Skip to main content

The Effects of Face Inversion and the Number of Feature Differences on Eye-Movement Patterns

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Mental Workload, Human Physiology, and Human Energy (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12186))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recognition of the inverted faces (compared to upright faces) becomes much more difficult, this phenomenon is known as “facial inversion effect”. The role of face inversion on the eye-movement patterns is still under debate. In the current research, we aimed to investigate the effects of face inversion and the number of feature differences on eye-movement patterns during judgement of similarity between two faces. The participants were asked to judge the pairs of faces similarity by a 4-point Likert scale. Eye-movements were recorded during similarity ratings. The faces were presented either upright or inverted. The pairs of the faces were either the same or different. The different pairs of faces were manipulated via the number of feature differences (i.e., one feature or two features). As expected, we found that the inversion of the faces resulted in a higher level of estimated similarity in overall. However, when only the hairs were different between two faces, the inversion of the faces resulted in a lower level of estimated similarity. Surprisingly, the inversion of the faces resulted in a significant decrease of transitions between the pairs of inverted faces. The less eye gaze transitions during similarity rating of inverted pairs suggested that the feature-based processing strategy of inverted faces was less likely to be used in our rating task that presumably exerts no memory load. In conclusion, our findings suggested that both face inversion and the number of feature differences influence the eye-movement patterns during the similarity rating of two simultaneously presented faces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.E.A., Gobbini, M.I.: The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(6), 223–233 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanaka, J.W., Simonyi, D.: The “parts and wholes” of face recognition: a review of the literature. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 69(10), 1876–1889 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yin, R.K.: Looking at upide-down faces. J. Exp. Psychol. 81(1), 141–145 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rossion, B., Gauthier, I.: How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 1(1), 63–75 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Althoff, R.R., Cohen, N.J.: Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25(4), 997–1010 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henderson, J.M., Williams, C.C., Falk, R.J.: Eye movements are functional during face learning. Mem. Cogn. 33(1), 98–106 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stacey, P.C., Walker, S., Underwood, J.D.M.: Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data. Br. J. Psychol. 96(Pt 4), 407–422 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams, C.C., Henderson, J.M.: The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements. Mem. Cogn. 35, 1977–1985 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lê, S., Raufaste, E., Démonet, J.F.: Processing of normal, inverted, and scrambled faces in a patient with prosopagnosia: Behavioural and eye tracking data. Cogn. Brain. Res. 17(1), 26–35 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barton, J.J.S., et al.: Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception 35(8), 1089–1105 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallay, M., et al.: Qualitative differences in the exploration of upright and upside-down faces in four-month-old infants: an eye-movement study. Child Dev. 77(4), 984–996 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Der Geest, J.N.V., et al.: Gaze behavior of children with pervasive developmental disorder toward human faces: a fixation time study. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 43(5), 669–678 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruce, V.: Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 73(1), 105–116 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duchaine, B., Nakayama, K.: Developmental prosopagnosia and the Benton Facial Recognition Test. Neurology 62(7), 1219–1220 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Longmore, C.A., Liu, C.H., Young, A.W.: Learning faces from photographs. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34(1), 77–100 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Armann, R., Bülthoff, I.: Gaze behavior in face comparison: the roles of sex, task, and symmetry. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71(5), 1107–1126 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, M.-F., et al.: Exploring the cognitive processes causing the age-related categorization deficit in the recognition of facial expressions. Exp. Aging Res. 42(4), 348–364 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Özbek, M., Bindemann, M.: Exploring the time course of face matching: temporal constraints impair unfamiliar face identification under temporally unconstrained viewing. Vis. Res. 51(19), 2145–2155 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Popivanov, I.D., Mateeff, S.: Eye-movements during similarity judgement of upright and inverted faces. Comptes Rendus De L Acad. Bulgare Des Sci. 64(3), 425–430 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tanaka, J.W., Farah, M.J.: Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 46(2), 225–245 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nachson, I., Shechory, M.: Effect of inversion on the recognition of external and internal facial features. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 109(3), 227–238 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meinhardt-Injac, B., Meinhardt, G., Schwaninger, A.: Does matching of internal and external facial features depend on orientation and viewpoint? Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 132(3), 267–278 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rakover, S.S., Teucher, B.: Facial inversion effects: parts and whole relationship. Percept. Psychophys. 59(5), 752–761 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bindemann, M., Sandford, A.: Me, myself, and I: different recognition rates for three photo-IDs of the same person. Perception 40(5), 625–627 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kemp, R.I., Towell, N., Pike, G.: When seeing should not be believing: photographs, credit cards and fraud. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 11(3), 211–222 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700955), Guangdong Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science Project (GD17CXL03) and Guangdong Innovative Young Talents in Universities and Colleges Project (2018WQNCX175).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Fang Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, MF., Zimmer, H.D. (2020). The Effects of Face Inversion and the Number of Feature Differences on Eye-Movement Patterns. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Mental Workload, Human Physiology, and Human Energy. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12186. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49044-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49044-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49043-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49044-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics