Skip to main content

Ideal Election Method by Adopting the Interval Scale Instead of the Ordinal Scale

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction. Human Values and Quality of Life (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12183))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1972 Accesses

Abstract

Today, most democratic countries adopt the election system based on the notion of “one vote for one voter”. The winner will be determined by the total number of votes that s/he obtained. But will it be the optimal voting method considering the occurrence of the cracked vote? If there are two opposite sides and there are only two candidates one for each side, it would be adequate. But if there is only one candidate on one side and more than one candidate on other side, the latter votes will be cracked, thus the former side may win. Because of this phenomenon, each side strives to coordinate the candidate just to one.

This paper proposes another way of voting method based on the rating method where the basic notion is “onetime ratings for one voter”. In this method, each voter gives ratings to all candidates, for example, from 1 to 5 where 1 is negligible and 5 is the most preferable. The default rating value for each candidate is 1 and voters can change the point for the preferable candidate to 5 or 4. After the vote, all the rating points will be summed up and the candidate who won the maximum summative rating point will win.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stevens, S.S.: Problems and methods of psychophysics. Psychol. Bull. 55(4), 177–196 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Borda, J.-C.: Memoire sur les elections au scrutiny. Histoire de l’Academie Royale des Sciences (1781)

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Condorcet, M., de Caritat, N.: Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix (1785)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Young, H.P., Levenglick, A.: A sosistent extension of condorcet’s election principle. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 35(2), 285–300 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Young, H.P.: Condorcet’s theory of voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 82 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Likert, R.: A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 140(55) (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sakai, T.: Questioning the Majority Decision, (in Japanese). Iwanami Books (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaaki Kurosu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kurosu, M., Hashizume, A. (2020). Ideal Election Method by Adopting the Interval Scale Instead of the Ordinal Scale. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Human Values and Quality of Life. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12183. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49065-2_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49065-2_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49064-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49065-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics