several mental workload categories: perspectives for elaboration of new ergonomic recommendations concerning shiftwork. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 19(4), 483–497 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2017.1381777
Galy, E.: Temps de travail pour tant de travail: Vers un modèle intégrant l’individu, la charge mentale et l’activité (ICA). Presses Académiques Franco (2013)
Galy, E., et al.: What is the relationship between mental workload factors and cognitive load types? Int. J. Psychophysiol. 83(3), 269–275 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.023
Goodhue, D.L.: Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information system. Decis. Sci. 29(1), 105–138 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01346.x
Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19(2), 213 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
Hsiao, K.-L.: Compulsive mobile application usage and technostress: the role of personality traits. Online Inf. Rev. 41(2), 272–295 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2016-0091
Hollender, N., et al.: Integrating cognitive load theory and concepts of human–computer interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1278–1288 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.031
Isaac, H., et al.: Surcharge informationnelle, urgence et TIC. L’effet temporel des technologies de l’information. Manag. Avenir 13(3), 149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.013.0149
Ivory, M., Hearst, M.: The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 33(4), 470–516 (2001)
Karray, F., et al.: Human-computer interaction: overview on state of the art. Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst. 1(1), 137–159 (2008). https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2017-283
Kim, J., Gatling, A.: Impact of employees’ job, organizational and technology fit on engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. JHTT, JHTT-04-2018-0029 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-04-2018-0029
Kupersmith, J.: Technostress and the reference librarian. Ref. Serv. Rev. 20(2), 7–50 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb049150
Longo, L.: Experienced mental workload, perception of usability, their interaction and impact on task performance. PLoS ONE 13(8), e0199661 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199661
Longo, L., et al.: The importance of human mental workload in web design. In: WEBIST 2012: 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, Porto, Portugal, 18–21 April (2012)
Mahapatra, M., Pillai, R.: Technostress in organizations. A review of literature. In: 26th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2018), Portsmouth, UK (2018)
Marchiori, D.M., et al.: Do individual characteristics influence the types of technostress reported by workers? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 35(3), 218–230 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1449713
McCarthy, R., Aronson, J., Mazouz, K.: Measuring the validity of task technology fit for knowledge management systems. In: AMCIS 2001 Proceedings, p. 337 (2001)
Mitchell, D.K.: Mental Workload and ARL Workload Modeling Tools (Technical Note ARL-TN-161). U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (2000)
Nimrod, G.: Technostress: measuring a new threat to well-being in later life. Aging Mental Health 22(8), 1086–1093 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1334037
O’Donnell, R., Eggemeier, F.: Workload assessment methodology. In: Boff, K.R., Kaufman, L., Thomas, J.P. (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Cognitive Processes and Performance, vol. 2. Wiley, Hoboken (1986)
Orlikowski, W.J.: Using technology and constituting structures; a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4) (2000). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
Orlikowski, W.J.: The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3), 398–427 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
Orru, G., Longo, L.: The evolution of cognitive load theory and the measurement of its intrinsic, extraneous and germane loads: a review. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2018. CCIS, vol. 1012, pp. 23–48. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14273-5_3
Ragu-Nathan, T.S., et al.: The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Inf. Syst. Res. 19(4), 417–433 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
Riedl, R.: On the biology of technostress: literature review and research agenda. SIGMIS Database 44(1), 18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2436239.2436242
Rosen, L., Weil, M.: Technostress: Coping with Technology@ Work@ Home@ Play. Wiley, Etobicoke (1997)
Salanova, M., et al.: El Tecnoestrés: Concepto, Medida e Intervención Psicosocial [Technostress: Concept, Measurement and Prevention]. Nota Técnica de Prevención. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo, Madrid (2007)
Salanova, M., et al.: The dark side of technologies: technostress among users of information and communication technologies. Int. J. Psychol. 48(3), 422–436 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460
Sellberg, C., Susi, T.: Technostress in the office: a distributed cognition perspective on human–technology interaction. Cogn. Technol. Work 16(2), 187–201 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-013-0256-9
Sperandio, J.: La charge mentale… au travers de quelques recherches anciennes d’ergonomie. In: 10th Conference on Psychology and Ergonomics EPIQUE Arpege Science Publishing, pp. 57–62 (2019)
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn. Sci. 12, 257–285 (1988)
Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learn. Instr. 4, 295–312 (1994)
Tarafdar, M., et al.: Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. J. Manag. Inf. Sys. 27(3), 303–334 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270311
Tarafdar, M., et al.: The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. J. Manag. Inf. Sys. 24(1), 301–328 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
Tarafdar, M., Wenninger, H.: Effects of ‘fit’ on email overload. In: Twenty-Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New Orleans (2018)
Tracy, J.P., Albers, M.J.: Measuring cognitive load to test the usability of web sites. In: Annual Conference-Society for Technical Communication, vol. 53, pp. 256–260 (2006)
Tomer, G.: Person-technology fit and work outcomes: a study among IT professionals in India. ECIS 2015 Completed Research Papers, Paper 181 (2015)
Tomer, G.: Towards developing career technology fit framework and analyzing its influence on work related outcomes among IT professionals (2013)
Tu, Q., Wang, K., Shu, Q., Computer stress – related in china. Commun. ACM 48(4), 77–81 (2008)
Vold, M.A.: New technology in the office: attitudes and consequences. Work Stress: Int. J. Work Health Organ. 1, 143–153 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1080/02678378708258496
Wickens, C.D.: Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum. Factors 50(3), 449–455 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394
Yan, Z., et al.: Understanding the linkage between technology features and technostress. In: Telemedicine Communication, ECIS 2013 Research in Progress (2013)
Yong, J.-H., et al.: A study of person-technology fit in the cloud computing classroom. Int. J. Online Pedagogy Course Des. 7(3), 1–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2017070101
Young, M.S., et al.: State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58(1), 1–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.956151
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Castillo, J.M., Galy, E., Thérouanne, P. (2020). Mental Workload and Technostress at Work. Which Perspectives and Theoretical Frameworks Can Help Us Understand Both Phenomena Together?. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Mental Workload, Human Physiology, and Human Energy. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12186. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49044-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49044-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49043-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49044-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)